Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Varun Gupta 0007

dblp:19/4180-7 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2633-5920ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 32% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16% Video understanding and tracking · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › human action analysis
action understanding
0.912025
VELOCITI: Benchmarking Video-Language Compositional Reasoning with Strict Entailment · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal reasoning
compositional reasoning
0.912025
VELOCITI: Benchmarking Video-Language Compositional Reasoning with Strict Entailment · CVPR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
entailment
0.912025
VELOCITI: Benchmarking Video-Language Compositional Reasoning with Strict Entailment · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language understanding
0.912025
VELOCITI: Benchmarking Video-Language Compositional Reasoning with Strict Entailment · CVPR 2025
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.712023
CueCAn: Cue-driven Contextual Attention for Identifying Missing Traffic Signs on Unconstrained Roads · ICRA 2023
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.712023
CueCAn: Cue-driven Contextual Attention for Identifying Missing Traffic Signs on Unconstrained Roads · ICRA 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › object detection for autonomous driving
traffic sign detection
0.712023
CueCAn: Cue-driven Contextual Attention for Identifying Missing Traffic Signs on Unconstrained Roads · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

entailment evaluation · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.9encoder pretraining · 0.7cue-driven contextual attention · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 VELOCITI: Benchmarking Video-Language Compositional Reasoning with Strict Entailment
abstract
A fundamental aspect of compositional reasoning in a video is associating people and their actions across time. Recent years have seen great progress in general-purpose vision/video models and a move towards long-video understanding. While exciting, we take a step back and ask: are today’s models good at compositional reasoning on short videos? To this end, we introduce VELOCITI, a benchmark to study Video-LLMs by disentangling and assessing the comprehension of agents, actions, and their associations across multiple events. We adopt the Video-Language Entailment setup and propose StrictVLE that requires correct classification (rather than ranking) of the positive and negative caption. We evaluate several models and observe that even the best, LLaVA-OneVision (44.5%) and Gemini-1.5-Pro (49.3%), are far from human accuracy at 93.0%. Results show that action understanding lags behind agents, and negative captions created using entities appearing in the video perform worse than those obtained from pure text manipulation. We also present challenges with ClassicVLE and multiple-choice (MC) evaluation, strengthening our preference for StrictVLE. Finally, we validate that our benchmark requires visual inputs of multiple frames making it ideal to study video-language compositional reasoning.
Darshana Saravanan, Varun Gupta 0007, Darshan Singh S, Zeeshan Khan, Vineet Gandhi, Makarand Tapaswi
CVPR2
2023 CueCAn: Cue-driven Contextual Attention for Identifying Missing Traffic Signs on Unconstrained Roads
abstract
Unconstrained Asian roads often involve poor infrastructure, affecting overall road safety. Missing traffic signs are a regular part of such roads. Missing or non-existing object detection has been studied for locating missing curbs and estimating reasonable regions for pedestrians on road scene images. Such methods involve analyzing task-specific single object cues. In this paper, we present the first and most challenging video dataset for missing objects, with multiple types of traffic signs for which the cues are visible without the signs in the scenes. We refer to it as the Missing Traffic Signs Video Dataset (MTSVD). MTSVD is challenging compared to the previous works in two aspects i) The traffic signs are generally not present in the vicinity of their cues, ii) The traffic signs' cues are diverse and unique. Also, MTSVD is the first publicly available missing object dataset. To train the models for identifying missing signs, we complement our dataset with 10K traffic sign tracks, with 40% of the traffic signs having cues visible in the scenes. For identifying missing signs, we propose the Cue-driven Contextual Attention units (CueCAn), which we incorporate in our model's encoder. We first train the encoder to classify the presence of traffic sign cues and then train the entire segmentation model end-to-end to localize missing traffic signs. Quantitative and qualitative analysis shows that CueCAn significantly improves the performance of base models.
Varun Gupta 0007, Anbumani Subramanian, C. V. Jawahar, Rohit Saluja
ICRA1