Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Trond Hellem Bø

dblp:20/4433 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › physical mapping
radiation hybrid mapping
0.012002
A fast top-down method for constructing reliable radiation hybrid frameworks · Bioinform. 2002
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.012002
A fast top-down method for constructing reliable radiation hybrid frameworks · Bioinform. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

top-down algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Tumor classification and marker gene prediction by feature selection and fuzzy c-means clustering using microarray data
abstract
BACKGROUND: Using DNA microarrays, we have developed two novel models for tumor classification and target gene prediction. First, gene expression profiles are summarized by optimally selected Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs), followed by tumor sample classification by Fuzzy C-means clustering. Then, the prediction of marker genes is accomplished by either manual feature selection (visualizing the weighted/mean SOM component plane) or automatic feature selection (by pair-wise Fisher's linear discriminant). RESULTS: The proposed models were tested on four published datasets: (1) Leukemia (2) Colon cancer (3) Brain tumors and (4) NCI cancer cell lines. The models gave class prediction with markedly reduced error rates compared to other class prediction approaches, and the importance of feature selection on microarray data analysis was also emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: Our models identify marker genes with predictive potential, often better than other available methods in the literature. The models are potentially useful for medical diagnostics and may reveal some insights into cancer classification. Additionally, we illustrated two limitations in tumor classification from microarray data related to the biology underlying the data, in terms of (1) the class size of data, and (2) the internal structure of classes. These limitations are not specific for the classification models used.
Junbai Wang, Trond Hellem Bø, Inge Jonassen, Ola Myklebost, Eivind Hovig
BMC Bioinform.2
2002 A fast top-down method for constructing reliable radiation hybrid frameworks
abstract
MOTIVATION: Radiation Hybrid Mapping (RHM) is a technique used to order a set of markers on a genome and estimating physical distances between them. RHM provides information on marker placement independent from other methods such as sequencing, and can therefore be used for example in genome sequencing to help ordering contigs. A radiation hybrid framework can be constructed by choosing a set of markers so that the chromosome coverage is good and so that the markers can be ordered with high confidence. Automatically constructing RHM frameworks is a computationally challenging problem. RESULTS: We have developed a new method for constructing radiation hybrid frameworks. Given a relatively large set of markers for a chromosome, the algorithm aims to select an ordered subset that makes up a framework, and that contains as many markers as possible. The algorithm has a time complexity that is better than any of the existing methods that we are aware of. Furthermore, we propose a method for comparing if two frameworks are consistent, giving a visual presentation as well as quantitative measures of how well the two frameworks agree. Applying our method on marker sets from 22 human chromosomes and comparing the resulting frameworks with previously published frameworks, we demonstrate that our automatic method efficiently constructs frameworks with good coverage of each chromosome and with high degree of agreement on the marker ordering.
Trond Hellem Bø, Inge Jonassen, Ingvar Eidhammer, Carsten Helgesen
Bioinform.1