Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Noémie Fong

dblp:187/8986 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.212016
Advanced Probabilistic Couplings for Differential Privacy · CCS 2016
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy auditing
verification of differential privacy
0.212016
Advanced Probabilistic Couplings for Differential Privacy · CCS 2016
Program verification
program logic
0.212016
Advanced Probabilistic Couplings for Differential Privacy · CCS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

type system · 0.5program logic · 0.5probabilistic coupling · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Advanced Probabilistic Couplings for Differential Privacy
abstract
Differential privacy is a promising formal approach to data privacy, which provides a quantitative bound on the privacy cost of an algorithm that operates on sensitive information. Several tools have been developed for the formal verification of differentially private algorithms, including program logics and type systems. However, these tools do not capture fundamental techniques that have emerged in recent years, and cannot be used for reasoning about cutting-edge differentially private algorithms. Existing techniques fail to handle three broad classes of algorithms: 1) algorithms where privacy depends on accuracy guarantees, 2) algorithms that are analyzed with the advanced composition theorem, which shows slower growth in the privacy cost, 3) algorithms that interactively accept adaptive inputs.
Gilles Barthe, Noémie Fong, Marco Gaboardi, Benjamin Grégoire, Justin Hsu, Pierre-Yves Strub
CCS2