Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick Struck

dblp:196/0679 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
18ranked-venue papers
0as first author
13since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7738-2017ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 18 · 13 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
5 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 92% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 5% Hardware security and side channels · 3%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography
1.322025
Exclusive Ownership of Fiat-Shamir Signatures: ML-DSA, SQIsign, LESS, and More · CRYPTO (6) 2025
Deterministic Wallets in a Quantum World · CCS 2020
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures
1.022025
Exclusive Ownership of Fiat-Shamir Signatures: ML-DSA, SQIsign, LESS, and More · CRYPTO (6) 2025
Deterministic Wallets in a Quantum World · CCS 2020
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
dilithium
0.912025
Exclusive Ownership of Fiat-Shamir Signatures: ML-DSA, SQIsign, LESS, and More · CRYPTO (6) 2025
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
fiat-shamir signatures
0.912025
Exclusive Ownership of Fiat-Shamir Signatures: ML-DSA, SQIsign, LESS, and More · CRYPTO (6) 2025
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
block cipher
0.812024
Post-quantum Security of Tweakable Even-Mansour, and Applications · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
hash functions
0.812024
On the (In)Security of the BUFF Transform · CRYPTO (1) 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum security
0.812024
Post-quantum Security of Tweakable Even-Mansour, and Applications · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher › key-alternating ciphers
tweakable even-mansour
0.812024
Post-quantum Security of Tweakable Even-Mansour, and Applications · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum cryptanalysis
0.812024
Post-quantum Security of Tweakable Even-Mansour, and Applications · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › cryptocurrency wallet
wallet security
0.412020
Deterministic Wallets in a Quantum World · CCS 2020
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
authenticated encryption
0.412019
Sponges Resist Leakage: The Case of Authenticated Encryption · ASIACRYPT (2) 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
leakage-resilient cryptography
0.412019
Sponges Resist Leakage: The Case of Authenticated Encryption · ASIACRYPT (2) 2019
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
leakage attacks
0.112019
Sponges Resist Leakage: The Case of Authenticated Encryption · ASIACRYPT (2) 2019
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
0.112019
Sponges Resist Leakage: The Case of Authenticated Encryption · ASIACRYPT (2) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantum adversary model · 1.5fiat-shamir transform · 0.9quantum security analysis · 0.4sponge construction · 0.4leakage models · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Generic Committing Attacks - Zero-Padded Ascon is Less Secure than Expected
Nilanjan Datta, Hrithik Nandi, Soumit Pal, Yu Sasaki 0001, Patrick Struck, Maximiliane Weishäupl
CRYPTO (6)5
2025 Exclusive Ownership of Fiat-Shamir Signatures: ML-DSA, SQIsign, LESS, and More
Michael Meyer 0001, Patrick Struck, Maximiliane Weishäupl
CRYPTO (6)2
2025 Lattice-Based Sanitizable Signature Schemes: Chameleon Hash Functions and More
Sebastian Clermont, Samed Düzlü, Christian Janson, Laurens Porzenheim, Patrick Struck
PQCrypto (1)5
2025 How (not) to Build Identity-Based Encryption from Isogenies
Elif Ozbay Gurler, Patrick Struck
SAC2
2024 Efficient Post-Quantum Secure Deterministic Threshold Wallets from Isogenies
abstract
Cryptocurrency networks crucially rely on digital signature schemes, which are used as an authentication mechanism for transactions. Unfortunately, most major cryptocurrencies today, including Bit-coin and Ethereum, employ signature schemes that are susceptible to quantum adversaries, i.e., an adversary with access to a quantum computer can forge signatures and thereby spend coins of honest users. In cryptocurrency networks, signature schemes are typically not executed in isolation, but within a so-called cryptographic wallet. In order to achieve security against quantum adversaries, the signature scheme and the cryptographic wallet must withstand quantum attacks.
Poulami Das 0003, Andreas Erwig, Michael Meyer 0001, Patrick Struck
AsiaCCS4
2024 On the (In)Security of the BUFF Transform
Jelle Don, Serge Fehr, Yu-Hsuan Huang 0003, Patrick Struck
CRYPTO (1)4
2024 Post-quantum Security of Tweakable Even-Mansour, and Applications
Gorjan Alagic, Jonathan Katz, Christian Majenz, Patrick Struck
EUROCRYPT (1)5
2024 The Role of Message-Bound Signatures for the Beyond UnForgeability Features and Weak Keys
Samed Düzlü, Patrick Struck
ISC (2)2
2024 Hash Your Keys Before Signing - BUFF Security of the Additional NIST PQC Signatures
Thomas Aulbach, Samed Düzlü, Michael Meyer 0001, Patrick Struck, Maximiliane Weishäupl
PQCrypto (2)4
2024 Hide-and-Seek and the Non-resignability of the BUFF Transform
Jelle Don, Serge Fehr, Yu-Hsuan Huang 0003, Jyun-Jie Liao, Patrick Struck
TCC (3)5
2022 Sponge-Based Authenticated Encryption: Security Against Quantum Attackers
Christian Janson, Patrick Struck
PQCrypto2
2022 On Quantum Ciphertext Indistinguishability, Recoverability, and OAEP
Juliane Krämer, Patrick Struck
PQCrypto2
2021 Quantum Indistinguishability for Public Key Encryption
Tommaso Gagliardoni, Juliane Krämer, Patrick Struck
PQCrypto3
2020 Secure Two-Party Computation in a Quantum World
Niklas Büscher, Daniel Demmler, Nikolaos P. Karvelas, Stefan Katzenbeisser 0001, Juliane Krämer, Deevashwer Rathee, Thomas Schneider 0003, Patrick Struck
ACNS (1)8
2020 Deterministic Wallets in a Quantum World
abstract
Most blockchain solutions are susceptible to quantum attackers as they rely on cryptography that is known to be insecure in the presence of quantum adversaries. In this work we advance the study of quantum-resistant blockchain solutions by giving a quantum-resistant construction of a deterministic wallet scheme. Deterministic wallets are frequently used in practice in order to secure funds by storing the sensitive secret key on a so-called cold wallet that is not connected to the Internet. Recently, Das et al. (CCS'19) developed a formal model for the security analysis of deterministic wallets and proposed a generic construction from certain types of signature schemes that exhibit key rerandomization properties. We revisit the proposed classical construction in the presence of quantum adversaries and obtain the following results.
Nabil Alkeilani Alkadri, Poulami Das 0003, Andreas Erwig, Sebastian Faust, Juliane Krämer, Siavash Riahi 0002, Patrick Struck
CCS7
2020 Encryption Schemes Using Random Oracles: From Classical to Post-Quantum Security
Juliane Krämer, Patrick Struck
PQCrypto2
2019 Sponges Resist Leakage: The Case of Authenticated Encryption
Jean Paul Degabriele, Christian Janson, Patrick Struck
ASIACRYPT (2)3
2017 A Linearly Homomorphic Signature Scheme from Weaker Assumptions
Lucas Schabhüser, Johannes Buchmann 0001, Patrick Struck
IMACC3