Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kevin Pederson
dblp:185/2141
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › manipulator kinematics
manipulability analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Locating assembly tasks in a manipulator's workspace · ICRA 1987 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › assembly planning
assembly task planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Locating assembly tasks in a manipulator's workspace · ICRA 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
workspace optimization · 0.0manipulability measure · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | Locating assembly tasks in a manipulator's workspaceabstractA system which automatically locates a part assembly task in a robot's workspace is described in this paper. The system determines the manipulability of a robot at points during the assembly operation. The assumption is made that the location of the assembly task within the workspace that results in the highest manipulability for the robot is a locally optimal position for performing the assembly. A path from assembly point to assembly point is also calculated to ensure that all motions necessary to perform the assembly operation are possible. In addition, a comparison of a manipulator's ability to perform a specific assembly operation in different workspace regions may be displayed graphically. Examples of various placements of an assembly task in a workspace and the placements' corresponding manipulability ratings are given, along with a graphical display of the comparison of manipulability in the different workspace regions. Brad Nelson, Kevin Pederson, Max Donath |
ICRA | 2 |