Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Denis Khryashchev

dblp:194/7581 · also Denis A. Khryashchev · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-3755-9804ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › time series analysis
time series forecasting
0.512021
Predicting Taxi and Uber Demand in Cities: Approaching the Limit of Predictability · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2021
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › ride-hailing
ride-hailing demand prediction
0.112021
Predicting Taxi and Uber Demand in Cities: Approaching the Limit of Predictability · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal-correlated entropy · 1.0markov prediction · 1.0LSTM · 1.0ARIMA · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Predicting Taxi and Uber Demand in Cities: Approaching the Limit of Predictability
abstract
Time series prediction has wide applications ranging from stock price prediction, product demand estimation to economic forecasting. In this article, we treat the taxi and Uber demand in each location as a time series, and reduce the taxi and Uber demand prediction problem to a time series prediction problem. We answer two key questions in this area. First, time series have different temporal regularity. Some are easy to be predicted and others are not. Given a predictive algorithm such as LSTM (deep learning) or ARIMA (time series), what is the maximum prediction accuracy that it can reach if it captures all the temporal patterns of that time series? Second, given the maximum predictability, which algorithm could approach the upper bound in terms of prediction accuracy? To answer these two question, we use temporal-correlated entropy to measure the time series regularity and obtain the maximum predictability. Testing with 14 million data samples, we find that the deep learning algorithm is not always the best algorithm for prediction. When the time series has a high predictability a simple Markov prediction algorithm (training time 0.5s) could outperform a deep learning algorithm (training time 6 hours). The predictability can help determine which predictor to use in terms of the accuracy and computational costs. We also find that the Uber demand is easier to be predicted compared the taxi demand due to different cruising strategies as the former is demand driven with higher temporal regularity.
Kai Zhao 0011, Denis Khryashchev, Huy T. Vo
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2020 Partial Monotone Dependence
abstract
We present a new measure of dependence suitable for time series forecasting: Partial Monotone Correlation (PMC) that generalizes Monotone Correlation. Unlike the Monotone Correlation, the new measure of dependence uses piecewise strictly monotone transformations that increase the value of the correlation coefficient. We explore its properties, its relationship with Monotone and Maximal Correlation, and present an algorithm that calculates it based on the Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation method. We also demonstrate how to apply Partial Monotone Correlation for time series analysis and forecasting introducing Partial Monotone Autoregressive model (PMAR) of order 1. Its performance is then evaluated against the baseline of linear and nonlinear autoregressive models (AR, LSTAR) on 150 time series produced from 3 datasets: Yellow Taxi pickups, Citi Bike pickups, and Cellular Network hits. Overall, PMAR model outperforms the baseline with the average sMAPE of about 1.7-4% lower.
Denis Khryashchev, Huy T. Vo, Robert M. Haralick
ICPR1
2019 Tackling the Neighboring Network Hit Problem in Cellular Data
abstract
Most humans today have mobile phones. According to the GSMA, there are almost 10 billion mobile connections in the world every day. These devices automatically capture behavioral data from human society and store it in databases around the world. However, data capture has several challenges to deal with, especially if it comes from old sources. Obsolete technologies such as 2G and 3G represent two-thirds of the total devices. To the best of our knowledge, all previous work only eliminates obvious problems in the data or use well-curated data. Eliminating traces in a time series can lead to deviations and biases in further analyses, especially when we are studying small areas or groups of peoples in the city. In this work, we present two algorithms to solve the problem of the Neighboring Network Hit (NNH) and calculate the distributions of trips and traveled distances with greater precision in small areas or groups of peoples. The problem of NNH arises when a mobile device connects to cellular sites other than those defined in the network design, which complicates the analysis of space-time mobility. We use cellular device data from three cities in Chile, obtained from the mobile phone operator and duly anonymized. We compare our results with the Government's Origin and Destination Surveys and use a novel method to generate synthetic data to which errors are added in a controlled manner to evaluate the performance of our solution. We conclude that our algorithms improve results compared to naive methods, increasing the accuracy in the count of trips and, mainly, in the distance distributions.
Andrés Leiva-Araos, Héctor Allende-Cid, Denis Khryashchev, Huy T. Vo
IEEE BigData3
2016 Predicting taxi demand at high spatial resolution: Approaching the limit of predictability
abstract
In big cities, taxi service is imbalanced. In some areas, passengers wait too long for a taxi, while in others, many taxis roam without passengers. Knowledge of where a taxi will become available can help us solve the taxi demand imbalance problem. In this paper, we employ a holistic approach to predict taxi demand at high spatial resolution. We showcase our techniques using two real-world data sets, yellow cabs and Uber trips in New York City, and perform an evaluation over 9,940 building blocks in Manhattan. Our approach consists of two key steps. First, we use entropy and the temporal correlation of human mobility to measure the demand uncertainty at the building block level. Second, to identify which predictive algorithm can approach the theoretical maximum predictability, we implement and compare three predictors: the Markov predictor (a probability-based predictive algorithm), the Lempel-Ziv-Welch predictor (a sequence-based predictive algorithm), and the Neural Network predictor (a predictive algorithm that uses machine learning). The results show that predictability varies by building block and, on average, the theoretical maximum predictability can be as high as 83%. The performance of the predictors also vary: the Neural Network predictor provides better accuracy for blocks with low predictability, and the Markov predictor provides better accuracy for blocks with high predictability. In blocks with high maximum predictability, the Markov predictor is able to predict the taxi demand with an 89% accuracy, 11% better than the Neural Network predictor, while requiring only 0.03% computation time. These findings indicate that the maximum predictability can be a good metric for selecting prediction algorithms.
Kai Zhao 0011, Denis Khryashchev, Juliana Freire, Cláudio T. Silva, Huy T. Vo
IEEE BigData2