Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leonard Lausen
dblp:194/3584
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 55% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% Language models and text generation · 9% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 56% High-performance computing · 44% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program synthesis and code generation · 87% Program analysis · 13% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
code completion |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Large Language Models of Code Fail at Completing Code with Potential Bugs · NeurIPS 2023 Better Context Makes Better Code Language Models: A Case Study on Function Call Argument Completion · AAAI 2023 |
High-performance computing
large-scale training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding Silent Data Corruption in LLM Training · ACL (1) 2025 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
silent data corruption |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding Silent Data Corruption in LLM Training · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › symmetry-aware learning
permutation invariance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | HyTrel: Hypergraph-enhanced Tabular Data Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
structural inductive bias |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | HyTrel: Hypergraph-enhanced Tabular Data Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
tabular representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | HyTrel: Hypergraph-enhanced Tabular Data Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep learning systems
deep learning framework |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GluonCV and GluonNLP: Deep Learning in Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video prediction
precipitation nowcasting |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep Learning for Precipitation Nowcasting: A Benchmark and A New Model · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep Learning for Precipitation Nowcasting: A Benchmark and A New Model · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
spatiotemporal forecasting |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep Learning for Precipitation Nowcasting: A Benchmark and A New Model · NIPS 2017 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding Silent Data Corruption in LLM Training · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | HyTrel: Hypergraph-enhanced Tabular Data Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Better Context Makes Better Code Language Models: A Case Study on Function Call Argument Completion · AAAI 2023 |
Environmental and earth informatics
weather forecasting |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Deep Learning for Precipitation Nowcasting: A Benchmark and A New Model · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synchronization mechanisms · 0.9deterministic execution · 0.9XLA compiler · 0.9program analyzer · 0.7post-hoc mitigation · 0.7hypergraph neural network · 0.7hyperedge construction · 0.7code language model · 0.7optical flow · 0.6convolutional LSTM · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Understanding Silent Data Corruption in LLM TrainingabstractAs the scale of training large language models (LLMs) increases, one emergent failure is silent data corruption (SDC), where hardware produces incorrect computations without explicit failure signals.In this work, we are the first to investigate the impact of real-world SDCs on LLM training by comparing model training between healthy production nodes and unhealthy nodes exhibiting SDCs.With the help from a cloud computing platform, we access the unhealthy nodes that were swept out from production by automated fleet management.Using deterministic execution via XLA compiler and our proposed synchronization mechanisms, we isolate and analyze the impact of SDC errors on these nodes at three levels: at each submodule computation, at a single optimizer step, and at a training period.Our results reveal that the impact of SDCs on computation varies on different unhealthy nodes.Although in most cases the perturbations from SDCs on submodule computation and gradients are relatively small, SDCs can lead models to converge to different optima with different weights and even cause spikes in the training loss.Our analysis sheds light on further understanding and mitigating the impact of SDCs. Jeffrey Jian Ma, Hengzhi Pei, Leonard Lausen, George Karypis |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | When Silicon Fails Silently: Characterizing Hardware-Induced Corruption in LLM TrainingabstractAs the scale of training large language models (LLMs) increases, one emergent failure is silent data corruption (SDC), where hardware produces incorrect computations without explicit failure signals. In this work, we summarize the first investigation of the impact of real-world SDCs on LLM training presented in our ACL work [1]. In our investigation, we compare model training between healthy production nodes and unhealthy nodes exhibiting SDCs. With the help from a cloud computing platform, we access the unhealthy nodes that were swept out from production by automated fleet management. Using deterministic execution via XLA compiler and our proposed synchronization mechanisms, we isolate and analyze the impact of SDC errors on these nodes at three levels: at each submodule computation, at a single optimizer step, and at a training period. Our results reveal that the impact of SDCs on computation varies on different unhealthy nodes. Although in most cases the perturbations from SDCs on submodule computation and gradients are relatively small, SDCs can lead models to converge to different optima with different weights and even cause spikes in the training loss. Jeffrey Jian Ma, Hengzhi Pei, Leonard Lausen, George Karypis |
IOLTS | 3 |
| 2023 | Better Context Makes Better Code Language Models: A Case Study on Function Call Argument CompletionabstractPretrained code language models have enabled great progress towards program synthesis. However, common approaches only consider in-file local context and thus miss information and constraints imposed by other parts of the codebase and its external dependencies. Existing code completion benchmarks also lack such context. To resolve these restrictions we curate a new dataset of permissively licensed Python packages that includes full projects and their dependencies and provide tools to extract non-local information with the help of program analyzers. We then focus on the task of function call argument completion which requires predicting the arguments to function calls. We show that existing code completion models do not yield good results on our completion task. To better solve this task, we query a program analyzer for information relevant to a given function call, and consider ways to provide the analyzer results to different code completion models during inference and training. Our experiments show that providing access to the function implementation and function usages greatly improves the argument completion performance. Our ablation study provides further insights on how different types of information available from the program analyzer and different ways of incorporating the information affect the model performance. Hengzhi Pei, Jinman Zhao, Leonard Lausen, Sheng Zha, George Karypis |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2023 | HyTrel: Hypergraph-enhanced Tabular Data Representation LearningabstractLanguage models pretrained on large collections of tabular data have demonstrated their effectiveness in several downstream tasks.
