Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiafan Li

dblp:191/3101 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-1569-2983ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Graph learning · 47% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% Vision and language · 18%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › hypergraph learning
hypergraph neural network
1.012026
Learning to Think on Hypergraph: HyperCoT for Structure-Guided N-ary Knowledge Graph Completion · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph completion
1.012026
Learning to Think on Hypergraph: HyperCoT for Structure-Guided N-ary Knowledge Graph Completion · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.912025
Representation Learning with Mutual Influence of Modalities for Node Classification in Multi-Modal Heterogeneous Networks · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterogeneous graph neural network
0.912025
Representation Learning with Mutual Influence of Modalities for Node Classification in Multi-Modal Heterogeneous Networks · IJCAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal fusion
0.912025
Representation Learning with Mutual Influence of Modalities for Node Classification in Multi-Modal Heterogeneous Networks · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning
0.912025
Representation Learning with Mutual Influence of Modalities for Node Classification in Multi-Modal Heterogeneous Networks · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
0.912025
Representation Learning with Mutual Influence of Modalities for Node Classification in Multi-Modal Heterogeneous Networks · IJCAI 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › non-classical logics
temporal logic
0.912025
Learning Reliable and Intuitive Temporal Logic Rules for Interpretable Time Series Classification · KDD (2) 2025
Data mining › time series analysis
time series classification
0.912025
Learning Reliable and Intuitive Temporal Logic Rules for Interpretable Time Series Classification · KDD (2) 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.812024
Advancement in Graph Understanding: A Multimodal Benchmark and Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312025
Learning Reliable and Intuitive Temporal Logic Rules for Interpretable Time Series Classification · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.212024
Advancement in Graph Understanding: A Multimodal Benchmark and Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

signal temporal logic · 1.7neuro-symbolic learning · 1.7gradient grafting · 1.7hypergraph learning · 1.0chain-of-thought · 1.0inter-modal attention · 0.9heterogeneous graph transformer · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Learning to Think on Hypergraph: HyperCoT for Structure-Guided N-ary Knowledge Graph Completion
abstract
Mengxue Yang, Jinming Li, Chun Yang, Jiaqi Zhu, Jiafan Li, Guanhua Zhang, Ying Li. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Mengxue Yang 0001, Jiafan Li
ACL (1)5
2025 Representation Learning with Mutual Influence of Modalities for Node Classification in Multi-Modal Heterogeneous Networks
abstract
Nowadays, numerous online platforms can be described as multi-modal heterogeneous networks (MMHNs), such as Douban's movie networks and Amazon's product review networks. Accurately categorizing nodes within these networks is crucial for analyzing the corresponding entities, which requires effective representation learning on nodes. However, existing multi-modal fusion methods often adopt either early fusion strategies which may lose the unique characteristics of individual modalities, or late fusion approaches overlooking the cross-modal guidance in GNN-based information propagation. In this paper, we propose a novel model for node classification in MMHNs, named Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network with Inter-Modal Attention (HGNN-IMA). It learns node representations by capturing the mutual influence of multiple modalities during the information propagation process, within the framework of heterogeneous graph transformer. Specifically, a nested inter-modal attention mechanism is integrated into the inter-node attention to achieve adaptive multi-modal fusion, and modality alignment is also taken into account to encourage the propagation among nodes with consistent similarities across all modalities. Moreover, an attention loss is augmented to mitigate the impact of missing modalities. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of the model in the node classification task, providing an innovative view to handle multi-modal data, especially when accompanied with network structures. The full version including Appendix is available at http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07895.
Jiafan Li, Jiaqi Zhu 0001, Liang Chang 0001, Yilin Li 0003, Miaomiao Li 0007, Yang Wang 0102, Yi Yang 0060, Hongan Wang
IJCAI1
2025 Learning Reliable and Intuitive Temporal Logic Rules for Interpretable Time Series Classification
abstract
Recently, rule-based time series classification models are widely used in safety-critical scenarios demanding strong interpretability, through providing explicit and rigorous rationales. However, due to the discrepancy between discrete rules and continuous neural networks, the generated rules are not completely consistent with the actual decision-making process, rendering users hesitant to trust the model. Additionally, existing methods learn the role (weight) of each time point independently, which is not in line with human understanding and the consecutive nature of temporal properties. In this paper, we propose a novel neuro-symbolic model named TemporalRule, aiming to automatically learn Signal Temporal Logic (STL) rules for interpretable time series classification. Our model directly optimizes the neural networks representing discrete rules via gradient grafting, producing reliable rules that can exactly determine the classification results. Notably, a temporal logical layer is designed to simulate expressive temporal operators, including one 2-predicate operator (Until) and two 2-level composite operators (EA and AE), through adaptively learning the time bounds of involved intervals. That creates consistent weights for consecutive time points, enhancing the intuitiveness of derived rules. Extensive experiments on diverse real-world datasets in safety-critical domains show that TemporalRule achieves superior and stable classification accuracy compared to state-of-the-art rule-based approaches, and the learned rules can precisely and concisely explicate the classification results, leading to a trustable model.
Yang Wang 0102, Jiaqi Zhu 0001, Miaomiao Li 0007, Yilin Li 0003, Yi Yang 0060, Jiafan Li, Hongan Wang
KDD (2)7
2024 Advancement in Graph Understanding: A Multimodal Benchmark and Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models
abstract
Qihang Ai, Jiafan Li, Jincheng Dai, Jianwu Zhou, Lemao Liu, Haiyun Jiang, Shuming Shi. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Qihang Ai, Jiafan Li, Jincheng Dai, Jianwu Zhou, Lemao Liu, Haiyun Jiang, Shuming Shi 0001
ACL (1)2
2017 Overall quality evaluation of graph layouts based on regression analysis
abstract
Combining1 subjective evaluation with aesthetic criteria, this paper proposes an objective overall quality assessment method for graph layout algorithms. Firstly, we build the subjective rating database of graph layouts. The subjective experiment is designed to rate different graph layouts. Then, for each graph layout, we use the readability metrics of the layout as independent variables, the subjective score of users as the dependent variable, to establish the regression model. Through the regression model, we can get the overall quality score of a graph layout.
Jiafan Li, Changbo Wang, Yuhua Liu, Zhijie Qiao
VINCI1
2016 When Amdahl Meets Young/Daly
abstract
This paper investigates the optimal number of processors to execute a parallel job, whose speedup profile obeys Amdahl's law, on a large-scale platform subject to fail-stop and silent errors. We combine the traditional checkpointing and rollback recovery strategies with verification mechanisms to cope with both error sources. We provide an exact formula to express the execution overhead incurred by a periodic checkpointing pattern of length T and with P processors, and we give first-order approximations for the optimal values T* and P* as a function of the individual processor failure rate λind. A striking result is that P* is of the order λind-1/4if the checkpointing cost grows linearly with the number of processors, and of the order λind-1/3if the checkpointing cost stays bounded for any P. We conduct an extensive set of simulations to support the theoretical study. The results confirm the accuracy of first-order approximation under a wide range of parameter settings.
Aurélien Cavelan, Jiafan Li, Yves Robert, Hongyang Sun 0001
CLUSTER2