Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tete Xiao
dblp:200/8130
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0006-6440-2393ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 10 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
14 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 31% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% Video understanding and tracking · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
1.5 | 4 | 2021 | Region Similarity Representation Learning · ICCV 2021 Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detection · ECCV (14) 2018 Repulsion Loss: Detecting Pedestrians in a Crowd · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Something-Else: Compositional Action Recognition With Spatial-Temporal Interaction Networks · CVPR 2020 Reasoning About Human-Object Interactions Through Dual Attention Networks · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Segment Anything · ICCV 2023 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Segment Anything · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
pedestrian detection |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Repulsion Loss: Detecting Pedestrians in a Crowd · CVPR 2018 What Can Help Pedestrian Detection? · CVPR 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image retrieval
fine-grained image retrieval |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rethinking preventing class-collapsing in metric learning with margin-based losses · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image retrieval |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rethinking preventing class-collapsing in metric learning with margin-based losses · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rethinking preventing class-collapsing in metric learning with margin-based losses · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › detector training
object detection pretraining |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Region Similarity Representation Learning · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › visual representation learning
region representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Region Similarity Representation Learning · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation invariance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Better · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
compositional action recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Something-Else: Compositional Action Recognition With Spatial-Temporal Interaction Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
human-object interaction recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Reasoning About Human-Object Interactions Through Dual Attention Networks · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene understanding
semantic scene understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Semantic Understanding of Scenes Through the ADE20K Dataset · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | MegDet: A Large Mini-Batch Object Detector · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning › scalable training
large mini-batch training |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | MegDet: A Large Mini-Batch Object Detector · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › parallelization › parallel training
multi-GPU training |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | MegDet: A Large Mini-Batch Object Detector · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understanding · ECCV (5) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › visual representation learning
vision foundation model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Segment Anything · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
cycle consistency |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Cross-Domain Correspondence for Control with Dynamics Cycle-Consistency · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › human pose estimation › 3d pose estimation
dense pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Region Similarity Representation Learning · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Region Similarity Representation Learning · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
few-shot action recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Something-Else: Compositional Action Recognition With Spatial-Temporal Interaction Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › object segmentation
affordance segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Reasoning About Human-Object Interactions Through Dual Attention Networks · ICCV 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
promptable model · 1.3data collection loop · 1.3contrastive learning · 1.0triplet loss · 0.5sliding-window feature alignment · 0.5patchify stem · 0.5margin loss · 0.5dynamics cycle-consistency · 0.5convolutional neural network · 0.5object box annotation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Segment AnythingabstractWe introduce the Segment Anything (SA) project: a new task, model, and dataset for image segmentation. Using our efficient model in a data collection loop, we built the largest segmentation dataset to date (by far), with over 1 billion masks on 11M licensed and privacy respecting images. The model is designed and trained to be promptable, so it can transfer zero-shot to new image distributions and tasks. We evaluate its capabilities on numerous tasks and find that its zero-shot performance is impressive – often competitive with or even superior to prior fully supervised results. We are releasing the Segment Anything Model (SAM) and corresponding dataset (SA-1B) of 1B masks and 11M images at segment-anything.com to foster research into foundation models for computer vision. We recommend reading the full paper at: arxiv.org/abs/2304.02643. Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloé Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C. Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Dollár, Ross B. Girshick |
ICCV | 7 |
| 2021 | Rethinking preventing class-collapsing in metric learning with margin-based lossesabstractMetric learning seeks perceptual embeddings where visually similar instances are close and dissimilar instances are apart, but learned representations can be sub-optimal when the distribution of intra-class samples is diverse and distinct sub-clusters are present. Although theoretically with optimal assumptions, margin-based losses such as the triplet loss and margin loss have a diverse family of solutions. We theoretically prove and empirically show that under reasonable noise assumptions, margin-based losses tend to project all samples of a class with various modes onto a single point in the embedding space, resulting in class collapse that usually renders the space ill-sorted for classification or retrieval. To address this problem, we propose a simple modification to the embedding losses such that each sample selects its nearest same-class counterpart in a batch as the positive element in the tuple. This allows for the presence of multiple sub-clusters within each class. The adaptation can be integrated into a wide range of metric learning losses. Our method demonstrates clear benefits on various fine-grained image retrieval datasets over a variety of existing losses; qualitative retrieval results show that samples with similar visual patterns are indeed closer in the embedding space. Elad Levi, Tete Xiao, Xiaolong Wang 0004, Trevor Darrell |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2021 | Region Similarity Representation LearningabstractWe present Region Similarity Representation