Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Pfister

dblp:183/1763 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 5Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Datacenter networks · 36% Internet architecture and protocols · 23% Routing and switching · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › overlay networks
application-aware routing
0.312018
6LB: Scalable and Application-Aware Load Balancing with Segment Routing · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018
Datacenter networks
load balancing
0.312018
6LB: Scalable and Application-Aware Load Balancing with Segment Routing · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018
Software-defined and programmable networks
programmable data plane
0.312018
Stateless Load-Aware Load Balancing in P4 · ICNP 2018
Routing and switching › source routing
segment routing
0.312018
6LB: Scalable and Application-Aware Load Balancing with Segment Routing · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018
Datacenter networks › load balancing
stateless load balancing
0.312018
Stateless Load-Aware Load Balancing in P4 · ICNP 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling
0.312018
Stateless Load-Aware Load Balancing in P4 · ICNP 2018
Internet architecture and protocols › IPv6
IPv6 segment routing
0.112018
Stateless Load-Aware Load Balancing in P4 · ICNP 2018
Routing and switching
traffic engineering
0.112018
6LB: Scalable and Application-Aware Load Balancing with Segment Routing · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

power-of-choices · 0.7covert channel · 0.7consistent hashing · 0.7segment routing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 A Content-aware Data-plane for Efficient And Scalable Video Delivery
Yoann Desmouceaux, Marcel Enguehard, Victor Nguyen, Pierre Pfister, Wenqin Shao, Eric Vyncke
IM4
2019 High-speed data plane and network functions virtualization by vectorizing packet processing
Leonardo Linguaglossa, Dario Rossi 0001, Salvatore Pontarelli, David Barach, Damjan Marjon, Pierre Pfister
Comput. Networks6
2018 Stateless Load-Aware Load Balancing in P4
abstract
Leveraging the performance opportunities offered by programmable hardware, stateless load-balancing architectures allowing line-rate processing are appealing. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that significantly fairer load-balancing can be achieved by an architecture that considers the actual load of application instances when dispatching connection requests. Architectures which maintain per-connection state for resiliency and/or track application load state for fairness are, however, at odds with hardware-imposed memory constraints. Thus, a desirable load-balancer for programmable hardware would be both stateless and able to dispatch queries to application instances according to their current load. This paper presents SHELL, a stateless application-aware load-balancer combining (i) a power-of-choices scheme using IPv6 Segment Routing to dispatch new flows to a suitable application instance from among multiple candidates, and (ii) the use of a covert channel to record/report which flow was assigned to which candidate in a stateless fashion. In addition, consistent hashing versioning is used to ensure that connections are maintained to the correct application instance, using Segment Routing to "browse" through the history when needed. The stateless design of SHELL makes it suitable for hardware implementation, and this paper describes the implementation of a P4-NetFPGA prototype. A performance evaluation of this SHELL implementation demonstrates throughput and latency characteristics comparable to other stateless load-balancing implementations, while enabling application instance-load-aware dispatching and significantly increasing per-connection consistency resiliency.
Benoit Pit-Claudel, Yoann Desmouceaux, Pierre Pfister, W. Mark Townsley, Thomas H. Clausen
ICNP3
2018 6LB: Scalable and Application-Aware Load Balancing with Segment Routing
Yoann Desmouceaux, Pierre Pfister, Jerome Tollet, W. Mark Townsley, Thomas H. Clausen
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.2
2017 SRLB: The Power of Choices in Load Balancing with Segment Routing
abstract
Network load-balancers generally either do not take application state into account, or do so at the cost of a centralized monitoring system. This paper introduces a load-balancer running exclusively within the IP forwarding plane, i.e. in an application protocol agnostic fashion - yet which still provides application-awareness and makes real-time, decentralized decisions. To that end, IPv6 Segment Routing is used to direct data packets from a new flow through a chain of candidate servers, until one decides to accept the connection, based on its local state. This way, applications themselves naturally decide on how to share incoming connections, while incurring minimal network overhead, and no out-of-band signaling. Tests on different workloads - including realistic workloads such as replaying actual Wikipedia access traffic towards a set of replica Wikipedia instances - show significant performance benefits, in terms of shorter response times, when compared to a traditional random load-balancer.
Yoann Desmouceaux, Pierre Pfister, Jerome Tollet, W. Mark Townsley, Thomas H. Clausen
ICDCS2
2016 Distributed node consensus protocol: Analysis, evaluation and performance
abstract
This paper analyzes and evaluates the Distributed Node Consensus Protocol (DNCP), a state synchronization mechanism developed by the IETF Homenet working group. DNCP enables network function automation for home networks, which are growing in size and complexity. The basic mechanisms of DNCP are studied in this paper, including the state abstraction, synchronization process and keep-alive mechanism. The overhead is analyzed in single-link topology type. To evaluate the performance of DNCP in more complex scenarios, a reference implementation of DNCP is integrated into ns3 simulator. The convergence time and transmission overhead in various topology types are measured. Based on the obtained results, the correctness of DNCP is verified, and the behavior of DNCP can be concluded.
Kaiwen Jin, Pierre Pfister, Jiazi Yi
ICC2