Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mónica Domínguez
dblp:191/6049
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › abusive language detection
hate speech detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Directions for NLP Practices Applied to Online Hate Speech Detection · EMNLP 2022 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › social media analysis
online hate speech |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Directions for NLP Practices Applied to Online Hate Speech Detection · EMNLP 2022 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Directions for NLP Practices Applied to Online Hate Speech DetectionabstractAddressing hate speech in online spaces has been conceptualized as a classification task that uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques.Through this conceptualization, the hate speech detection task has relied on common conventions and practices from NLP.For instance, inter-annotator agreement is conceptualized as a way to measure dataset quality and certain metrics and benchmarks are used to assure model generalization.However, hate speech is a deeply complex and situated concept that eludes such static and disembodied practices.In this position paper, we critically reflect on these methodologies for hate speech detection, we argue that many conventions in NLP are poorly suited for the problem and encourage researchers to develop methods that are more appropriate for the task. Paula Fortuna, Mónica Domínguez, Leo Wanner, Zeerak Talat |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2021 | ThemePro 2.0: Showcasing the Role of Thematic Progression in Engaging Human-Computer Interaction
Mónica Domínguez, Juan Soler Company, Leo Wanner |
Interspeech | 1 |
| 2020 | ThemePro: A Toolkit for the Analysis of Thematic ProgressionabstractThis paper introduces ThemePro, a toolkit for the automatic analysis of thematic progression. Thematic progression is relevant to natural language processing (NLP) applications dealing, among others, with discourse structure, argumentation structure, natural language generation, summarization and topic detection. A web platform demonstrates the potential of this toolkit and provides a visualization of the results including syntactic trees, hierarchical thematicity over propositions and thematic progression over whole texts. Mónica Domínguez, Juan Soler Company, Leo Wanner |
LREC | 1 |
| 2019 | PyToBI: A Toolkit for ToBI Labeling Under Python
Mónica Domínguez, Patrick Louis Rohrer, Juan Soler Company |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2018 | Compilation of Corpora for the Study of the Information Structure-Prosody Interface
Alicia Burga, Mónica Domínguez, Mireia Farrús, Leo Wanner |
LREC | 2 |
| 2017 | A Thematicity-Based Prosody Enrichment Tool for CTS
Mónica Domínguez, Mireia Farrús, Leo Wanner |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2016 | An Automatic Prosody Tagger for Spontaneous SpeechabstractSpeech prosody is known to be central in advanced communication technologies. However, despite the advances of theoretical studies in speech prosody, so far, no large scale prosody annotated resources that would facilitate empirical research and the development of empirical computational approaches are available. This is to a large extent due to the fact that current common prosody annotation conventions offer a descriptive framework of intonation contours and phrasing based on labels. This makes it difficult to reach a satisfactory inter-annotator agreement during the annotation of gold standard annotations and, subsequently, to create consistent large scale annotations. To address this problem, we present an annotation schema for prominence and boundary labeling of prosodic phrases based upon acoustic parameters and a tagger for prosody annotation at the prosodic phrase level. Evaluation proves that inter-annotator agreement reaches satisfactory values, from 0.60 to 0.80 Cohen’s kappa, while the prosody tagger achieves acceptable recall and f-measure figures for five spontaneous samples used in the evaluation of monologue and dialogue formats in English and Spanish. The work presented in this paper is a first step towards a semi-automatic acquisition of large corpora for empirical prosodic analysis. Mónica Domínguez, Mireia Farrús, Leo Wanner |
COLING | 1 |