Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Katharina Brockmann

dblp:195/6876 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 77% Human-robot interaction · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research
user experience research
0.312017
Not Your Cup of Tea?: How Interacting With a Robot Can Increase Perceived Self-efficacy in HRI and Evaluation · HRI 2017
Human-robot interaction › adaptive robot behavior
robot personalization
0.112017
Not Your Cup of Tea?: How Interacting With a Robot Can Increase Perceived Self-efficacy in HRI and Evaluation · HRI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

experimental study · 0.3Self-Efficacy in HRI Scale · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Not Your Cup of Tea?: How Interacting With a Robot Can Increase Perceived Self-efficacy in HRI and Evaluation
abstract
The goal of this work is to explore the influence of do-it-yourself customization of a robot on technologically experienced students and unexperienced elderly users' perceived self-efficacy in HRI, uncertainty, and evaluation of the robot and interaction. We introduce the Self-Efficacy in HRI Scale and present two experimental studies. In study 1 (students, n=60) we found that any interaction with the robot increased self-efficacy, regardless of whether this interaction involves customization or not. Moreover, individual increases in self-efficacy predict more positive evaluations. In a second study with elderly users (n=60) we could not replicate the general positive effect of the interaction on self-efficacy. Again, we did not find the hypothesized stronger effect of customization on self-efficacy, nor did we find that relationship between self-efficacy increase and evaluation. We discuss limitations of the setting and for questionnaire design for elderly participants.
Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nikolai Bock, Katharina Brockmann
HRI3