Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Seongwon Jang

dblp:193/7242 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-9651-8167ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › entity representation learning
item embedding
0.412020
CITIES: Contextual Inference of Tail-item Embeddings for Sequential Recommendation · ICDM 2020
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation
0.412020
CITIES: Contextual Inference of Tail-item Embeddings for Sequential Recommendation · ICDM 2020
Recommender systems
cold-start recommendation
0.412019
MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendation · KDD 2019
Recommender systems › cold-start recommendation
meta-learning for recommendation
0.412019
MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendation · KDD 2019
Recommender systems › user modeling
user preference estimation
0.412019
MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendation · KDD 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

embedding inference · 0.9contextual inference · 0.9meta-learning · 0.4evidence candidate selection · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Towards Proper Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning Strategies for Music Audio Representation
abstract
The common research goal of self-supervised learning is to extract a general representation which an arbitrary downstream task would benefit from. In this work, we investigate music audio representation learned from different contrastive self-supervised learning schemes and empirically evaluate the embedded vectors on various music information retrieval (MIR) tasks where different levels of the music perception are concerned. We analyze the results to discuss the proper direction of contrastive learning strategies for different MIR tasks. We show that these representations convey a comprehensive information about the auditory characteristics of music in general, although each of the self-supervision strategies has its own effectiveness in certain aspect of information.
Jeong Choi, Seongwon Jang, Hyunsouk Cho, Sehee Chung
ICME2
2020 CITIES: Contextual Inference of Tail-item Embeddings for Sequential Recommendation
abstract
Sequential recommendation techniques provide users with product recommendations fitting their current preferences by handling dynamic user preferences over time. Previous studies have focused on modeling sequential dynamics without much regard to which of the best-selling products (i.e., head items) or niche products (i.e., tail items) should be recommended. We scrutinize the structural reason for why tail items are barely served in the current sequential recommendation model, which consists of an item-embedding layer, a sequence-modeling layer, and a recommendation layer. Well-designed sequence-modeling and recommendation layers are expected to naturally learn suitable item embeddings. However, tail items are likely to fall short of this expectation because the current model structure is not suitable for learning high-quality embeddings with insufficient data. Thus, tail items are rarely recommended. To eliminate this issue, we propose a framework called CITIES, which aims to enhance the quality of the tail-item embeddings by training an embedding-inference function using multiple contextual head items so that the recommendation performance improves for not only the tail items but also for the head items. Moreover, our framework can infer new-item embeddings without an additional learning process. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets show that applying CITIES to the state-of-the-art methods improves recommendation performance for both tail and head items. We conduct an additional experiment to verify that CITIES can infer suitable new-item embeddings as well.
Seongwon Jang, Hoyeop Lee, Hyunsouk Cho, Sehee Chung
ICDM1
2019 MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendation
abstract
This paper proposes a recommender system to alleviate the cold-start problem that can estimate user preferences based on only a small number of items. To identify a user's preference in the cold state, existing recommender systems, such as Netflix, initially provide items to a user; we call those items evidence candidates. Recommendations are then made based on the items selected by the user. Previous recommendation studies have two limitations: (1) the users who consumed a few items have poor recommendations and (2) inadequate evidence candidates are used to identify user preferences. We propose a meta-learning-based recommender system called MeLU to overcome these two limitations. From meta-learning, which can rapidly adopt new task with a few examples, MeLU can estimate new user's preferences with a few consumed items. In addition, we provide an evidence candidate selection strategy that determines distinguishing items for customized preference estimation. We validate MeLU with two benchmark datasets, and the proposed model reduces at least 5.92% mean absolute error than two comparative models on the datasets. We also conduct a user study experiment to verify the evidence selection strategy.
Hoyeop Lee, Jinbae Im, Seongwon Jang, Hyunsouk Cho, Sehee Chung
KDD3
2017 Real-time contrasts control chart using random forests with weighted voting
Seongwon Jang, Seung Hwan Park, Jun-Geol Baek
Expert Syst. Appl.1