Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vincent J. Magrini
dblp:20/8713
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-2019-4872ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | SLOPE: a quick and accurate method for locating non-SNP structural variation from targeted next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
targeted sequencing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | SLOPE: a quick and accurate method for locating non-SNP structural variation from targeted next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › chromosomal aberration detection
translocation detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | SLOPE: a quick and accurate method for locating non-SNP structural variation from targeted next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
de novo assembly |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Extending assembly of short DNA sequences to handle error · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Extending assembly of short DNA sequences to handle error · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
short-read analysis · 0.1high-depth coverage · 0.1consensus assembly · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Genome Modeling System: A Knowledge Management Platform for GenomicsabstractIn this work, we present the Genome Modeling System (GMS), an analysis information management system capable of executing automated genome analysis pipelines at a massive scale. The GMS framework provides detailed tracking of samples and data coupled with reliable and repeatable analysis pipelines. The GMS also serves as a platform for bioinformatics development, allowing a large team to collaborate on data analysis, or an individual researcher to leverage the work of others effectively within its data management system. Rather than separating ad-hoc analysis from rigorous, reproducible pipelines, the GMS promotes systematic integration between the two. As a demonstration of the GMS, we performed an integrated analysis of whole genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing data from a breast cancer cell line (HCC1395) and matched lymphoblastoid line (HCC1395BL). These data are available for users to test the software, complete tutorials and develop novel GMS pipeline configurations. The GMS is available at https://github.com/genome/gms. Malachi Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Scott M. Smith, Avinash Ramu, Matthew B. Callaway, Anthony M. Brummett, Michael J. Kiwala, Adam C. Coffman, Allison A. Regier, Benjamin J. Oberkfell, Gabriel E. Sanderson, Thomas P. Mooney, Nathaniel G. Nutter, Edward A. Belter, Feiyu Du, Robert L. Long, Travis E. Abbott, Ian T. Ferguson, David L. Morton, Mark M. Burnett, James V. Weible, Joshua B. Peck, Adam Dukes, Joshua F. McMichael, Justin T. Lolofie, Brian R. Derickson, Jasreet Hundal, Zachary L. Skidmore, Benjamin J. Ainscough, Nathan D. Dees, William S. Schierding, Cyriac Kandoth, Kyung H. Kim, Charles Lu 0002, Christopher C. Harris, Nicole Maher, Christopher A. Maher, Vincent J. Magrini, Benjamin S. Abbott, Ken Chen 0001, Eric Clark, Indraniel Das, Xian Fan, Amy E. Hawkins, Todd G. Hepler, Todd Wylie, Shawn M. Leonard, William E. Schroeder, Xiaoqi Shi, Lynn K. Carmichael, Matthew R. Weil, Richard W. Wohlstadter, Gary Stiehr, Michael D. McLellan, Craig S. Pohl, Christopher A. Miller 0002, Daniel C. Koboldt, Jason R. Walker, James M. Eldred, David E. Larson, David J. Dooling, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 38 |
| 2010 | SLOPE: a quick and accurate method for locating non-SNP structural variation from targeted next-generation sequence dataabstractMOTIVATION: Targeted 'deep' sequencing of specific genes or regions is of great interest in clinical cancer diagnostics where some sequence variants, particularly translocations and indels, have known prognostic or diagnostic significance. In this setting, it is unnecessary to sequence an entire genome, and target capture methods can be applied to limit sequencing to important regions, thereby reducing costs and the time required to complete testing. Existing 'next-gen' sequencing analysis packages are optimized for efficiency in whole-genome studies and are unable to benefit from the particular structure of targeted sequence data. RESULTS: We developed SLOPE to detect structural variants from targeted short-DNA reads. We use both real and simulated data to demonstrate SLOPE's ability to rapidly detect insertion/deletion events of various sizes as well as translocations and viral integration sites with high sensitivity and low false discovery rate. AVAILABILITY: Binary code available at http://www-genepi.med.utah.edu/suppl/SLOPE/index.html Haley J. Abel, Eric J. Duncavage, Nils Becker, Jon R. Armstrong, Vincent J. Magrini, John D. Pfeifer |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2007 | Extending assembly of short DNA sequences to handle errorabstractUNLABELLED: Inexpensive de novo genome sequencing, particularly in organisms with small genomes, is now possible using several new sequencing technologies. Some of these technologies such as that from Illumina's Solexa Sequencing, produce high genomic coverage by generating a very large number of small reads ( approximately 30 bp). While prior work shows that partial assembly can be performed by k-mer extension in error-free reads, this algorithm is unsuccessful with the sequencing error rates found in practice. We present VCAKE (Verified Consensus Assembly by K-mer Extension), a modification of simple k-mer extension that overcomes error by using high depth coverage. Though it is a simple modification of a previous approach, we show significant improvements in assembly results on simulated and experimental datasets that include error. AVAILABILITY: http://152.2.15.114/~labweb/VCAKE William R. Jeck, Josephine A. Reinhardt, David A. Baltrus, Matthew T. Hickenbotham, Vincent J. Magrini, Elaine R. Mardis, Jeffery L. Dangl, Corbin D. Jones |
Bioinform. | 5 |