Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Livia Predoiu

dblp:19/3137 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 64% Database theory · 36%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
data provenance
0.412020
Provenance for the Description Logic ELHr · IJCAI 2020
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
description logic
0.412020
Provenance for the Description Logic ELHr · IJCAI 2020
Database theory › query answering
consistent query answering
0.212016
Generalized Consistent Query Answering under Existential Rules · KR 2016
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
existential rules
0.212016
Basic Probabilistic Ontological Data Exchange with Existential Rules · AAAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semiring provenance · 0.9complexity analysis · 0.5boolean event encoding · 0.5query answering · 0.2existential rules · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Provenance for the Description Logic ELHr
abstract
We address the problem of handling provenance information in ELHr ontologies. We consider a setting recently introduced for ontology-based data access, based on semirings and extending classical data provenance, in which ontology axioms are annotated with provenance tokens. A consequence inherits the provenance of the axioms involved in deriving it, yielding a provenance polynomial as an annotation. We analyse the semantics for the ELHr case and show that the presence of conjunctions poses various difficulties for handling provenance, some of which are mitigated by assuming multiplicative idempotency of the semiring. Under this assumption, we study three problems: ontology completion with provenance, computing the set of relevant axioms for a consequence, and query answering.
Camille Bourgaux, Ana Ozaki, Rafael Peñaloza, Livia Predoiu
IJCAI4
2016 Basic Probabilistic Ontological Data Exchange with Existential Rules
abstract
We study the complexity of exchanging probabilistic data between ontology-based probabilistic databases. We consider the Datalog+/- family of languages as ontology and ontology mapping languages, and we assume different compact encodings of the probabilities of the probabilistic source databases via Boolean events. We provide an extensive complexity analysis of the problem of deciding the existence of a probabilistic (universal) solution for a given probabilistic source database relative to a (probabilistic) data exchange problem for the different languages considered.
Thomas Lukasiewicz, Maria Vanina Martinez, Livia Predoiu, Gerardo I. Simari
AAAI3
2016 Complexity of Threshold Query Answering in Probabilistic Ontological Data Exchange
abstract
We study the complexity of threshold query answering in the logical framework for probabilistic ontological data exchange, which is an extension of the classical probabilistic data exchange framework with (1) probabilistic databases compactly encoded with several different annotations according to three different probability models used and (2) existential rules of different expressiveness. The ontological data exchange framework provides a logical formalization of exchanging probabilistic data and knowledge from one ontology to another via either deterministic or probabilistic mappings. We define the threshold query answering task in this framework and provide a thorough analysis of its computational complexity for different classes of existential rules and types of complexity. We also delineate several classes of existential rules and a probability model along with a compact encoding in which the threshold query answering problem can be solved in polynomial time in the data complexity.
Thomas Lukasiewicz, Livia Predoiu
ECAI2
2016 Generalized Consistent Query Answering under Existential Rules
Thomas Eiter, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Livia Predoiu
KR3
2008 Guarded hybrid knowledge bases
abstract
Abstract Recently, there has been a lot of interest in the integration of Description Logics (DL) and rules on the Semantic Web. We defineguarded hybrid knowledge bases(org-hybrid knowledge bases) as knowledge bases that consist of a Description Logic knowledge base and aguardedlogic program, similar to the $\mathcal{DL}$ +logknowledge bases from Rosati (In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 2006, pp. 68–78.). g-Hybrid knowledge bases enable an integration of Description Logics and Logic Programming where, unlike in other approaches, variables in the rules of a guarded program do not need to appear in positive non-DL atoms of the body, i.e., DL atoms can act asguardsas well. Decidability of satisfiability checking of g-hybrid knowledge bases is shown for the particular DL $\mathcal{DLRO}^{\-{le}}$ , which is close to OWL DL, by a reduction to guarded programs under the open answer set semantics. Moreover, we show 2-Exptime-completeness for satisfiability checking of such g-hybrid knowledge bases. Finally, we discuss advantages and disadvantages of our approach compared with $\mathcal{DL}$ +logknowledge bases.
Stijn Heymans, Jos de Bruijn, Livia Predoiu, Cristina Feier, Davy Van Nieuwenborgh
Theory Pract. Log. Program.3