Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frank Verbiest

dblp:19/5812 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
3D vision · 86% Trustworthy machine learning · 14%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging
camera calibration
0.412020
Modeling the Effects of Windshield Refraction for Camera Calibration · ECCV (6) 2020
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
camera model
0.112020
Modeling the Effects of Windshield Refraction for Camera Calibration · ECCV (6) 2020
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.132004
Drift Detection and Removal for Sequential Structure from Motion Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004
Visual Modeling with a Hand-Held Camera · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2004
Surviving Dominant Planes in Uncalibrated Structure and Motion Recovery · ECCV (2) 2002
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation
0.112008
Photometric stereo with coherent outlier handling and confidence estimation · CVPR 2008
Computer vision › 3D vision
photometric stereo
0.112008
Photometric stereo with coherent outlier handling and confidence estimation · CVPR 2008
Computer vision › 3D vision
surface normal estimation
0.112008
Photometric stereo with coherent outlier handling and confidence estimation · CVPR 2008
Computer vision › 3D vision › structure from motion
bundle adjustment
0.012004
Drift Detection and Removal for Sequential Structure from Motion Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
uncalibrated reconstruction
0.012002
Surviving Dominant Planes in Uncalibrated Structure and Motion Recovery · ECCV (2) 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

refraction modeling · 0.9bundle adjustment · 0.1probabilistic imaging model · 0.1mean field inference · 0.1markov random field · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1projective transformation · 0.0nonlinear optimization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Modeling the Effects of Windshield Refraction for Camera Calibration
Frank Verbiest, Marc Proesmans, Luc Van Gool
ECCV (6)1
2008 Photometric stereo with coherent outlier handling and confidence estimation
abstract
In photometric stereo a robust method is required to deal with outliers, such as shadows and non-Lambertian reflections. In this paper we rely on a probabilistic imaging model that distinguishes between inliers and outliers, and formulate the problem as a Maximum-Likelihood estimation problem. To signal which imaging model to use a hidden binary inlier map is introduced, which, to account for the fact that inlier/outlier pixels typically group together, is modelled as a Markov Random Field. To make inference of model parameters and hidden variables tractable a mean field Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm is used. If for each pixel we add the scaled normal, i.e. albedo and normal combined, to the model parameters, it would not be possible to obtain a confidence estimate in the result. Instead, each scaled normal is added as a hidden variable, the distribution of which, approximated by a Gaussian, is also estimated in the EM algorithm. The covariance matrix of the recovered approximate Gaussian distribution serves as a confidence estimate of the scaled normal. We demonstrate experimentally the effectiveness or our approach.
Frank Verbiest, Luc Van Gool
CVPR1
2005 Combining image and model based rendering of an archaeological site
Maarten Vergauwen, Geert Willems, Frank Verbiest, Luc Van Gool, Daniel Pletinckx
Signal Process. Image Commun.3
2004 Visual Modeling with a Hand-Held Camera
Marc Pollefeys, Luc Van Gool, Maarten Vergauwen, Frank Verbiest, Kurt Cornelis, Jan Tops, Reinhard Koch
Int. J. Comput. Vis.4
2004 Drift Detection and Removal for Sequential Structure from Motion Algorithms
abstract
In sequential Structure from Motion algorithms for extended image or video sequences, error build up caused by drift poses a problem as feature tracks that normally represent a single scene point will have distinct 3D reconstructions. For the final bundle adjustment to remove this drift, it must be told about these 3D-3D correspondences through a change in the cost function. However, as a bundle adjustment is a nonlinear optimization technique, the drift needs to be removed from the supplied initial solution to allow for convergence of the bundle adjustment to the real global optimum. Before drift can be removed, it has to be detected. This is accomplished through understanding of the long term behavior of drift which leaves 3D reconstructions from short sequences intact. Drift detection boils down to identifying reconstructions of the same scene part that only differ up to a projective transformation. After detection, the drift can be removed from future processed images and an Adapted Bundle Adjustment using correspondences supplied by the drift detection can remove the drift from previous images. Several experiments on real video sequences demonstrate the merit of drift detection and removal.
Kurt Cornelis, Frank Verbiest, Luc Van Gool
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2002 Surviving Dominant Planes in Uncalibrated Structure and Motion Recovery
Marc Pollefeys, Frank Verbiest, Luc Van Gool
ECCV (2)2