Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Ament

dblp:183/6328 · also Sebastian E. Ament · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
6as first author
10since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6316-4633ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 42% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 6%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 57% Algorithms and data structures · 30% Information theory · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
1.622025
Scalable Gaussian Processes with Latent Kronecker Structure · ICML 2025
Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
1.532024
Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Scalable First-Order Bayesian Optimization via Structured Automatic Differentiation · ICML 2022
Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
scalable gaussian process
0.912025
Scalable Gaussian Processes with Latent Kronecker Structure · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › gaussian process regression
robust gaussian process regression
0.812024
Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function
0.712023
Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
high-dimensional bayesian optimization
0.612022
Scalable First-Order Bayesian Optimization via Structured Automatic Differentiation · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization
automatic differentiation
0.612022
Scalable First-Order Bayesian Optimization via Structured Automatic Differentiation · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.612022
Efficient projection algorithms onto the weighted ℓ1 ball · Artif. Intell. 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
gradient-based optimization
0.612022
Scalable First-Order Bayesian Optimization via Structured Automatic Differentiation · ICML 2022
Algorithms and data structures
numerical algorithms
0.612022
Efficient projection algorithms onto the weighted ℓ1 ball · Artif. Intell. 2022
Algorithms and data structures
numerical linear algebra
0.612022
Scalable First-Order Bayesian Optimization via Structured Automatic Differentiation · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
sparse bayesian learning
0.512021
Sparse Bayesian Learning via Stepwise Regression · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection
0.512021
Sparse Bayesian Learning via Stepwise Regression · ICML 2021
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.512021
Sparse Bayesian Learning via Stepwise Regression · ICML 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint satisfaction
constraint-based reasoning
0.412020
Deep Reasoning Networks for Unsupervised Pattern De-mixing with Constraint Reasoning · ICML 2020
Computational science and engineering
materials science
0.412020
Deep Reasoning Networks for Unsupervised Pattern De-mixing with Constraint Reasoning · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
unsupervised learning
0.112020
Deep Reasoning Networks for Unsupervised Pattern De-mixing with Constraint Reasoning · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structured automatic differentiation · 1.1kernel matrices · 1.1gaussian process · 1.1pathwise conditioning · 0.9iterative linear system solver · 0.9submodular optimization · 0.8relevance pursuit · 0.8log marginal likelihood · 0.8log-transformed acquisition functions · 0.7expected improvement · 0.7convex analysis · 0.6orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.5forward regression · 0.5coordinate ascent · 0.5backward regression · 0.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.4constraint reasoning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Scalable Gaussian Processes with Latent Kronecker Structure
abstract
Applying Gaussian processes (GPs) to very large datasets remains a challenge due to limited computational scalability. Matrix structures, such as the Kronecker product, can accelerate operations significantly, but their application commonly entails approximations or unrealistic assumptions. In particular, the most common path to creating a Kronecker-structured kernel matrix is by evaluating a product kernel on gridded inputs that can be expressed as a Cartesian product. However, this structure is lost if any observation is missing, breaking the Cartesian product structure, which frequently occurs in real-world data such as time series. To address this limitation, we propose leveraging latent Kronecker structure, by expressing the kernel matrix of observed values as the projection of a latent Kronecker product. In combination with iterative linear system solvers and pathwise conditioning, our method facilitates inference of exact GPs while requiring substantially fewer computational resources than standard iterative methods. We demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art sparse and variational GPs on real-world datasets with up to five million examples, including robotics, automated machine learning, and climate applications.
Jihao Andreas Lin, Sebastian Ament, Maximilian Balandat, David Eriksson, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Eytan Bakshy
ICML2
2024 Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit
abstract
Gaussian processes (GPs) are non-parametric probabilistic regression models that are popular due to their flexibility, data efficiency, and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. However, standard GP models assume homoskedastic Gaussian noise, while many real-world applications are subject to non-Gaussian corruptions. Variants of GPs that are more robust to alternative noise models have been proposed, and entail significant trade-offs between accuracy and robustness, and between computational requirements and theoretical guarantees. In this work, we propose and study a GP model that achieves robustness against sparse outliers by inferring data-point-specific noise levels with a sequential selection procedure maximizing the log marginal likelihood that we refer to as relevance pursuit. We show, surprisingly, that the model can be parameterized such that the associated log marginal likelihood is strongly concave in the data-point-specific noise variances, a property rarely found in either robust regression objectives or GP marginal likelihoods. This in turn implies the weak submodularity of the corresponding subset selection problem, and thereby proves approximation guarantees for the proposed algorithm. We compare the model’s performance relative to other approaches on diverse regression and Bayesian optimization tasks, including the challenging but common setting of sparse corruptions of the labels within or close to the function range.
