Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero

dblp:195/0861 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0491-3515ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 7 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 83% Graph learning · 17%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › counterfactual explanation
graph counterfactual explanation
1.422024
Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations · AAAI 2024
Developing and Evaluating Graph Counterfactual Explanation with GRETEL · WSDM 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.422024
Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations · AAAI 2024
Developing and Evaluating Graph Counterfactual Explanation with GRETEL · WSDM 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation
0.812024
Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation
0.812024
Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations · AAAI 2024
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.212023
Developing and Evaluating Graph Counterfactual Explanation with GRETEL · WSDM 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph neural network · 1.3counterfactual explanation · 1.3stochastic graph generator · 0.8latent space · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations
abstract
Counterfactual Explanation (CE) techniques have garnered attention as a means to provide insights to the users engaging with AI systems. While extensively researched in domains such as medical imaging and autonomous vehicles, Graph Counterfactual Explanation (GCE) methods have been comparatively under-explored. GCEs generate a new graph similar to the original one, with a different outcome grounded on the underlying predictive model. Among these GCE techniques, those rooted in generative mechanisms have received relatively limited investigation despite demonstrating impressive accomplishments in other domains, such as artistic styles and natural language modelling. The preference for generative explainers stems from their capacity to generate counterfactual instances during inference, leveraging autonomously acquired perturbations of the input graph. Motivated by the rationales above, our study introduces RSGG-CE, a novel Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations able to produce counterfactual examples from the learned latent space considering a partially ordered generation sequence. Furthermore, we undertake quantitative and qualitative analyses to compare RSGG-CE's performance against SoA generative explainers, highlighting its increased ability to engendering plausible counterfactual candidates.
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Bardh Prenkaj, Giovanni Stilo
AAAI1
2023 Developing and Evaluating Graph Counterfactual Explanation with GRETEL
abstract
The black-box nature and the lack of interpretability detract from constant improvements in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) performance in social network tasks like friendship prediction and community detection. Graph Counterfactual Explanation (GCE) methods aid in understanding the prediction of GNNs by generating counterfactual examples that promote trustworthiness, debiasing, and privacy in social networks. Alas, the literature on GCE lacks standardised definitions, explainers, datasets, and evaluation metrics. To bridge the gap between the performance and interpretability of GNNs in social networks, we discuss GRETEL, a unified framework for GCE methods development and evaluation. We demonstrate how GRETEL comes with fully extensible built-in components that allow users to define ad-hoc explainer methods, generate synthetic datasets, implement custom evaluation metrics, and integrate state-of-the-art prediction models.
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Bardh Prenkaj, Giovanni Stilo
WSDM1
2022 GRETEL: Graph Counterfactual Explanation Evaluation Framework
abstract
Machine Learning (ML) systems are a building part of the modern tools which impact our daily life in several application domains. Due to their black-box nature, those systems are hardly adopted in application domains (e.g. health, finance) where understanding the decision process is of paramount importance. Explanation methods were developed to explain how the ML model has taken a specific decision for a given case/instance. Graph Counterfactual Explanations (GCE) is one of the explanation techniques adopted in the Graph Learning domain. The existing works on Graph Counterfactual Explanations diverge mostly in the problem definition, application domain, test data, and evaluation metrics, and most existing works do not compare exhaustively against other counterfactual explanation techniques present in the literature. We present GRETEL, a unified framework to develop and test GCE methods in several settings. GRETEL is a highly extensible evaluation framework which promotes Open Science and the reproducibility of the evaluation by providing a set of well-defined mechanisms to integrate and manage easily: both real and synthetic datasets, ML models, state-of-the-art explanation techniques, and evaluation measures. Lastly, we also show the experiments conducted to integrate and test several existing scenarios (datasets, measures, explainers).
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Giovanni Stilo
CIKM1
2019 TSTM: A Model to Predict Topics' Popularity in News Providers
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Alessandro Celi, Giovanni Stilo, Alex Coto-Santiesteban
CIARP1
2017 Discovering Bitcoin Mixing Using Anomaly Detection
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Christian Doerr, Andrés Gago Alonso
CIARP1
2016 Community Feature Selection for Anomaly Detection in Attributed Graphs
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Andrés Gago Alonso
CIARP1
2016 Detecting contextual collective anomalies at a Glance
abstract
Many phenomena in our world can be modeled as networks, from neurons in the human brain, computer networks and bank transactions to social interactions. Anomaly detection is an important data mining task consisting in detecting rare objects that deviate from the majority of the data. Contextual collective anomaly detection techniques can be applied to intrusion detection in computer networks, bank fraud detection, or finding people with strange behavior in social networks. In this work, a fast and intuitive algorithm to detect collective contextual anomalies is presented. Furthermore, the importance of selecting algorithms which find meaningful outliers for the application domain specialists is analyzed.
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Andrés Gago Alonso
ICPR1