Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vinamra Benara
dblp:185/5780
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
interpretable embedding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Crafting Interpretable Embeddings for Language Neuroscience by Asking LLMs Questions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Crafting Interpretable Embeddings for Language Neuroscience by Asking LLMs Questions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompting · 1.5large language model · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Crafting Interpretable Embeddings for Language Neuroscience by Asking LLMs QuestionsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have rapidly improved text embeddings for a growing array of natural-language processing tasks. However, their opaqueness and proliferation into scientific domains such as neuroscience have created a growing need for interpretability. Here, we ask whether we can obtain interpretable embeddings through LLM prompting. We introduce question-answering embeddings (QA-Emb), embeddings where each feature represents an answer to a yes/no question asked to an LLM. Training QA-Emb reduces to selecting a set of underlying questions rather than learning model weights.
We use QA-Emb to flexibly generate interpretable models for predicting fMRI voxel responses to language stimuli. QA-Emb significantly outperforms an established interpretable baseline, and does so while requiring very few questions. This paves the way towards building flexible feature spaces that can concretize and evaluate our understanding of semantic brain representations. We additionally find that QA-Emb can be effectively approximated with an efficient model, and we explore broader applications in simple NLP tasks. Vinamra Benara, Chandan Singh, John X. Morris, Richard J. Antonello, Ion Stoica, Alexander G. Huth, Jianfeng Gao 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Bitwidth customization in image processing pipelines using interval analysis and SMT solversabstractUnlike CPUs and GPUs, it is possible to use custom fixed-point data types, specified as a tuple (α, β), on FPGAs. The parameters α and β denote the number of integral and fractional bitwidths respectively. The power and area savings while performing arithmetic operations on fixed-point data types are well known to be significant over using floating-point data types. Suresh Purini, Vinamra Benara, Ziaul Choudhury, Uday Bondhugula |
CC | 2 |