Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Dielitz
dblp:183/8084
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 46% Automata and formal languages · 30% Logic in computer science · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Temporal logics with language parameters · Inf. Comput. 2023 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Temporal logics with language parameters · Inf. Comput. 2023 |
Logic in computer science
temporal logic |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Temporal logics with language parameters · Inf. Comput. 2023 |
Automata and formal languages › pushdown automata
pushdown systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Temporal logics with language parameters · Inf. Comput. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal language theory · 0.7automata theory · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Temporal logics with language parametersabstractWe develop a generic framework to extend the logics LTL, CTL + and CTL ⁎ by automata-based connectives from formal language classes and analyse this framework with regard to regular languages, visibly pushdown languages, deterministic and non-deterministic context-free languages. More precisely, we consider how the use of different automata classes changes the expressive power of the logics and provide algorithms for the satisfiability and model checking problems induced by the use of different classes of automata. For the model checking problem, we treat not only finite Kripke transition systems, but also visibly pushdown systems and pushdown systems. We provide completeness or undecidability results in all cases and show that the extensions we consider can formulate properties not expressible in classical temporal logics or regular extensions thereof. Jens Oliver Gutsfeld, Markus Müller-Olm, Christian Dielitz |
Inf. Comput. | 3 |
| 2021 | Temporal Logics with Language Parameters
Jens Oliver Gutsfeld, Markus Müller-Olm, Christian Dielitz |
LATA | 3 |