However, many of these models do not take into account the row/column permutation invariances, hierarchical structure, etc. that exist in tabular data. To alleviate these limitations, we propose HyTrel, a tabular language model, that captures the permutation invariances and three more structural properties of tabular data by using hypergraphs--where the table cells make up the nodes and the cells occurring jointly together in each row, column, and the entire table are used to form three different types of hyperedges. We show that
HyTrel is maximally invariant under certain conditions for tabular data, i.e., two tables obtain the same representations via HyTrel
iff the two tables are identical up to permutation. Our empirical results demonstrate that HyTrel consistently outperforms other competitive baselines on four downstream tasks with minimal pretraining, illustrating the advantages of incorporating inductive biases associated with tabular data into the representations. Finally, our qualitative analyses showcase that HyTrel can assimilate the table structure to generate robust representations for the cells, rows, columns, and the entire table. Soumajyoti Sarkar, Leonard Lausen, Sheng Zha, Ruihong Huang, George Karypis |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Large Language Models of Code Fail at Completing Code with Potential BugsabstractLarge language models of code (Code-LLMs) have recently brought tremendous advances to code completion, a fundamental feature of programming assistance and code intelligence. However, most existing works ignore the possible presence of bugs in the code context for generation, which are inevitable in software development. Therefore, we introduce and study the buggy-code completion problem, inspired by the realistic scenario of real-time code suggestion where the code context contains potential bugs – anti-patterns that can become bugs in the completed program. To systematically study the task, we introduce two datasets: one with synthetic bugs derived from semantics-altering operator changes (buggy-HumanEval) and one with realistic bugs derived from user submissions to coding problems (buggy-FixEval). We find that the presence of potential bugs significantly degrades the generation performance of the high-performing Code-LLMs. For instance, the passing rates of CODEGEN-2B-MONO on test cases of buggy-HumanEval drop more than 50% given a single potential bug in the context. Finally, we investigate several post-hoc methods for mitigating the adverse effect of potential bugs and find that there remains a large gap in post-mitigation performance. Tuan Dinh, Jinman Zhao, Samson Tan, Renato Negrinho, Leonard Lausen, Sheng Zha, George Karypis |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2022 | Exploring the Role of Task Transferability in Large-Scale Multi-Task LearningabstractVishakh Padmakumar, Leonard Lausen, Miguel Ballesteros, Sheng Zha, He He, George Karypis. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Vishakh Padmakumar, Leonard Lausen, Miguel Ballesteros, Sheng Zha, He He 0001, George Karypis |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2020 | GluonCV and GluonNLP: Deep Learning in Computer Vision and Natural Language ProcessingabstractWe present GluonCV and GluonNLP, the deep learning toolkits for computer vision and natural language processing based on Apache MXNet (incubating). These toolkits provide state-of-the-art pre-trained models, training scripts, and training logs, to facilitate rapid prototyping and promote reproducible research. We also provide modular APIs with flexible building blocks to enable efficient customization. Leveraging the MXNet ecosystem, the deep learning models in GluonCV and GluonNLP can be deployed onto a variety of platforms with different programming languages. The Apache 2.0 license has been adopted by GluonCV and GluonNLP to allow for software distribution, modification, and usage. He He 0001, Tong He 0002, Leonard Lausen, Mu Li 0003, Haibin Lin, Xingjian Shi, Chenguang Wang 0001, Junyuan Xie, Sheng Zha, Aston Zhang, Hang Zhang 0005, Zhi Zhang 0005, Shuai Zheng 0004, Yi Zhu 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2017 | Deep Learning for Precipitation Nowcasting: A Benchmark and A New ModelabstractWith the goal of making high-resolution forecasts of regional rainfall, precipitation nowcasting has become an important and fundamental technology underlying various public services ranging from rainstorm warnings to flight safety. Recently, the Convolutional LSTM (ConvLSTM) model has been shown to outperform traditional optical flow based methods for precipitation nowcasting, suggesting that deep learning models have a huge potential for solving the problem. However, the convolutional recurrence structure in ConvLSTM-based models is location-invariant while natural motion and transformation (e.g., rotation) are location-variant in general. Furthermore, since deep-learning-based precipitation nowcasting is a newly emerging area, clear evaluation protocols have not yet been established. To address these problems, we propose both a new model and a benchmark for precipitation nowcasting. Specifically, we go beyond ConvLSTM and propose the Trajectory GRU (TrajGRU) model that can actively learn the location-variant structure for recurrent connections. Besides, we provide a benchmark that includes a real-world large-scale dataset from the Hong Kong Observatory, a new training loss, and a comprehensive evaluation protocol to facilitate future research and gauge the state of the art. Xingjian Shi, Zhihan Gao 0001, Leonard Lausen, Hao Wang 0014, Dit-Yan Yeung, Wai-Kin Wong, Wang-chun Woo |
NIPS | 3 |