Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philip D. Baldoni
dblp:191/9466
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 36% Motion planning and robot control · 24% Robot navigation and mapping · 18% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
active perception |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Which Side to Scan: Multi-View Informed Active Perception with Side Scan Sonar for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
autonomous underwater vehicle |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Which Side to Scan: Multi-View Informed Active Perception with Side Scan Sonar for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Which Side to Scan: Multi-View Informed Active Perception with Side Scan Sonar for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-agent Receding Horizon Search with Terminal Cost · ICRA 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
multi-agent path finding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-agent Receding Horizon Search with Terminal Cost · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › online motion planning
receding horizon planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-agent Receding Horizon Search with Terminal Cost · ICRA 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Which Side to Scan: Multi-View Informed Active Perception with Side Scan Sonar for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles · ICRA 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent search |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-agent Receding Horizon Search with Terminal Cost · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
side scan sonar · 0.8graph neural network · 0.8adaptive surveying · 0.8terminal cost · 0.5sequentially allocated optimal path planner · 0.5decentralized monte carlo tree search · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Learning Which Side to Scan: Multi-View Informed Active Perception with Side Scan Sonar for Autonomous Underwater VehiclesabstractAutonomous underwater vehicles often perform surveys that capture multiple views of targets in order to provide more information for human operators or automatic target recognition algorithms. In this work, we address the problem of choosing the most informative views that minimize survey time while maximizing classifier accuracy. We introduce a novel active perception framework for multi-view adaptive surveying and reacquisition using side scan sonar imagery. Our framework addresses this challenge by using a graph formulation for the adaptive survey task. We then use Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to both classify acquired sonar views and to choose the next best view based on the collected data. We evaluate our method using simulated surveys in a high-fidelity side scan sonar simulator. Our results demonstrate that our approach is able to surpass the state-of-the-art in classification accuracy and survey efficiency. This framework is a promising approach for more efficient autonomous missions involving side scan sonar, such as underwater exploration, marine archaeology, and environmental monitoring. Advaith Venkatramanan Sethuraman, Philip D. Baldoni, Katherine A. Skinner, James McMahon |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2023 | Simultaneous Survey and Inspection with Autonomous Underwater VehiclesabstractAs the future of autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) deployments tends to multi-vehicle systems, new approaches in coordination and control are needed. In this work, we consider the problem of simultaneous survey and inspection where one vehicle dynamically discovers objects while another vehicle must inspect as many of the objects as possible over the course of the mission. This requires a fully autonomous inspection vehicle, and to this end, we present a planning approach which couples sampling-based motion planning with timed roadmap constraints as well as a real-time execution framework. The methods presented address the underlying challenges that arise during simultaneous survey and inspection using AUVs, namely those of communication constraints, safety of navigation constraints, and dynamically discovered tasks. Additionally, we present field results for the simultaneous survey and inspection mission using teamed AUVs. James McMahon, Riley Parker, Philip D. Baldoni, Stuart Anstee, Erion Plaku |
IROS | 3 |
| 2022 | Non-Submodular Maximization via the Greedy Algorithm and the Effects of Limited Information in Multi-Agent ExecutionabstractWe provide theoretical bounds on the worst case performance of the greedy algorithm in seeking to maximize a normalized, monotone, but not necessarily submodular ob-jective function under a simple partition matroid constraint. We also provide worst case bounds on the performance of the greedy algorithm in the case that limited information is available at each planning step. We specifically consider limited information as a result of unreliable communications during distributed execution of the greedy algorithm. We utilize notions of curvature for normalized, monotone set functions to develop the bounds provided in this work. To demonstrate the value of the bounds provided in this work, we analyze a variant of the benefit of search objective function and show, using real-world data collected by an autonomous underwater vehicle, that theoretical approximation guarantees are achieved despite non-submodularity of the objective function. Benjamin Biggs, James McMahon, Philip D. Baldoni, Daniel J. Stilwell |
IROS | 3 |
| 2021 | Multi-agent Receding Horizon Search with Terminal CostabstractWe present a multi-agent approach to receding horizon path planning that utilizes terminal costs. We show that the value of the receding horizon paths produced using the proposed methods have a guaranteed lower bound that can be determined using any readily-available, naive solution. We present a modified sequentially allocated optimal path planner with terminal costs that is guaranteed to satisfy the assumptions required to provide a guaranteed lower bound. We utilize a slightly modified version of the Decentralized Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm to solve for near-optimal paths within a short planning horizon with an appended terminal cost to demonstrate the flexibility of the proposed method. We compare these receding horizon methods that incorporate a terminal cost to related receding horizon methods that do not incorporate a terminal cost. Our approach is developed specifically for multiple agents engaged in search, but can be easily adapted for other information gathering applications. Benjamin Biggs, James McMahon, Philip D. Baldoni, Daniel J. Stilwell |
ICRA | 3 |