Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karen Azari

dblp:187/5293 · also Karen Klein · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
3as first author
17since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-9303-750XORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 20 · 3 first-author · 17 since 2021Theory of computation · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
11 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 59% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 34% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 4%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › timed cryptography
verifiable delay functions
2.022026
Impossibility of VDFs in the ROM: The Complete Picture · EUROCRYPT (5) 2026
Separating Verifiable Delay Functions and Time-Lock Puzzles · EUROCRYPT (5) 2026
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
adaptive security
1.832025
On the Adaptive Security of Free-XOR-Based Garbling Schemes in the Plain Model · EUROCRYPT (6) 2025
The Power of Undirected Rewindings for Adaptive Security · CRYPTO (2) 2023
Be Adaptive, Avoid Overcommitting · CRYPTO (1) 2017
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
garbled circuits
1.422025
On the Adaptive Security of Free-XOR-Based Garbling Schemes in the Plain Model · EUROCRYPT (6) 2025
Limits on the Adaptive Security of Yao's Garbling · CRYPTO (2) 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange › group key agreement
continuous group key agreement
1.122022
CoCoA: Concurrent Continuous Group Key Agreement · EUROCRYPT (2) 2022
Keep the Dirt: Tainted TreeKEM, Adaptively and Actively Secure Continuous Group Key Agreement · SP 2021
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › timed cryptography
time-lock puzzles
1.012026
Separating Verifiable Delay Functions and Time-Lock Puzzles · EUROCRYPT (5) 2026
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
proofs of sequential work
1.022022
SNACKs: Leveraging Proofs of Sequential Work for Blockchain Light Clients · ASIACRYPT (1) 2022
Reversible Proofs of Sequential Work · EUROCRYPT (2) 2019
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
group key agreement
0.612022
CoCoA: Concurrent Continuous Group Key Agreement · EUROCRYPT (2) 2022
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › blockchain network
light client
0.612022
SNACKs: Leveraging Proofs of Sequential Work for Blockchain Light Clients · ASIACRYPT (1) 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
forward secrecy
0.512021
Keep the Dirt: Tainted TreeKEM, Adaptively and Actively Secure Continuous Group Key Agreement · SP 2021
Network security › secure communication
secure group communication
0.512021
Keep the Dirt: Tainted TreeKEM, Adaptively and Actively Secure Continuous Group Key Agreement · SP 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange › group key agreement › continuous group key agreement
TreeKEM
0.512021
Keep the Dirt: Tainted TreeKEM, Adaptively and Actively Secure Continuous Group Key Agreement · SP 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › composable security
concurrent security
0.212022
CoCoA: Concurrent Continuous Group Key Agreement · EUROCRYPT (2) 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random oracle model · 1.0impossibility proof · 1.0black-box separation · 1.0plain model · 0.9free-XOR · 0.9security reduction · 0.7protocol design · 0.6simulation · 0.5security proof · 0.5reversibility · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Separating Verifiable Delay Functions and Time-Lock Puzzles
Hamza Abusalah, Nivesh Aggarwal, Karen Azari, Chethan Kamath, Maximilian von Consbruch
EUROCRYPT (5)3
2026 Impossibility of VDFs in the ROM: The Complete Picture
Hamza Abusalah, Karen Azari, Chethan Kamath, Erkan Tairi, Maximilian von Consbruch
EUROCRYPT (5)2
2026 On Verifiable Delay Functions from Time-Lock Puzzles
Hamza Abusalah, Karen Azari, Dario Fiore 0001, Chethan Kamath, Erkan Tairi
PKC (4)2
2025 Tighter Provable Security for TreeKEM
Karen Azari, Andreas Ellison
ACNS (1)1
2025 On the Adaptive Security of Free-XOR-Based Garbling Schemes in the Plain Model
Anasuya Acharya, Karen Azari, Chethan Kamath
EUROCRYPT (6)2
2025 Securely Instantiating 'Half Gates' Garbling in the Standard Model
Anasuya Acharya, Karen Azari, Mirza Ahad Baig, Dennis Hofheinz, Chethan Kamath
PKC (4)2
2025 Security Amplification of Threshold Signatures in the Standard Model
Karen Azari, Cecilia Boschini, Kristina Hostáková, Michael Reichle
TCC (3)1
2023 The Power of Undirected Rewindings for Adaptive Security
