Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero
dblp:195/0861
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0491-3515ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 7 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 83% Graph learning · 17% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › counterfactual explanation
graph counterfactual explanation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations · AAAI 2024 Developing and Evaluating Graph Counterfactual Explanation with GRETEL · WSDM 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations · AAAI 2024 Developing and Evaluating Graph Counterfactual Explanation with GRETEL · WSDM 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations · AAAI 2024 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Developing and Evaluating Graph Counterfactual Explanation with GRETEL · WSDM 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph neural network · 1.3counterfactual explanation · 1.3stochastic graph generator · 0.8latent space · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual ExplanationsabstractCounterfactual Explanation (CE) techniques have garnered attention as a means to provide insights to the users engaging with AI systems. While extensively researched in domains such as medical imaging and autonomous vehicles, Graph Counterfactual Explanation (GCE) methods have been comparatively under-explored. GCEs generate a new graph similar to the original one, with a different outcome grounded on the underlying predictive model. Among these GCE techniques, those rooted in generative mechanisms have received relatively limited investigation despite demonstrating impressive accomplishments in other domains, such as artistic styles and natural language modelling. The preference for generative explainers stems from their capacity to generate counterfactual instances during inference, leveraging autonomously acquired perturbations of the input graph. Motivated by the rationales above, our study introduces RSGG-CE, a novel Robust Stochastic Graph Generator for Counterfactual Explanations able to produce counterfactual examples from the learned latent space considering a partially ordered generation sequence. Furthermore, we undertake quantitative and qualitative analyses to compare RSGG-CE's performance against SoA generative explainers, highlighting its increased ability to engendering plausible counterfactual candidates. Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Bardh Prenkaj, Giovanni Stilo |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Developing and Evaluating Graph Counterfactual Explanation with GRETELabstractThe black-box nature and the lack of interpretability detract from constant improvements in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) performance in social network tasks like friendship prediction and community detection. Graph Counterfactual Explanation (GCE) methods aid in understanding the prediction of GNNs by generating counterfactual examples that promote trustworthiness, debiasing, and privacy in social networks. Alas, the literature on GCE lacks standardised definitions, explainers, datasets, and evaluation metrics. To bridge the gap between the performance and interpretability of GNNs in social networks, we discuss GRETEL, a unified framework for GCE methods development and evaluation. We demonstrate how GRETEL comes with fully extensible built-in components that allow users to define ad-hoc explainer methods, generate synthetic datasets, implement custom evaluation metrics, and integrate state-of-the-art prediction models. Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Bardh Prenkaj, Giovanni Stilo |
WSDM | 1 |
| 2022 | GRETEL: Graph Counterfactual Explanation Evaluation FrameworkabstractMachine Learning (ML) systems are a building part of the modern tools which impact our daily life in several application domains. Due to their black-box nature, those systems are hardly adopted in application domains (e.g. health, finance) where understanding the decision process is of paramount importance. Explanation methods were developed to explain how the ML model has taken a specific decision for a given case/instance. Graph Counterfactual Explanations (GCE) is one of the explanation techniques adopted in the Graph Learning domain. The existing works on Graph Counterfactual Explanations diverge mostly in the problem definition, application domain, test data, and evaluation metrics, and most existing works do not compare exhaustively against other counterfactual explanation techniques present in the literature. We present GRETEL, a unified framework to develop and test GCE methods in several settings. GRETEL is a highly extensible evaluation framework which promotes Open Science and the reproducibility of the evaluation by providing a set of well-defined mechanisms to integrate and manage easily: both real and synthetic datasets, ML models, state-of-the-art explanation techniques, and evaluation measures. Lastly, we also show the experiments conducted to integrate and test several existing scenarios (datasets, measures, explainers). Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Giovanni Stilo |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2019 | TSTM: A Model to Predict Topics' Popularity in News Providers
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Alessandro Celi, Giovanni Stilo, Alex Coto-Santiesteban |
CIARP | 1 |
| 2017 | Discovering Bitcoin Mixing Using Anomaly Detection
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Christian Doerr, Andrés Gago Alonso |
CIARP | 1 |
| 2016 | Community Feature Selection for Anomaly Detection in Attributed Graphs
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Andrés Gago Alonso |
CIARP | 1 |
| 2016 | Detecting contextual collective anomalies at a GlanceabstractMany phenomena in our world can be modeled as networks, from neurons in the human brain, computer networks and bank transactions to social interactions. Anomaly detection is an important data mining task consisting in detecting rare objects that deviate from the majority of the data. Contextual collective anomaly detection techniques can be applied to intrusion detection in computer networks, bank fraud detection, or finding people with strange behavior in social networks. In this work, a fast and intuitive algorithm to detect collective contextual anomalies is presented. Furthermore, the importance of selecting algorithms which find meaningful outliers for the application domain specialists is analyzed. Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Andrés Gago Alonso |
ICPR | 1 |