Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Pederson

dblp:185/2141 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › manipulator kinematics
manipulability analysis
0.011987
Locating assembly tasks in a manipulator's workspace · ICRA 1987
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › assembly planning
assembly task planning
0.011987
Locating assembly tasks in a manipulator's workspace · ICRA 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workspace optimization · 0.0manipulability measure · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 Locating assembly tasks in a manipulator's workspace
abstract
A system which automatically locates a part assembly task in a robot's workspace is described in this paper. The system determines the manipulability of a robot at points during the assembly operation. The assumption is made that the location of the assembly task within the workspace that results in the highest manipulability for the robot is a locally optimal position for performing the assembly. A path from assembly point to assembly point is also calculated to ensure that all motions necessary to perform the assembly operation are possible. In addition, a comparison of a manipulator's ability to perform a specific assembly operation in different workspace regions may be displayed graphically. Examples of various placements of an assembly task in a workspace and the placements' corresponding manipulability ratings are given, along with a graphical display of the comparison of manipulability in the different workspace regions.
Brad Nelson, Kevin Pederson, Max Donath
ICRA2