Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amit Pinchevski

dblp:189/6170 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian image modeling
bayesian segmentation
0.612022
Topical Segmentation of Spoken Narratives: A Test Case on Holocaust Survivor Testimonies · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 0.6mutual information · 0.6generative bayesian modeling · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Topical Segmentation of Spoken Narratives: A Test Case on Holocaust Survivor Testimonies
abstract
The task of topical segmentation is well studied, but previous work has mostly addressed it in the context of structured, well-defined segments, such as segmentation into paragraphs, chapters, or segmenting text that originated from multiple sources.We tackle the task of segmenting running (spoken) narratives, which poses hitherto unaddressed challenges.As a test case, we address Holocaust survivor testimonies, given in English.Other than the importance of studying these testimonies for Holocaust research, we argue that they provide an interesting test case for topical segmentation, due to their unstructured surface level, relative abundance (tens of thousands of such testimonies were collected), and the relatively confined domain that they cover.We hypothesize that boundary points between segments correspond to low mutual information between the sentences proceeding and following the boundary.Based on this hypothesis, we explore a range of algorithmic approaches to the task, building on previous work on segmentation that uses generative Bayesian modeling and state-of-the-art neural machinery.Compared to manually annotated references, we find that the developed approaches show considerable improvements over previous work.1
Eitan Wagner, Renana Keydar, Amit Pinchevski, Omri Abend
EMNLP3