Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Mathe

dblp:19/2961 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 28% Video understanding and tracking · 21% Image recognition and object detection · 18%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.432015
Actions in the Eye: Dynamic Gaze Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015
Dynamic Eye Movement Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Action Recognition · ECCV (2) 2012
Action from Still Image Dataset and Inverse Optimal Control to Learn Task Specific Visual Scanpaths · NIPS 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.212016
Reinforcement Learning for Visual Object Detection · CVPR 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.212016
Reinforcement Learning for Visual Object Detection · CVPR 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy learning
search policy learning
0.212016
Reinforcement Learning for Visual Object Detection · CVPR 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
sequential search
0.212016
Reinforcement Learning for Visual Object Detection · CVPR 2016
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
gaze estimation
0.212015
Actions in the Eye: Dynamic Gaze Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
saliency prediction
0.212015
Actions in the Eye: Dynamic Gaze Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
spatio-temporal interest points
0.212015
Actions in the Eye: Dynamic Gaze Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › inverse reinforcement learning
inverse optimal control
0.212013
Action from Still Image Dataset and Inverse Optimal Control to Learn Task Specific Visual Scanpaths · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward learning
0.212013
Action from Still Image Dataset and Inverse Optimal Control to Learn Task Specific Visual Scanpaths · NIPS 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › biological vision modeling
scanpath prediction
0.212013
Action from Still Image Dataset and Inverse Optimal Control to Learn Task Specific Visual Scanpaths · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
visual attention
0.212013
Action from Still Image Dataset and Inverse Optimal Control to Learn Task Specific Visual Scanpaths · NIPS 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
sliding window detection
0.112016
Reinforcement Learning for Visual Object Detection · CVPR 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

eye-tracking · 0.4sequential decision making · 0.2reinforcement learning · 0.2bag-of-words · 0.2inverse optimal control · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Reinforcement Learning for Visual Object Detection
abstract
One of the most widely used strategies for visual object detection is based on exhaustive spatial hypothesis search. While methods like sliding windows have been successful and effective for many years, they are still brute-force, independent of the image content and the visual category being searched. In this paper we present principled sequential models that accumulate evidence collected at a small set of image locations in order to detect visual objects effectively. By formulating sequential search as reinforcement learning of the search policy (including the stopping condition), our fully trainable model can explicitly balance for each class, specifically, the conflicting goals of exploration - sampling more image regions for better accuracy -, and exploitation - stopping the search efficiently when sufficiently confident about the target's location. The methodology is general and applicable to any detector response function. We report encouraging results in the PASCAL VOC 2012 object detection test set showing that the proposed methodology achieves almost two orders of magnitude speed-up over sliding window methods.
Stefan Mathe, Aleksis Pirinen, Cristian Sminchisescu
CVPR1
2015 Actions in the Eye: Dynamic Gaze Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Recognition
abstract
Systems based on bag-of-words models from image features collected at maxima of sparse interest point operators have been used successfully for both computer visual object and action recognition tasks. While the sparse, interest-point based approach to recognition is not inconsistent with visual processing in biological systems that operate in `saccade and fixate' regimes, the methodology and emphasis in the human and the computer vision communities remains sharply distinct. Here, we make three contributions aiming to bridge this gap. First, we complement existing state-of-the art large scale dynamic computer vision annotated datasets like Hollywood-2 [1] and UCF Sports [2] with human eye movements collected under the ecological constraints of visual action and scene context recognition tasks. To our knowledge these are the first large human eye tracking datasets to be collected and made publicly available for video, vision.imar.ro/eyetracking (497,107 frames, each viewed by 19 subjects), unique in terms of their (a) large scale and computer vision relevance, (b) dynamic, video stimuli, (c) task control, as well as free-viewing. Second, we introduce novel dynamic consistency and alignment measures, which underline the remarkable stability of patterns of visual search among subjects. Third, we leverage the significant amount of collected data in order to pursue studies and build automatic, end-to-end trainable computer vision systems based on human eye movements. Our studies not only shed light on the differences between computer vision spatio-temporal interest point image sampling strategies and the human fixations, as well as their impact for visual recognition performance, but also demonstrate that human fixations can be accurately predicted, and when used in an end-to-end automatic system, leveraging some of the advanced computer vision practice, can lead to state of the art results.
Stefan Mathe, Cristian Sminchisescu
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2013 Action from Still Image Dataset and Inverse Optimal Control to Learn Task Specific Visual Scanpaths
abstract
Human eye movements provide a rich source of information into the human visual processing. The complex interplay between the task and the visual stimulus is believed to determine human eye movements, yet it is not fully understood. This has precluded the development of reliable dynamic eye movement prediction systems. Our work makes three contributions towards addressing this problem. First, we complement one of the largest and most challenging static computer vision datasets, VOC 2012 Actions, with human eye movement annotations collected under the task constraints of action and context recognition. Our dataset is unique among eyetracking datasets for still images in terms of its large scale (over 1 million fixations, 9157 images), task control and action from a single image emphasis. Second, we introduce models to automatically discover areas of interest (AOI) and introduce novel dynamic consistency metrics, based on them. Our method can automatically determine the number and spatial support of the AOIs, in addition to their locations. Based on such encodings, we show that, on unconstrained read-world stimuli, task instructions have significant influence on visual behavior. Finally, we leverage our large scale dataset in conjunction with powerful machine learning techniques and computer vision features, to introduce novel dynamic eye movement prediction methods which learn task-sensitive reward functions from eye movement data and efficiently integrate these rewards to plan future saccades based on inverse optimal control. We show that the propose methodology achieves state of the art scanpath modeling results.
Stefan Mathe, Cristian Sminchisescu
NIPS1
2012 Dynamic Eye Movement Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Action Recognition
Stefan Mathe, Cristian Sminchisescu
ECCV (2)1