Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yiqian Liu

dblp:194/5529 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 61% Performance modeling and evaluation · 30% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.712023
Choosing the Best Parallelization and Implementation Styles for Graph Analytics Codes: Lessons Learned from 1106 Programs · SC 2023
Parallel and multicore computing
graph processing
0.712023
Choosing the Best Parallelization and Implementation Styles for Graph Analytics Codes: Lessons Learned from 1106 Programs · SC 2023
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel graph algorithms
0.712023
Choosing the Best Parallelization and Implementation Styles for Graph Analytics Codes: Lessons Learned from 1106 Programs · SC 2023
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU computing
0.212023
Choosing the Best Parallelization and Implementation Styles for Graph Analytics Codes: Lessons Learned from 1106 Programs · SC 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel c++ · 0.7OpenMP · 0.7CUDA · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 FB-4D: Spatial-Temporal Coherent Dynamic 3D Content Generation with Feature Banks
abstract
With the rapid advancements in diffusion models and 3D generation techniques, dynamic 3D content generation has become a crucial research area. However, achieving high-fidelity 4D (dynamic 3D) generation with strong spatial-temporal consistency remains a challenging task. Inspired by recent findings that pretrained diffusion features capture rich correspondences, we propose FB-4D, a novel 4D generation framework that integrates a Feature Bank mechanism to enhance both spatial and temporal consistency in generated frames. In FB-4D, we store features extracted from previous frames and fuse them into the process of generating subsequent frames, ensuring consistent characteristics across both time and multiple views. To ensure a compact representation, the Feature Bank is updated by a proposed dynamic merging mechanism. Leveraging this Feature Bank, we demonstrate for the first time that generating additional reference sequences through multiple autoregressive iterations can continuously improve generation performance. Experimental results show that FB-4D significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of rendering quality, spatial-temporal consistency, and robustness. It surpasses all multi-view generation tuning-free approaches by a large margin and achieves performance on par with training-based methods. Our code and data will be publicly available to support future research.
Huan-ang Gao, Wenyi Li 0001, Haohan Chi, Chenxi Du, Yiqian Liu, Mingju Gao, Guiyu Zhang, Zongzheng Zhang, Li Yi 0001, Hongyang Li 0001, Hao Zhao 0002
WACV7
2023 Choosing the Best Parallelization and Implementation Styles for Graph Analytics Codes: Lessons Learned from 1106 Programs
abstract
Graph analytics has become a major workload in recent years. The underlying core algorithms tend to be irregular and data dependent, making them challenging to parallelize. Yet, these algorithms can be implemented and parallelized in many ways for CPUs and even more ways for GPUs. We took 6 key graph algorithms and created hundreds of CUDA, OpenMP, and parallel C++ versions of each of them, most of which have never been described or studied. To determine which parallelization and implementation styles work well and under what circumstances, we evaluated the resulting 1106 programs on 2 GPUs and 2 CPUs using 5 input graphs. Our results show which styles and combinations perform well and which ones should be avoided. We found that choosing the wrong implementation style can yield over a 10× slowdown on average. The worst combinations of styles can cost 6 orders of magnitude in performance.
Yiqian Liu, Noushin Azami, Avery Vanausdal, Martin Burtscher
SC1
2022 The Indigo Program-Verification Microbenchmark Suite of Irregular Parallel Code Patterns
abstract
Irregular programs are found in many domains and tend to exhibit input-dependent control flow and memory accesses. This paper introduces the Indigo suite of important irregular parallel code patterns for testing verification and other tools. We studied many irregular CPU and GPU programs and extracted the key code patterns. Then, we methodically built variations of these patterns to alter the control-flow and memory-access behavior and/or introduce bugs, yielding the thousands of OpenMP and CUDA microbenchmarks in the suite. Indigo includes a set of generators to systematically create an unbounded number of inputs for each microbenchmark, which is essential to exercise the wide range of possible behaviors of input-dependent codes. To manage the millions of code and input combinations, Indigo provides the flexibility to generate user-defined subsets of the suite. Experiments with a subset of buggy and bug-free codes illustrate that irregular programs pose a significant challenge to both static and dynamic program verification tools. Moreover, such tools can perform quite differently across code patterns that contain the same bug.
Yiqian Liu, Noushin Azami, Corbin Walters, Martin Burtscher
ISPASS1
2020 Resource Regulation Strategy Based on Resource Allocation Benefitstate Transition in 5G Fronthaul
abstract
We propose an online resource regulation strategy based on resource allocation benefit-state transition in 5G Fronthaul Network (5G-RAB ST). Results show that the presented system can significantly reduce the waste of resources in 5G fronthaul and highly improve the quality of users' service.
Yiqian Liu, Hui Yang 0006, Ao Yu, Qiuyan Yao, Bowen Bao, Jie Zhang 0006
IWCMC1
2016 An Empirical Study on Machine Learning Models for Wind Power Predictions
abstract
Wind power prediction is of great importance in the utilization of renewable wind power. A lot of research has been done attempting to improve the accuracy of wind power predictions and has achieved desirable performance. However, there is no complete performance evaluation of machine learning methods. This paper presents an extensive empirical study of machine learning methods for wind power predictions. Nine various models are considered in this study which also includes the application and evaluation of deep learning techniques. The experimental data consists of seven datasets based on wind farms in Ontario, Canada. The results indicate that SVM, followed by ANN, has the best overall performance, and that k-NN method is suitable for longer ahead predictions. Despite the findings that deep learning fails to give improvement in basic predictions, it shows the potential for more abstract prediction tasks, such as spatial correlation predictions.
Yiqian Liu
ICMLA1