Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Charlotte Jewell

dblp:186/2742 · also Charlotte I. C. Jewell · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › social robot
robot personality		 0.412019
Why Children Prefer Extrovert or Introvert Robots: A Pilot Study Using Pairwise Robot Comparison · HRI 2019
Human-robot interaction
child-robot interaction		 0.112019
Why Children Prefer Extrovert or Introvert Robots: A Pilot Study Using Pairwise Robot Comparison · HRI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pilot study · 0.4pairwise robot comparison · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Why Children Prefer Extrovert or Introvert Robots: A Pilot Study Using Pairwise Robot Comparison
abstract
This work presents preliminary findings from a pilot study researching the complementary and similarity effect of personality of robots on children ( N=22). We aim to advance research on robot personality by using a pairwise robot comparison study, a novel method in HRI. Our findings show that the attributed gender and the voice of the robots were the main reasons given for a preference. Based on the preliminary data we hypothesize that boys have a preference for the robot with the same gender as themselves.
Charlotte Jewell, Shirley A. Elprama, An Jacobs, Pablo Gómez Esteban, Elahe Bagheri, Bram Vanderborght
 HRI1