Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Roussillon

dblp:193/9492 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-2483-4160ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 50% Rendering · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Rendering
level of detail
0.612022
Moving level-of-detail surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
point cloud reconstruction
0.612022
Moving level-of-detail surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.412020
Faster Wasserstein Distance Estimation with the Sinkhorn Divergence · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein distance estimation
0.412020
Faster Wasserstein Distance Estimation with the Sinkhorn Divergence · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
distribution comparison
0.112020
Faster Wasserstein Distance Estimation with the Sinkhorn Divergence · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sinkhorn algorithm · 0.9richardson extrapolation · 0.9entropic regularization · 0.9octree refinement · 0.6moving least squares · 0.6algebraic point set surfaces · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Moving level-of-detail surfaces
abstract
We present a simple, fast, and smooth scheme to approximate Algebraic Point Set Surfaces using non-compact kernels, which is particularly suited for filtering and reconstructing point sets presenting large missing parts. Our key idea is to consider a moving level-of-detail of the input point set which is adaptive w.r.t. to the evaluation location, just such as the samples weights are output sensitive in the traditional moving least squares scheme. We also introduce an adaptive progressive octree refinement scheme, driven by the resulting implicit surface, to properly capture the modeled geometry even far away from the input samples. Similarly to typical compactly-supported approximations, our operator runs in logarithmic time while defining high quality surfaces even on challenging inputs for which only global optimizations achieve reasonable results. We demonstrate our technique on a variety of point sets featuring geometric noise as well as large holes.
Corentin Mercier, Thibault Lescoat, Pierre Roussillon, Tamy Boubekeur, Jean-Marc Thiery
ACM Trans. Graph.3
2020 Faster Wasserstein Distance Estimation with the Sinkhorn Divergence
abstract
The squared Wasserstein distance is a natural quantity to compare probability distributions in a non-parametric setting. This quantity is usually estimated with the plug-in estimator, defined via a discrete optimal transport problem which can be solved to $\epsilon$-accuracy by adding an entropic regularization of order $\epsilon$ and using for instance Sinkhorn's algorithm. In this work, we propose instead to estimate it with the Sinkhorn divergence, which is also built on entropic regularization but includes debiasing terms. We show that, for smooth densities, this estimator has a comparable sample complexity but allows higher regularization levels, of order $\epsilon^{1/2}$, which leads to improved computational complexity bounds and a strong speedup in practice. Our theoretical analysis covers the case of both randomly sampled densities and deterministic discretizations on uniform grids. We also propose and analyze an estimator based on Richardson extrapolation of the Sinkhorn divergence which enjoys improved statistical and computational efficiency guarantees, under a condition on the regularity of the approximation error, which is in particular satisfied for Gaussian densities. We finally demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed estimators with numerical experiments.
Lénaïc Chizat, Pierre Roussillon, Flavien Léger, François-Xavier Vialard, Gabriel Peyré
NeurIPS2
2019 Fast and Scalable Optimal Transport for Brain Tractograms
Jean Feydy, Pierre Roussillon, Alain Trouvé, Pietro Gori
MICCAI (3)2
2016 Kernel Metrics on Normal Cycles and Application to Curve Matching
abstract
In this work we introduce a new dissimilarity measure for shape registration using the notion of normal cycles, a concept from geometric measure theory which allows us to generalize curvature for nonsmooth subsets of the Euclidean space. Our construction is based on the definition of kernel metrics on the space of normal cycles which take explicit expressions in a discrete setting. This approach is closely similar to previous works based on currents and varifolds [M. Vaillant and J. Glaunès, Surface matching via currents, in Information Processing in Medical Imaging, G. E. Christensen and M. Sonka, eds., Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 3565, Springer, Berlin, 2005, pp. 381--392; N. Charon and A. Trouvé, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 6 (2013), pp. 2547--2580]. We derive the computational setting for discrete curves in $\mathbb{R}^3$, using the large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping framework as the model for deformations. We present synthetic and real data experiments and compare them with the currents and varifolds approaches.
Pierre Roussillon, Joan Glaunès
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.1