Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vivak Patel
dblp:193/9621
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4130-0897ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 75% Time series and sequential data · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Global Convergence and Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Global Convergence and Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
stationarity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Global Convergence and Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Global Convergence and Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic approximation theory · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Revisiting the problem of learning long-term dependencies in recurrent neural networks
Liam Johnston, Vivak Patel, Yumian Cui, Prasanna Balaprakash |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 2022 | Global Convergence and Stability of Stochastic Gradient DescentabstractIn machine learning, stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is widely deployed to train models using highly non-convex objectives with equally complex noise models. Unfortunately, SGD theory often makes restrictive assumptions that fail to capture the non-convexity of real problems, and almost entirely ignore the complex noise models that exist in practice. In this work, we demonstrate the restrictiveness of these assumptions using three canonical models in machine learning. Then, we develop novel theory to address this shortcoming in two ways. First, we establish that SGD's iterates will either globally converge to a stationary point or diverge under nearly arbitrary nonconvexity and noise models. Under a slightly more restrictive assumption on the joint behavior of the non-convexity and noise model that generalizes current assumptions in the literature, we show that the objective function cannot diverge, even if the iterates diverge. As a consequence of our results, SGD can be applied to a greater range of stochastic optimization problems with confidence about its global convergence behavior and stability. Vivak Patel, Shushu Zhang |
NeurIPS | 1 |