Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sofie Andersson

dblp:198/1234 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning
0.312018
Human-in-the-Loop Mixed-Initiative Control Under Temporal Tasks · ICRA 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › task planning
temporal logic task planning
0.312018
Human-in-the-Loop Mixed-Initiative Control Under Temporal Tasks · ICRA 2018
Human-robot interaction
human-in-the-loop control
0.112018
Human-in-the-Loop Mixed-Initiative Control Under Temporal Tasks · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear temporal logic · 0.7inverse reinforcement learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Human-in-the-Loop Mixed-Initiative Control Under Temporal Tasks
abstract
This paper considers the motion control and task planning problem of mobile robots under complex high-level tasks and human initiatives. The assigned task is specified as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) formulas that consist of hard and soft constraints. The human initiative influences the robot autonomy in two explicit ways: with additive terms in the continuous controller and with contingent task assignments. We propose an online coordination scheme that encapsulates (i) a mixed-initiative continuous controller that ensures all-time safety despite of possible human errors, (ii) a plan adaptation scheme that accommodates new features discovered in the workspace and short-term tasks assigned by the operator during run time, and (iii) an iterative inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) algorithm that allows the robot to asymptotically learn the human preference on the parameters during the plan synthesis. The results are demonstrated by both realistic human-in-the-loop simulations and experiments.
Meng Guo 0002, Sofie Andersson, Dimos V. Dimarogonas
ICRA2