Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ulf Asklund
dblp:20/5133
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 56% Empirical software engineering · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
collaborative software development |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software Development · SIGSOFT FSE 1993 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software configuration management
version control |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software Development · SIGSOFT FSE 1993 |
Software maintenance and evolution › change impact analysis
change propagation |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software Development · SIGSOFT FSE 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
merge · 0.0hierarchical revision control · 0.0diffing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Quality Improvements by Integrating Development ProcessesabstractSoftware is an increasing and important part of many products and systems. Software, hardware, and system level components have been developed and produced following separate processes. However, in order to improve the quality of the final complex product, requirements and prospects for an automatic integrated process support are called for. Product data management (PDM) has focused on hardware products, while software configuration management (SCM) has aimed to support software development. Several attempts to integrate tools from these domains exist, but they all show small visible success. The reason for this is that integration goes far beyond tool issues only. According to our experiences, three main factors play a crucial role for a successful integration: tools and technologies, processes, and people. This paper analyses the main characteristics of PDM and SCM, describes the three integration factors, identifies a model for the integration process, and pin-points the main challenges to achieve a successful integration of hardware and software development. The complexity of the problems is shown through several case studies. Annita Persson Dahlqvist, Ivica Crnkovic, Ulf Asklund |
APSEC | 3 |
| 1993 | Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software DevelopmentabstractThis paper presents a framework for controlling the evolution of complex software systems concurrently developed by teams of software engineers. A general technique for fine-grained revision control of hierarchically structured information, such as programs and documents, is described and evaluated. All levels in the hierarchy are revision controlled, leaves as well as branch nodes. The technique supports sharing of unchanged nodes among revisions, automatic change propagation, and change-oriented representation of differences. Its use in a software development environment is presented, facilitating optimistic check-out of revisions and alternatives, check-in with incremental merge support, visualization of change propagation, and an integrated flexible diff-ing technique providing group awareness for team members. Boris Magnusson, Ulf Asklund, Sten Minör |
SIGSOFT FSE | 2 |