Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

L. Stark

dblp:186/3246 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cooperative manipulation
cooperative robot control
0.011986
A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › compliant motion control
hybrid position/force control
0.011986
A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dual-arm manipulation
0.011986
A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
master-slave control
0.011986
A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system · ICRA 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

low-pass prefilter · 0.0band-pass cross filter · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system
abstract
A two armed master-slave robot was modeled; simulations were run with a variety of compensation schemes using a payload with a compressive spring of 10,000 N/m and a preload force of 25 N against the payload. The slave arm was at first controlled by a simple linear force controller; this was inadequate with position step commands in that the force response oscillated greatly and resulted in crushing or dropping the payload. A low pass prefilter in the position command path corrected this, but so slowed the position response that significant tasks could not be carried out. These results illustrate the two way physical linkage between position output and force regulation dynamics. A second order, band pass cross filter sending position command as input into the forward loop of the force controller, enabled adequate position control dynamics and kept the payload force excursions to a minimum.
C. J. Clark, L. Stark
ICRA2