Sebastian Ament, Elizabeth Santorella, David Eriksson, Benjamin Letham, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy
NeurIPS1
2023 Bayesian Optimization over High-Dimensional Combinatorial Spaces via Dictionary-based Embeddings
abstract
We consider the problem of optimizing expensive black-box functions over high-dimensional combinatorial spaces which arises in many science, engineering, and ML applications. We use Bayesian Optimization (BO) and propose a novel surrogate modeling approach for efficiently handling a large number of binary and categorical parameters. The key idea is to select a number of discrete structures from the input space (the dictionary) and use them to define an ordinal embedding for high-dimensional combinatorial structures. This allows us to use existing Gaussian process models for continuous spaces. We develop a principled approach based on binary wavelets to construct dictionaries for binary spaces, and propose a randomized construction method that generalizes to categorical spaces. We provide theoretical justification to support the effectiveness of the dictionary-based embeddings. Our experiments on diverse real-world benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed surrogate modeling approach over state-of-the-art BO methods.
Aryan Deshwal, Sebastian Ament, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy, Janardhan Rao Doppa, David Eriksson
AISTATS2
2023 Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimization
abstract
Expected Improvement (EI) is arguably the most popular acquisition function in Bayesian optimization and has found countless successful applications, but its performance is often exceeded by that of more recent methods. Notably, EI and its variants, including for the parallel and multi-objective settings, are challenging to optimize because their acquisition values vanish numerically in many regions. This difficulty generally increases as the number of observations, dimensionality of the search space, or the number of constraints grow, resulting in performance that is inconsistent across the literature and most often sub-optimal. Herein, we propose LogEI, a new family of acquisition functions whose members either have identical or approximately equal optima as their canonical counterparts, but are substantially easier to optimize numerically. We demonstrate that numerical pathologies manifest themselves in “classic” analytic EI, Expected Hypervolume Improvement (EHVI), as well as their constrained, noisy, and parallel variants, and propose corresponding reformulations that remedy these pathologies. Our empirical results show that members of the LogEI family of acquisition functions substantially improve on the optimization performance of their canonical counterparts and surprisingly, are on par with or exceed the performance of recent state-of-the-art acquisition functions, highlighting the understated role of numerical optimization in the literature.
Sebastian Ament, Samuel Daulton, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy
NeurIPS1
2022 The Fast Kernel Transform
abstract
Kernel methods are a highly effective and widely used collection of modern machine learning algorithms. A fundamental limitation of virtually all such methods are computations involving the kernel matrix that naively scale quadratically (e.g., matrix-vector multiplication) or cubically (solving linear systems) with the size of the dataset N. We propose the Fast Kernel Transform (FKT), a general algorithm to compute matrix-vector multiplications (MVMs) for datasets in moderate dimensions with quasilinear complexity. Typically, analytically grounded fast multiplication methods require specialized development for specific kernels. In contrast, our scheme is based on auto-differentiation and automated symbolic computations that leverage the analytical structure of the underlying kernel. This allows the FKT to be easily applied to a broad class of kernels, including Gaussian, Matern, and Rational Quadratic covariance functions and Green’s functions, including those of the Laplace and Helmholtz equations. Furthermore, the FKT maintains a high, quantifiable, and controllable level of accuracy—properties that many acceleration methods lack. We illustrate the efficacy and versatility of the FKT by providing timing and accuracy benchmarks with comparisons to adjacent methods, and by applying it to scale the stochastic neighborhood embedding (t-SNE) and Gaussian processes to large real-world datasets.
John Paul Ryan, Sebastian Ament, Carla P. Gomes, Anil Damle
AISTATS2
2022 Generalized Matching Pursuits for the Sparse Optimization of Separable Objectives
abstract
Matching pursuit algorithms are a popular family of algorithms for compressed sensing and feature selection. Originally, Matching Pursuit (MP) was proposed as an algorithm for the least-squares objective, but has recently been generalized to arbitrary convex objectives. Here, we are concerned with the case of a general objective that is separable over observed data points, which encompasses most problems of practical interest: least-squares, logistic, and robust regression problems, and the class of generalized linear models. We propose efficient generalizations of Forward and Backward Stepwise Regression for this case, which take advantage of special structure in the Hessian matrix and are based on a locally quadratic approximation of the objective. Notably, the acquisition criterion of the generalized stepwise algorithms can be computed with the same complexity as the ones for the least-squares objective. We further propose a modification to the Newton step to avoid saddle points of non-convex objectives. Lastly, we demonstrate the generality and performance of the forward algorithm on least-squares, logistic, and robust regression problems, for which it compares favorably to generalized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) on problems with moderate to large condition numbers.
