Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vinamra Benara

dblp:185/5780 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
interpretable embedding
0.812024
Crafting Interpretable Embeddings for Language Neuroscience by Asking LLMs Questions · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.212024
Crafting Interpretable Embeddings for Language Neuroscience by Asking LLMs Questions · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompting · 1.5large language model · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Crafting Interpretable Embeddings for Language Neuroscience by Asking LLMs Questions
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly improved text embeddings for a growing array of natural-language processing tasks. However, their opaqueness and proliferation into scientific domains such as neuroscience have created a growing need for interpretability. Here, we ask whether we can obtain interpretable embeddings through LLM prompting. We introduce question-answering embeddings (QA-Emb), embeddings where each feature represents an answer to a yes/no question asked to an LLM. Training QA-Emb reduces to selecting a set of underlying questions rather than learning model weights. We use QA-Emb to flexibly generate interpretable models for predicting fMRI voxel responses to language stimuli. QA-Emb significantly outperforms an established interpretable baseline, and does so while requiring very few questions. This paves the way towards building flexible feature spaces that can concretize and evaluate our understanding of semantic brain representations. We additionally find that QA-Emb can be effectively approximated with an efficient model, and we explore broader applications in simple NLP tasks.
Vinamra Benara, Chandan Singh, John X. Morris, Richard J. Antonello, Ion Stoica, Alexander G. Huth, Jianfeng Gao 0001
NeurIPS1
2020 Bitwidth customization in image processing pipelines using interval analysis and SMT solvers
abstract
Unlike CPUs and GPUs, it is possible to use custom fixed-point data types, specified as a tuple (α, β), on FPGAs. The parameters α and β denote the number of integral and fractional bitwidths respectively. The power and area savings while performing arithmetic operations on fixed-point data types are well known to be significant over using floating-point data types.
Suresh Purini, Vinamra Benara, Ziaul Choudhury, Uday Bondhugula
CC2