Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yogatheesan Varatharajah

dblp:190/8895 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-4547-0036ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 91% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 9%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 58% Medical and health informatics · 42%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.612022
Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.612022
Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.612022
Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
EEG representation learning
0.612022
Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2022
Medical and health informatics
EEG analysis
0.312017
EEG-GRAPH: A Factor-Graph-Based Model for Capturing Spatial, Temporal, and Observational Relationships in Electroencephalograms · NIPS 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics
0.312017
EEG-GRAPH: A Factor-Graph-Based Model for Capturing Spatial, Temporal, and Observational Relationships in Electroencephalograms · NIPS 2017
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.212022
Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2022
Medical and health informatics › EEG analysis
EEG-based diagnosis
0.212022
Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
factor graphs
0.112017
EEG-GRAPH: A Factor-Graph-Based Model for Capturing Spatial, Temporal, and Observational Relationships in Electroencephalograms · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.112017
EEG-GRAPH: A Factor-Graph-Based Model for Capturing Spatial, Temporal, and Observational Relationships in Electroencephalograms · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty quantification · 1.1representation learning · 1.1data transforms · 1.1graph-cut inference · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution Shifts
abstract
The recent availability of large datasets in bio-medicine has inspired the development of representation learning methods for multiple healthcare applications. Despite advances in predictive performance, the clinical utility of such methods is limited when exposed to real-world data. This study develops model diagnostic measures to detect potential pitfalls before deployment without assuming access to external data. Specifically, we focus on modeling realistic data shifts in electrophysiological signals (EEGs) via data transforms and extend the conventional task-based evaluations with analyses of a) the model's latent space and b) predictive uncertainty under these transforms. We conduct experiments on multiple EEG feature encoders and two clinically relevant downstream tasks using publicly available large-scale clinical EEGs. Within this experimental setting, our results suggest that measures of latent space integrity and model uncertainty under the proposed data shifts may help anticipate performance degradation during deployment.
Neeraj Wagh, Jionghao Wei, Samarth Rawal, Brent M. Berry, Yogatheesan Varatharajah
NeurIPS5
2019 A Joint Model for Predicting Structural and Functional Brain Health in Elderly Individuals
abstract
This paper presents a machine-learning-based joint model of brain age and cognitive performance, and demonstrates its superior performance relative to isolated models. Previous studies have chosen to study those two measures of brain health separately for two reasons: 1) although cognition can be measured regardless of an individual's health, brain-age ground-truth can be defined only for healthy individuals; and 2) while brain-age models are developed using neuroimaging data alone, modeling of cognitive performance additionally requires measures of cognitive reserve and biomarkers of cognitive disorders. However, those two measures are biologically related to each other, because they both depend on brain structure. Hence, we developed a joint model by 1) explicitly defining the commonalities and differences between them in a graph, and 2) converting that graph into a multitask-learning model to facilitate learning from population-level data. Our model took as inputs structural neuroimaging data and information related to cognitive reserve and disorders, and predicted brain age and cognitive performance in terms of a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. We implemented linear and nonlinear joint models and compared them against isolated models. Our results indicate that joint modeling substantially improves the accuracy of the modeling of individual measures, relative to isolated models.
Yogatheesan Varatharajah, Krishnakant V. Saboo, Ravishankar K. Iyer, Scott A. Przybelski, Christopher G. Schwarz, Ronald C. Petersen, Clifford R. Jack Jr., Prashanthi Vemuri
BIBM1
2017 EEG-GRAPH: A Factor-Graph-Based Model for Capturing Spatial, Temporal, and Observational Relationships in Electroencephalograms
abstract
This paper presents a probabilistic-graphical model that can be used to infer characteristics of instantaneous brain activity by jointly analyzing spatial and temporal dependencies observed in electroencephalograms (EEG). Specifically, we describe a factor-graph-based model with customized factor-functions defined based on domain knowledge, to infer pathologic brain activity with the goal of identifying seizure-generating brain regions in epilepsy patients. We utilize an inference technique based on the graph-cut algorithm to exactly solve graph inference in polynomial time. We validate the model by using clinically collected intracranial EEG data from 29 epilepsy patients to show that the model correctly identifies seizure-generating brain regions. Our results indicate that our model outperforms two conventional approaches used for seizure-onset localization (5-7% better AUC: 0.72, 0.67, 0.65) and that the proposed inference technique provides 3-10% gain in AUC (0.72, 0.62, 0.69) compared to sampling-based alternatives.
Yogatheesan Varatharajah, Min Jin Chong, Krishnakant V. Saboo, Brent M. Berry, Benjamin H. Brinkmann, Gregory A. Worrell, Ravishankar K. Iyer
NIPS1
2017 Seizure Forecasting and the Preictal State in Canine Epilepsy
abstract
The ability to predict seizures may enable patients with epilepsy to better manage their medications and activities, potentially reducing side effects and improving quality of life. Forecasting epileptic seizures remains a challenging problem, but machine learning methods using intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) measures have shown promise. A machine-learning-based pipeline was developed to process iEEG recordings and generate seizure warnings. Results support the ability to forecast seizures at rates greater than a Poisson random predictor for all feature sets and machine learning algorithms tested. In addition, subject-specific neurophysiological changes in multiple features are reported preceding lead seizures, providing evidence supporting the existence of a distinct and identifiable preictal state.
Yogatheesan Varatharajah, Ravishankar K. Iyer, Brent M. Berry, Gregory A. Worrell, Benjamin H. Brinkmann
Int. J. Neural Syst.1