Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anuradha Kar
dblp:189/2160
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2543-1697ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics › ligand binding site analysis
binding pocket prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Protein interaction explorer (PIE): a comprehensive platform for navigating protein-protein interactions and ligand binding pockets · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Protein interaction explorer (PIE): a comprehensive platform for navigating protein-protein interactions and ligand binding pockets · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction
protein-protein interaction analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Protein interaction explorer (PIE): a comprehensive platform for navigating protein-protein interactions and ligand binding pockets · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Protein interaction explorer (PIE): a comprehensive platform for navigating protein-protein interactions and ligand binding pockets · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Protein interaction explorer (PIE): a comprehensive platform for navigating protein-protein interactions and ligand binding pockets · Bioinform. 2024 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Protein interaction explorer (PIE): a comprehensive platform for navigating protein-protein interactions and ligand binding pocketsabstractSUMMARY: Protein Interaction Explorer (PIE) is a new web-based tool integrated to our database iPPI-DB, specifically crafted to support structure-based drug discovery initiatives focused on protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Drawing upon extensive structural data encompassing thousands of heterodimer complexes, including those with successful ligands, PIE provides a comprehensive suite of tools dedicated to aid decision-making in PPI drug discovery. PIE enables researchers/bioinformaticians to identify and characterize crucial factors such as the presence of binding pockets or functional binding sites at the interface, predicting hot spots, and foreseeing similar protein-embedded pockets for potential repurposing efforts. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PIE is user-friendly and readily accessible at https://ippidb.pasteur.fr/targetcentric/. It relies on the NGL visualizer. Fabien Mareuil, Alexandra Moine-Franel, Anuradha Kar, Michael Nilges, Constantin Bogdan Ciambur, Olivier Sperandio |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2022 | Visual Deep Learning-Based Explanation for Neuritic Plaques Segmentation in Alzheimer's Disease Using Weakly Annotated Whole Slide Histopathological Images
Gabriel Jimenez 0001, Anuradha Kar, Mehdi Ounissi, Léa Ingrassia, Susana Boluda, Benoît Delatour, Lev Stimmer, Daniel Racoceanu |
MICCAI (2) | 2 |
| 2022 | Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasetsabstractSegmenting three-dimensional (3D) microscopy images is essential for understanding phenomena like morphogenesis, cell division, cellular growth, and genetic expression patterns. Recently, deep learning (DL) pipelines have been developed, which claim to provide high accuracy segmentation of cellular images and are increasingly considered as the state of the art for image segmentation problems. However, it remains difficult to define their relative performances as the concurrent diversity and lack of uniform evaluation strategies makes it difficult to know how their results compare. In this paper, we first made an inventory of the available DL methods for 3D cell segmentation. We next implemented and quantitatively compared a number of representative DL pipelines, alongside a highly efficient non-DL method named MARS. The DL methods were trained on a common dataset of 3D cellular confocal microscopy images. Their segmentation accuracies were also tested in the presence of different image artifacts. A specific method for segmentation quality evaluation was adopted, which isolates segmentation errors due to under- or oversegmentation. This is complemented with a 3D visualization strategy for interactive exploration of segmentation quality. Our analysis shows that the DL pipelines have different levels of accuracy. Two of them, which are end-to-end 3D and were originally designed for cell boundary detection, show high performance and offer clear advantages in terms of adaptability to new data. Anuradha Kar, Manuel Petit, Yassin Refahi, Guillaume Cerutti, Christophe Godin, Jan Traas |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2016 | Towards the development of a standardized performance evaluation framework for eye gaze estimation systems in consumer platformsabstractThere is a need to standardize the performance of eye gaze estimation (EGE) methods in various platforms for human computer interaction (HCI). Because of lack of consistent schemes or protocols for summative evaluation of EGE systems, performance results in this field can neither be compared nor reproduced with any consistency. In contemporary literature, gaze tracking accuracy is measured under non-identical sets of conditions, with variable metrics and most results do not report the impact of system meta-parameters that significantly affect tracking performances. In this work, the diverse nature of these research outcomes and system parameters which affect gaze tracking in different platforms is investigated and their error contributions are estimated quantitatively. Then the concept and development of a performance evaluation framework is proposed- that can define design criteria and benchmark quality measures for the eye gaze research community. Anuradha Kar, Peter Corcoran 0001 |
SMC | 1 |