Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Felix Järemo Lawin

dblp:185/0985 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-4830-0443ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 42% 3D vision · 32% Efficient and distributed learning · 21%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video object segmentation
0.922020
Learning What to Learn for Video Object Segmentation · ECCV (2) 2020
Learning Fast and Robust Target Models for Video Object Segmentation · CVPR 2020
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud registration
0.312018
Density Adaptive Point Set Registration · CVPR 2018
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud registration › point set registration
probabilistic point set registration
0.312018
Density Adaptive Point Set Registration · CVPR 2018
Image and video processing › image restoration › inverse problem › signal reconstruction
phase unwrapping
0.212016
Efficient Multi-frequency Phase Unwrapping Using Kernel Density Estimation · ECCV (4) 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.112020
Learning What to Learn for Video Object Segmentation · ECCV (2) 2020
Image and video processing
kernel density estimation
0.112016
Efficient Multi-frequency Phase Unwrapping Using Kernel Density Estimation · ECCV (4) 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 0.4learning what to learn · 0.4generative target appearance model · 0.4fast optimization · 0.4kullback-leibler divergence · 0.3expectation-maximization · 0.3kernel density estimation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Registration Loss Learning for Deep Probabilistic Point Set Registration
abstract
Probabilistic methods for point set registration have interesting theoretical properties, such as linear complexity in the number of used points, and they easily generalize to joint registration of multiple point sets. In this work, we improve their recognition performance to match state of the art. This is done by incorporating learned features, by adding a von Mises-Fisher feature model in each mixture component, and by using learned attention weights. We learn these jointly using a registration loss learning strategy (RLL) that directly uses the registration error as a loss, by back-propagating through the registration iterations. This is possible as the probabilistic registration is fully differentiable, and the result is a learning framework that is truly end-to-end. We perform extensive experiments on the 3DMatch and Kitti datasets. The experiments demonstrate that our approach benefits significantly from the integration of the learned features and our learning strategy, outperforming the state-of-the-art on Kitti. Code is available at https://github.com/felja633/RLLReg.
Felix Järemo Lawin, Per-Erik Forssén
3DV1
2020 Learning Fast and Robust Target Models for Video Object Segmentation
abstract
Video object segmentation (VOS) is a highly challenging problem since the initial mask, defining the target object, is only given at test-time. The main difficulty is to effectively handle appearance changes and similar background objects, while maintaining accurate segmentation. Most previous approaches fine-tune segmentation networks on the first frame, resulting in impractical frame-rates and risk of overfitting. More recent methods integrate generative target appearance models, but either achieve limited robustness or require large amounts of training data. We propose a novel VOS architecture consisting of two network components. The target appearance model consists of a light-weight module, which is learned during the inference stage using fast optimization techniques to predict a coarse but robust target segmentation. The segmentation model is exclusively trained offline, designed to process the coarse scores into high quality segmentation masks. Our method is fast, easily trainable and remains highly effective in cases of limited training data. We perform extensive experiments on the challenging YouTube-VOS and DAVIS datasets. Our network achieves favorable performance, while operating at higher frame-rates compared to state-of-the-art. Code and trained models are available at https://github.com/andr345/frtm-vos.
Andreas Robinson, Felix Järemo Lawin, Martin Danelljan, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Michael Felsberg
CVPR2
2020 Learning What to Learn for Video Object Segmentation
Goutam Bhat, Felix Järemo Lawin, Martin Danelljan, Andreas Robinson, Michael Felsberg, Luc Van Gool, Radu Timofte
ECCV (2)2
2018 Density Adaptive Point Set Registration
abstract
Probabilistic methods for point set registration have demonstrated competitive results in recent years. These techniques estimate a probability distribution model of the point clouds. While such a representation has shown promise, it is highly sensitive to variations in the density of 3D points. This fundamental problem is primarily caused by changes in the sensor location across point sets. We revisit the foundations of the probabilistic registration paradigm. Contrary to previous works, we model the underlying structure of the scene as a latent probability distribution, and thereby induce invariance to point set density changes. Both the probabilistic model of the scene and the registration parameters are inferred by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence in an Expectation Maximization based framework. Our density-adaptive registration successfully handles severe density variations commonly encountered in terrestrial Lidar applications. We perform extensive experiments on several challenging real-world Lidar datasets. The results demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art probabilistic methods for multi-view registration, without the need of re-sampling.
Felix Järemo Lawin, Martin Danelljan, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Per-Erik Forssén, Michael Felsberg
CVPR1
2017 Deep Projective 3D Semantic Segmentation
Felix Järemo Lawin, Martin Danelljan, Patrik Tosteberg, Goutam Bhat, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Michael Felsberg
CAIP (1)1
2016 Efficient Multi-frequency Phase Unwrapping Using Kernel Density Estimation
Felix Järemo Lawin, Per-Erik Forssén, Hannes Ovren
ECCV (4)1