Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian Dielitz

dblp:183/8084 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 46% Automata and formal languages · 30% Logic in computer science · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.712023
Temporal logics with language parameters · Inf. Comput. 2023
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.712023
Temporal logics with language parameters · Inf. Comput. 2023
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.712023
Temporal logics with language parameters · Inf. Comput. 2023
Automata and formal languages › pushdown automata
pushdown systems
0.212023
Temporal logics with language parameters · Inf. Comput. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal language theory · 0.7automata theory · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Temporal logics with language parameters
abstract
We develop a generic framework to extend the logics LTL, CTL + and CTL ⁎ by automata-based connectives from formal language classes and analyse this framework with regard to regular languages, visibly pushdown languages, deterministic and non-deterministic context-free languages. More precisely, we consider how the use of different automata classes changes the expressive power of the logics and provide algorithms for the satisfiability and model checking problems induced by the use of different classes of automata. For the model checking problem, we treat not only finite Kripke transition systems, but also visibly pushdown systems and pushdown systems. We provide completeness or undecidability results in all cases and show that the extensions we consider can formulate properties not expressible in classical temporal logics or regular extensions thereof.
Jens Oliver Gutsfeld, Markus Müller-Olm, Christian Dielitz
Inf. Comput.3
2021 Temporal Logics with Language Parameters
Jens Oliver Gutsfeld, Markus Müller-Olm, Christian Dielitz
LATA3