Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roksana Baleshzar

dblp:185/0561 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 75% Mathematical optimization · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic combinatorial optimization
adaptivity gap
0.312017
Optimal Unateness Testers for Real-Valued Functions: Adaptivity Helps · ICALP 2017
Computational complexity
property testing
0.312017
Optimal Unateness Testers for Real-Valued Functions: Adaptivity Helps · ICALP 2017
Computational complexity
query complexity
0.312017
Optimal Unateness Testers for Real-Valued Functions: Adaptivity Helps · ICALP 2017
Computational complexity › property testing › boolean function testing
unateness testing
0.312017
Optimal Unateness Testers for Real-Valued Functions: Adaptivity Helps · ICALP 2017
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Optimal Unateness Testers for Real-Valued Functions: Adaptivity Helps
abstract
We study the problem of testing unateness of functions f:{0,1}^d -> R. We give an O(d/\epsilon . log(d/\epsilon))-query nonadaptive tester and an O(d/\epsilon)-query adaptive tester and show that both testers are optimal for a fixed distance parameter \epsilon. Previously known unateness testers worked only for Boolean functions, and their query complexity had worse dependence on the dimension both for the adaptive and the nonadaptive case. Moreover, no lower bounds for testing unateness were known. We generalize our results to obtain optimal unateness testers for functions f:[n]^d -> R. Our results establish that adaptivity helps with testing unateness of real-valued functions on domains of the form {0,1}^d and, more generally, [n]^d. This stands in contrast to the situation for monotonicity testing where there is no adaptivity gap for functions f:[n]^d -> R.
Roksana Baleshzar, Deeparnab Chakrabarty, Ramesh Krishnan S. Pallavoor, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Seshadhri Comandur
ICALP1