Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon Tse

dblp:187/6835 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 61% Software-defined and programmable networks · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software-defined and programmable networks › SDN deployment
hybrid SDN
0.412019
Routing Stability in Hybrid Software-Defined Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019
Routing and switching › switching
path switching
0.412019
Routing Stability in Hybrid Software-Defined Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019
Routing and switching
routing stability
0.412019
Routing Stability in Hybrid Software-Defined Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019
Software-defined and programmable networks › control plane
centralized control
0.112019
Routing Stability in Hybrid Software-Defined Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

local search · 0.4greedy algorithm · 0.4global optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Routing Stability in Hybrid Software-Defined Networks
abstract
Software-defined networks (SDNs) facilitate more efficient routing of traffic flows using centralized network view. On the other hand, traditional distributed routing still enjoys the advantage of better scalability, robustness, and swift reaction to events such as failure. There are therefore significant potential benefits to adopt a hybrid operation where both distributed and centralized routing mechanisms co-exist. This hybrid operation however imposes a new challenge to network stability since a poor and inconsistent design can lead to repeated route switching when the two control mechanisms take turns to adjust the routes. In this paper, we discuss ways of solving the stability problem. We first define stability for hybrid SDNs and then establish a per-priority stabilizing framework to obtain stable routing patterns. For each priority class, we discuss three approaches to reach hybrid SDN stability: global optimization, greedy, and local search. It is argued that the proposed local search provides the best tradeoff among cost performance, computational complexity, and route disturbance. Furthermore, we design a system on a centralized controller, which utilizes those algorithms to stabilize the network. The design is implemented and extensively tested by simulations using realistic network information, including a trace of the Abilene network and data from a tier-1 Internet service providers backbone network.
Shih-Hao Tseng, Ao Tang, Gagan L. Choudhury, Simon Tse
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.4