Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samantha Mitchell Finnigan

dblp:194/9639 · also Sam Mitchell Finnigan · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0167-080XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
4 papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 35% Collaborative and social computing · 25% Design research and methods · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods › design probe
technology probe
1.012026
Designing to Support Local Stakeholders in Negotiating about Future Sustainable and Healthy Food Systems · CHI 2026
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
human-building interaction
0.412020
"No powers, man!": A Student Perspective on Designing University Smart Building Interactions · CHI 2020
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
smart buildings
0.412020
"No powers, man!": A Student Perspective on Designing University Smart Building Interactions · CHI 2020
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › human-building interaction
thermal comfort
0.312018
ThermoKiosk: Investigating Roles for Digital Surveys of Thermal Experience in Workplace Comfort Management · CHI 2018
Health and well-being technologies › user wellbeing
workplace well-being
0.312018
ThermoKiosk: Investigating Roles for Digital Surveys of Thermal Experience in Workplace Comfort Management · CHI 2018
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
building management
0.312017
"I'd Want to Burn the Data or at Least Nobble the Numbers": Towards Data-mediated Building Management for Comfort and Energy Use · CSCW 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workshop study · 2.0technology probe · 2.0interactive simulation · 2.0qualitative study · 0.7speculative futuring · 0.4design workshop · 0.4building walks · 0.4interview study · 0.3field trial · 0.3interviews · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Designing to Support Local Stakeholders in Negotiating about Future Sustainable and Healthy Food Systems
abstract
HCI has studied food practices and speculative food futures, and drawn on tools to support, for example, decision-making and participatory futuring in relation to food. However, there is little understanding of how quantitatively-grounded tools like interactive simulation models can mediate collaborative reasoning about large-scale food futures. This paper addresses this gap by exploring how interactive models that simulate food production can mediate how stakeholders think about and collaboratively negotiate sustainable and healthy food systems. We designed and developed an interactive crop and livestock model as a technology probe to allow UK food system stakeholders to explore the impacts of changing the configuration of the food production landscape in their region. We deployed it as part of the mediation of two workshops where stakeholders deliberated about future food systems to understand participant interactions with and experiences of it. As well as the design of the technology probe, we contribute an analysis of these workshops and present a preliminary set of guidelines for designing systems to support future thinking about food systems.
Adrian K. Clear, Samantha Mitchell Finnigan, Ryan T. Sharp, Alice E. Milne, Ella Furness, Elliot Meador, Susanna Mills, Angelina Sanderson Bellamy
CHI2
2020 "No powers, man!": A Student Perspective on Designing University Smart Building Interactions
abstract
Smart buildings offer an opportunity for better performance and enhanced experience by contextualising services and interactions to the needs and practices of occupants. Yet, this vision is limited by established approaches to building management, delivered top-down through professional facilities management teams, opening up an interaction-gap between occupants and the spaces they inhabit. To address the challenge of how smart buildings might be more inclusively managed, we present the results of a qualitative study with student occupants of a smart building, with design workshops including building walks and speculative futuring. We develop new understandings of how student occupants conceptualise and evaluate spaces as they experience them, and of how building management practices might evolve with new sociotechnical systems that better leverage occupant agency. Our findings point to important directions for HCI research in this nascent area, including the need for HBI (Human-Building Interaction) design to challenge entrenched roles in building management.
Samantha Mitchell Finnigan, Adrian K. Clear
CHI1
2018 ThermoKiosk: Investigating Roles for Digital Surveys of Thermal Experience in Workplace Comfort Management
abstract
Thermal comfort in shared workplaces is often contested and impacts productivity, wellbeing, and energy use. Yet, subjective and situated comfort experiences are rarely captured and engaged with. In this paper, we explore roles for digital surveys in capturing and visualising subjective experiences of comfort in situ for comfort management. We present findings from a 3-week field trial of our prototype system called ThermoKiosk, which we deployed in an open plan, shared office with a history of thermal comfort complaints. In interviews with occupants and members of facilities management, we find that the data and interactions can play an important role in initiating dialogue to understand and handle tensions, and point to design considerations for more systematically integrating them into workplace comfort practices.
Adrian K. Clear, Samantha Mitchell Finnigan, Patrick Olivier, Rob Comber
CHI2
2017 "I'd Want to Burn the Data or at Least Nobble the Numbers": Towards Data-mediated Building Management for Comfort and Energy Use
abstract
In this paper, we explore the role of pervasive environmental sensor data in workplace building management. Current interactions between management and workplace occupants are limited by the gap between experiences of (dis)comfort (i.e. individual preferences and perceptions) and the rigid objectivity of organisational policies and procedures such as static setpoint temperatures for indoor spaces. Our hypothesis is that pervasive sensor data that captures the indoor climate can provide an effective platform from which to more successfully communicate about comfort and energy use. Through a qualitative study with building managers and occupants, we show that while data does not necessarily resolve these tensions, it provides an engaging forum for a more inclusive building management process, and we outline directions for taking a more conversational approach in the design of comfort and energy-use interventions for the workplace.
Adrian K. Clear, Samantha Mitchell Finnigan, Patrick Olivier, Rob Comber
CSCW2