Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizabeth J. Brown

dblp:20/2195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 70% Learning and educational technologies · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research › individual differences
cognitive style
0.112006
Reappraising cognitive styles in adaptive web applications · WWW 2006
Usability and user experience research
user modeling
0.112006
Reappraising cognitive styles in adaptive web applications · WWW 2006
Usability and user experience research
user study
0.012006
Reappraising cognitive styles in adaptive web applications · WWW 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

felder-solomon inventory of learning styles · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Adapting for Visual and Verbal Learning Styles in AEH
abstract
This paper describes how visual and verbal learning styles have been successfully integrated into an adaptive educational environment. User trials of this system were carried out, to determine the effect of the adaptation, and although these user trials do not indicate any statistically significant differences, the qualitative information gleaned from the study indicated that students preferred using this environment over other traditional revision methods, and that they perceived personalized tuition to be better than a 'one size fits all' approach
Elizabeth J. Brown, Craig D. Stewart, Tim J. Brailsford
ICALT1
2006 Reappraising cognitive styles in adaptive web applications
abstract
The mechanisms for personalisation used in web applications are currently the subject of much debate amongst researchers from many diverse subject areas. One of the most contemporary ideas for user modelling in web applications is that of cognitive styles, where a user's psychological preferences are assessed stored in a database and then used to provide personalised content and/or links. We describe user trials of a case study that utilises visual-verbal preferences in an adaptive web-based educational system (AWBES). Students in this trial were assessed by the Felder-Solomon Inventory of Learning Styles (ILS) instrument, and their preferences were used as a means of content personalisation.Contrary to previous findings by other researchers, we found no significant differences in performance between matched and mismatched students. Conclusions are drawn about the value and validity of using cognitive styles as a way of modelling user preferences in educational web applications.
Elizabeth J. Brown, Tim J. Brailsford, Tony Fisher, Adam Moore, Helen Ashman
WWW1