Sebastian Ament, Carla P. Gomes
ICASSP1
2022 Scalable First-Order Bayesian Optimization via Structured Automatic Differentiation
abstract
Bayesian Optimization (BO) has shown great promise for the global optimization of functions that are expensive to evaluate, but despite many successes, standard approaches can struggle in high dimensions. To improve the performance of BO, prior work suggested incorporating gradient information into a Gaussian process surrogate of the objective, giving rise to kernel matrices of size $nd$ {\texttimes} $nd$ for $n$ observations in $d$ dimensions. Naı̈vely multiplying with (resp. inverting) these matrices requires $O(n^2d^2)$ (resp. $O(n^3d^3)$) operations, which becomes infeasible for moderate dimensions and sample sizes. Here, we observe that a wide range of kernels gives rise to structured matrices, enabling an exact $O(n^2d)$ matrix-vector multiply for gradient observations and $O(n^2d^2)$ for Hessian observations. Beyond canonical kernel classes, we derive a programmatic approach to leveraging this type of structure for transformations and combinations of the discussed kernel classes, which constitutes a structure-aware automatic differentiation algorithm. Our methods apply to virtually all canonical kernels and automatically extend to complex kernels, like the neural network, radial basis function network, and spectral mixture kernels without any additional derivations, enabling flexible, problem-dependent modeling while scaling first-order BO to high $d$.
Sebastian Ament, Carla P. Gomes
ICML1
2022 Efficient projection algorithms onto the weighted ℓ1 ball
Guillaume Perez, Sebastian Ament, Carla P. Gomes, Michel Barlaud
Artif. Intell.2
2021 On the Optimality of Backward Regression: Sparse Recovery and Subset Selection
abstract
Sparse recovery and subset selection are fundamental problems in varied communities, including signal processing, statistics and machine learning. Herein, we focus on an important greedy algorithm for these problems: Backward Stepwise Regression. We present novel guarantees for the algorithm, propose an efficient, numerically stable implementation, and put forth Stepwise Regression with Replacement (SRR), a new family of two-stage algorithms that employs both forward and backward steps for compressed sensing problems. Prior work on the backward algorithm has proven its optimality for the subset selection problem, provided the residual associated with the optimal solution is small enough. However, the existing bounds on the residual magnitude are NP-hard to compute. In contrast, our main theoretical result includes a bound that can be computed in polynomial time, depends chiefly on the smallest singular value of the matrix, and also extends to the method of magnitude pruning. In addition, we report numerical experiments highlighting crucial differences between forward and backward greedy algorithms and compare SRR against popular two-stage algorithms for compressed sensing. Remarkably, SRR algorithms generally maintain good sparse recovery performance on coherent dictionaries. Further, a particular SRR algorithm has an edge over Subspace Pursuit.
Sebastian Ament, Carla P. Gomes
ICASSP1
2021 Sparse Bayesian Learning via Stepwise Regression
abstract
Sparse Bayesian Learning (SBL) is a powerful framework for attaining sparsity in probabilistic models. Herein, we propose a coordinate ascent algorithm for SBL termed Relevance Matching Pursuit (RMP) and show that, as its noise variance parameter goes to zero, RMP exhibits a surprising connection to Stepwise Regression. Further, we derive novel guarantees for Stepwise Regression algorithms, which also shed light on RMP. Our guarantees for Forward Regression improve on deterministic and probabilistic results for Orthogonal Matching Pursuit with noise. Our analysis of Backward Regression culminates in a bound on the residual of the optimal solution to the subset selection problem that, if satisfied, guarantees the optimality of the result. To our knowledge, this bound is the first that can be computed in polynomial time and depends chiefly on the smallest singular value of the matrix. We report numerical experiments using a variety of feature selection algorithms. Notably, RMP and its limiting variant are both efficient and maintain strong performance with correlated features.
Sebastian Ament, Carla P. Gomes
ICML1
2020 Deep Reasoning Networks for Unsupervised Pattern De-mixing with Constraint Reasoning
abstract
We introduce Deep Reasoning Networks (DRNets), an end-to-end framework that combines deep learning with constraint reasoning for solving pattern de-mixing problems, typically in an unsupervised or very-weakly-supervised setting. DRNets exploit problem structure and prior knowledge by tightly combining constraint reasoning with stochastic-gradient-based neural network optimization. Our motivating task is from materials discovery and concerns inferring crystal structures of materials from X-ray diffraction data (Crystal-Structure-Phase-Mapping). Given the complexity of its underlying scientific domain, we start by introducing DRNets on an analogous but much simpler task: de-mixing overlapping hand-written Sudokus (Multi-MNIST-Sudoku). On Multi-MNIST-Sudoku, DRNets almost perfectly recovered the mixed Sudokus’ digits, with 100% digit accuracy, outperforming the supervised state-of-the-art MNIST de-mixing models. On Crystal-Structure-Phase-Mapping, DRNets significantly outperform the state of the art and experts’ capabilities, recovering more precise and physically meaningful crystal structures.
Di Chen 0001, Yiwei Bai, Wenting Zhao 0002, Sebastian Ament, John M. Gregoire, Carla P. Gomes
ICML4
2018 An Efficient Relaxed Projection Method for Constrained Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Application to the Phase-Mapping Problem in Materials Science
Junwen Bai, Sebastian Ament, Guillaume Perez, John M. Gregoire, Carla P. Gomes
CPAIOR2