Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ulf Asklund

dblp:20/5133 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 56% Empirical software engineering · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
collaborative software development
0.011993
Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software Development · SIGSOFT FSE 1993
Software maintenance and evolution › software configuration management
version control
0.011993
Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software Development · SIGSOFT FSE 1993
Software maintenance and evolution › change impact analysis
change propagation
0.011993
Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software Development · SIGSOFT FSE 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

merge · 0.0hierarchical revision control · 0.0diffing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Quality Improvements by Integrating Development Processes
abstract
Software is an increasing and important part of many products and systems. Software, hardware, and system level components have been developed and produced following separate processes. However, in order to improve the quality of the final complex product, requirements and prospects for an automatic integrated process support are called for. Product data management (PDM) has focused on hardware products, while software configuration management (SCM) has aimed to support software development. Several attempts to integrate tools from these domains exist, but they all show small visible success. The reason for this is that integration goes far beyond tool issues only. According to our experiences, three main factors play a crucial role for a successful integration: tools and technologies, processes, and people. This paper analyses the main characteristics of PDM and SCM, describes the three integration factors, identifies a model for the integration process, and pin-points the main challenges to achieve a successful integration of hardware and software development. The complexity of the problems is shown through several case studies.
Annita Persson Dahlqvist, Ivica Crnkovic, Ulf Asklund
APSEC3
1993 Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software Development
abstract
This paper presents a framework for controlling the evolution of complex software systems concurrently developed by teams of software engineers. A general technique for fine-grained revision control of hierarchically structured information, such as programs and documents, is described and evaluated. All levels in the hierarchy are revision controlled, leaves as well as branch nodes. The technique supports sharing of unchanged nodes among revisions, automatic change propagation, and change-oriented representation of differences. Its use in a software development environment is presented, facilitating optimistic check-out of revisions and alternatives, check-in with incremental merge support, visualization of change propagation, and an integrated flexible diff-ing technique providing group awareness for team members.
Boris Magnusson, Ulf Asklund, Sten Minör
SIGSOFT FSE2