Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Assaf Kartowsky

dblp:194/3121 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-7051-8700ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory › communication channels › channel comparison
channel degradation
0.412019
Greedy-Merge Degrading has Optimal Power-Law · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

power law analysis · 0.4binary-input algorithm design · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Greedy-Merge Degrading has Optimal Power-Law
abstract
Consider a channel with a given input alphabet size and input distribution. Our aim is to degrade or upgrade it to a channel with at most L output letters. Channel Q is degraded with respect to a channel W if Q can be obtained from W by processing the output of W. Upgrading is the inverse relation. This paper contains four main results. The first result, from which the paper title is derived, deals with the so called “greedy-merge” algorithm. We derive an upper bound on the reduction in mutual information between input and output, as a function of L. This upper bound is within a constant factor of an algorithm-independent lower bound. Thus, we establish that greedy-merge is optimal in the power-law sense (i.e. the power of L). The other main results deal with upgrading. The second result shows that a certain sequence of channels, which was previously shown to be “hard” for degrading, displays the same hardness in the context of upgrading. That is, suppose we are given such a channel and a corresponding input distribution. If we upgrade (degrade) to a new channel with L output letters, we incur an increase (decrease) in mutual information between input and output. We show that a previously derived bound on the decrease in mutual information for the degrading case is also a lower bound on the increase for the upgrading case. The third result is an efficient algorithm for optimal upgrading, in the binary-input case. That is, we are given a channel and an input distribution. We must find an upgraded channel with L output letters, for which the increase in mutual information is minimal. We give a simple characterization of such a channel, which implies an efficient algorithm. The fourth result is an analog of the first result for the upgrading case when the input is binary. That is, we first present a sub-optimal algorithm for the setting considered in the third result. The main advantage of the sub-optimal algorithm is that it is amenable to analysis. We carry out the analysis and show that the increase incurred in mutual information is within a constant factor of the lower bound derived in the second result.
Assaf Kartowsky, Ido Tal
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2017 Greedy-merge degrading has optimal power-law
abstract
Consider a channel with a given input distribution. Our aim is to degrade it to a channel with at most L output letters. One such degradation method is the so called “greedy-merge” algorithm. We derive an upper bound on the reduction in mutual information between input and output. For fixed input alphabet size and variable L, the upper bound is within a constant factor of an algorithm-independent lower bound. Thus, we establish that greedy-merge is optimal in the power-law sense.
Assaf Kartowsky, Ido Tal
ISIT1