Dennis Hofheinz, Julia Kastner 0001, Karen Azari
CRYPTO (2)3
2022 SNACKs: Leveraging Proofs of Sequential Work for Blockchain Light Clients
Hamza Abusalah, Georg Fuchsbauer, Peter Gazi, Karen Azari
ASIACRYPT (1)4
2022 Practical Statistically-Sound Proofs of Exponentiation in Any Group
Charlotte Hoffmann, Pavel Hubácek, Chethan Kamath, Karen Azari, Krzysztof Pietrzak
CRYPTO (2)4
2022 CoCoA: Concurrent Continuous Group Key Agreement
Joël Alwen, Benedikt Auerbach, Miguel Cueto Noval, Karen Azari, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Michael Walter 0001
EUROCRYPT (2)4
2021 Limits on the Adaptive Security of Yao's Garbling
Chethan Kamath, Karen Azari, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Daniel Wichs
CRYPTO (2)2
2021 Inverse-Sybil Attacks in Automated Contact Tracing
Benedikt Auerbach, Suvradip Chakraborty, Karen Azari, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Michael Walter 0001, Michelle Yeo
CT-RSA3
2021 Keep the Dirt: Tainted TreeKEM, Adaptively and Actively Secure Continuous Group Key Agreement
abstract
While messaging systems with strong security guarantees are widely used in practice, designing a protocol that scales efficiently to large groups and enjoys similar security guarantees remains largely open. The two existing proposals to date are ART (Cohn-Gordon et al., CCS18) and TreeKEM (IETF, The Messaging Layer Security Protocol, draft). TreeKEM is the currently considered candidate by the IETF MLS working group, but dynamic group operations (i.e. adding and removing users) can cause efficiency issues. In this paper we formalize and analyze a variant of TreeKEM which we term Tainted TreeKEM (TTKEM for short). The basic idea underlying TTKEM was suggested by Millican (MLS mailing list, February 2018). This version is more efficient than TreeKEM for some natural distributions of group operations, we quantify this through simulations.Our second contribution is two security proofs for TTKEM which establish post compromise and forward secrecy even against adaptive attackers. The security loss (to the underlying PKE) in the Random Oracle Model is a polynomial factor, and a quasipolynomial one in the Standard Model. Our proofs can be adapted to TreeKEM as well. Before our work no security proof for any TreeKEM-like protocol establishing tight security against an adversary who can adaptively choose the sequence of operations was known. We also are the first to prove (or even formalize) active security where the server can arbitrarily deviate from the protocol specification. Proving fully active security – where also the users can arbitrarily deviate – remains open.
Karen Azari, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Michael Walter 0001, Chethan Kamath, Margarita Capretto, Miguel Cueto Noval, Ilia Markov, Michelle Yeo, Joël Alwen, Krzysztof Pietrzak
SP1
2021 Grafting Key Trees: Efficient Key Management for Overlapping Groups
Joël Alwen, Benedikt Auerbach, Mirza Ahad Baig, Miguel Cueto Noval, Karen Azari, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Michael Walter 0001
TCC (3)5
2021 The Cost of Adaptivity in Security Games on Graphs
Chethan Kamath, Karen Azari, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Michael Walter 0001
TCC (2)2
2021 On Treewidth, Separators and Yao's Garbling
Chethan Kamath, Karen Azari, Krzysztof Pietrzak
TCC (2)2
2019 Reversible Proofs of Sequential Work
Hamza Abusalah, Chethan Kamath, Karen Azari, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Michael Walter 0001
EUROCRYPT (2)3
2018 On the Memory-Hardness of Data-Independent Password-Hashing Functions
abstract
We show attacks on five data-independent memory-hard functions (iMHF) that were submitted to the password hashing competition (PHC). Informally, an MHF is a function which cannot be evaluated on dedicated hardware, like ASICs, at significantly lower hardware and/or energy cost than evaluating a single instance on a standard single-core architecture. Data-independent means the memory access pattern of the function is independent of the input; this makes iMHFs harder to construct than data-dependent ones, but the latter can be attacked by various side-channel attacks.
Joël Alwen, Peter Gazi, Chethan Kamath, Karen Azari, Georg Osang, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Leonid Reyzin, Michal Rolínek, Michal Rybár
AsiaCCS4
2017 Be Adaptive, Avoid Overcommitting
Zahra Jafargholi, Chethan Kamath, Karen Azari, Ilan Komargodski, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Daniel Wichs
CRYPTO (1)3