Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Caroline Chouinard

dblp:19/3713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 44% Reinforcement learning · 22% Motion planning and robot control · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
coverage path planning
0.112008
Spatial coverage planning for a planetary rover · ICRA 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.112008
Spatial coverage planning for a planetary rover · ICRA 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning and scheduling
0.112007
Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution · ICRA 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › scheduling
rover activity planning
0.112007
Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics
planetary rover
0.022008
Spatial coverage planning for a planetary rover · ICRA 2008
Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution · ICRA 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
autonomous science
0.012007
Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution · ICRA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

onboard planning and execution · 0.1scheduling · 0.1execution · 0.1AI planning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Spatial coverage planning for a planetary rover
abstract
We are developing onboard planning and execution technologies to support the exploration and characterization of geological features by autonomous rovers. In order to generate high quality mission plans, an autonomous rover must reason about the relative importance of the observations it can perform. In this paper we look at the scientific criteria of selecting observations that improve the quality of the area covered by samples. Our approach makes use of a priori information, if available, and allows scientists to mark sub-regions of the area with relative priorities for exploration. We use an efficient algorithm for prioritizing observations based on spatial coverage that allows the system to update observation rankings as new information is gained during execution.
Daniel M. Gaines, Tara A. Estlin, Caroline Chouinard
ICRA3
2007 Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution
abstract
This paper presents technology for performing autonomous commanding of a planetary rover. Through the use of AI planning, scheduling and execution techniques, the OASIS autonomous science system provides capabilities for the automated generation of a rover activity plan based on science priorities, the handling of opportunistic science, including new science targets identified by onboard data analysis software, other dynamic decision-making such as modifying the rover activity plan in response to problems or other state and resource changes. We first describe some of the particular challenges this work has begun to address and then describe our system approach. Finally, we report on our experience testing this software with a Mars rover prototype.
Tara A. Estlin, Daniel M. Gaines, Caroline Chouinard, Rebecca Castaño, Benjamin J. Bornstein, Michele Judd, Issa A. D. Nesnas, Robert C. Anderson
ICRA3