Krutika Gohil

Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

? Tutorial for this page

Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

dblp:198/0276 · DBLP profile ↗

← Back

1ranked-venue papers

0as first author

1since 2021 · last 2022

—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing

1 paper

Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

Topic	Weight	Papers	Last	Evidence papers
Human-AI interaction trust in AI	0.6	1	2022	Can we trust a chatbot like a physician? A qualitative study on understanding the emergence of trust toward diagnostic chatbots · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2022
Human-AI interaction › conversational agents health chatbot	0.2	1	2022	Can we trust a chatbot like a physician? A qualitative study on understanding the emergence of trust toward diagnostic chatbots · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative study · 0.6

Year	Publication	Venue	Position
2022	Can we trust a chatbot like a physician? A qualitative study on understanding the emergence of trust toward diagnostic chatbots Lennart Seitz, Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, Krutika Gohil	Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.	3