Learning (ReSim), a new approach to self-supervised representation learning for localization-based tasks such as object detection and segmentation. While existing work has largely focused on solely learning global representations for an entire image, ReSim learns both regional representations for localization as well as semantic image-level representations. ReSim operates by sliding a fixed-sized window across the overlapping area between two views (e.g., image crops), aligning these areas with their corresponding convolutional feature map regions, and then maximizing the feature similarity across views. As a result, ReSim learns spatially and semantically consistent feature representation throughout the convolutional feature maps of a neural network. A shift or scale of an image region, e.g., a shift or scale of an object, has a corresponding change in the feature maps; this allows downstream tasks to leverage these representations for localization. Through object detection, instance segmentation, and dense pose estimation experiments, we illustrate how ReSim learns representations which significantly improve the localization and classification performance compared to a competitive MoCo-v2 baseline: $ + 2.7AP_{75}^{bb}VOC$, $ + 1.1AP_{75}^{bb}COCO$, and +1.9 APmkCityscapes. Code and pre-trained models are released at: https://github.com/Tete-Xiao/ReSim Tete Xiao, Colorado Reed, Xiaolong Wang 0004, Kurt Keutzer, Trevor Darrell |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learning
Tete Xiao, Xiaolong Wang 0004, Alexei A. Efros, Trevor Darrell |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning Cross-Domain Correspondence for Control with Dynamics Cycle-Consistency
Tete Xiao, Alexei A. Efros, Lerrel Pinto, Xiaolong Wang 0004 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Early Convolutions Help Transformers See BetterabstractVision transformer (ViT) models exhibit substandard optimizability. In particular, they are sensitive to the choice of optimizer (AdamW vs. SGD), optimizer hyperparameters, and training schedule length. In comparison, modern convolutional neural networks are easier to optimize. Why is this the case? In this work, we conjecture that the issue lies with the patchify stem of ViT models, which is implemented by a stride-p p×p convolution (p = 16 by default) applied to the input image. This large-kernel plus large-stride convolution runs counter to typical design choices of convolutional layers in neural networks. To test whether this atypical design choice causes an issue, we analyze the optimization behavior of ViT models with their original patchify stem versus a simple counterpart where we replace the ViT stem by a small number of stacked stride-two 3×3 convolutions. While the vast majority of computation in the two ViT designs is identical, we find that this small change in early visual processing results in markedly different training behavior in terms of the sensitivity to optimization settings as well as the final model accuracy. Using a convolutional stem in ViT dramatically increases optimization stability and also improves peak performance (by ∼1-2% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet-1k), while maintaining flops and runtime. The improvement can be observed across the wide spectrum of model complexities (from 1G to 36G flops) and dataset scales (from ImageNet-1k to ImageNet-21k). These findings lead us to recommend using a standard, lightweight convolutional stem for ViT models in this regime as a more robust architectural choice compared to the original ViT model design. Tete Xiao, Mannat Singh, Eric Mintun, Trevor Darrell, Piotr Dollár, Ross B. Girshick |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Something-Else: Compositional Action Recognition With Spatial-Temporal Interaction NetworksabstractHuman action is naturally compositional: humans can easily recognize and perform actions with objects that are different from those used in training demonstrations. In this paper, we study the compositionality of action by looking into the dynamics of subject-object interactions. We propose a novel model which can explicitly reason about the geometric relations between constituent objects and an agent performing an action. To train our model, we collect dense object box annotations on the Something-Something dataset. We propose a novel compositional action recognition task where the training combinations of verbs and nouns do not overlap with the test set. The novel aspects of our model are applicable to activities with prominent object interaction dynamics and to objects which can be tracked using state-of-the-art approaches; for activities without clearly defined spatial object-agent interactions, we rely on baseline scene-level spatio-temporal representations. We show the effectiveness of our approach not only on the proposed compositional action recognition task but also in a few-shot compositional setting which requires the model to generalize across both object appearance and action category. Joanna Materzynska, Tete Xiao, Roei Herzig, Huijuan Xu 0001, Xiaolong Wang 0004, Trevor Darrell |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2019 | Reasoning About Human-Object Interactions Through Dual Attention NetworksabstractObjects are entities we act upon, where the functionality of an object is determined by how we interact with it. In this work we propose a Dual Attention Network model which reasons about human-object interactions. The dual-attentional framework weights the important features for objects and actions respectively. As a result, the recognition of objects and actions mutually benefit each other. The proposed model shows competitive classification performance on the human-object interaction dataset Something-Something. Besides, it can perform weak spatiotemporal localization and affordance segmentation, despite being trained only with video-level labels. The model not only finds when an action is happening and which object is being manipulated, but also identifies which part of the object is being interacted with. Tete Xiao, Quanfu Fan, Dan Gutfreund, Mathew Monfort, Aude Oliva, Bolei Zhou |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2019 | Semantic Understanding of Scenes Through the ADE20K Dataset
Bolei Zhou, Hang Zhao 0021, Xavier Puig, Tete Xiao, Sanja Fidler, Adela Barriuso, Antonio Torralba 0001 |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 4 |
| 2018 | Learning Visually-Grounded Semantics from Contrastive Adversarial SamplesabstractWe study the problem of grounding distributional representations of texts on the visual domain, namely visual-semantic embeddings (VSE for short). Begin with an insightful adversarial attack on VSE embeddings, we show the limitation of current frameworks and image-text datasets (e.g., MS-COCO) both quantitatively and qualitatively. The large gap between the number of possible constitutions of real-world semantics and the size of parallel data, to a large extent, restricts the model to establish a strong link between textual semantics and visual concepts. We alleviate this problem by augmenting the MS-COCO image captioning datasets with textual contrastive adversarial samples. These samples are synthesized using language priors of human and the WordNet knowledge base, and enforce the model to ground learned embeddings to concrete concepts within the image. This simple but powerful technique brings a noticeable improvement over the baselines on a diverse set of downstream tasks, in addition to defending known-type adversarial attacks. Codes are available at https://github.com/ExplorerFreda/VSE-C. Freda Shi, Jiayuan Mao, Tete Xiao, Yuning Jiang 0001, Jian Sun 0001 |
COLING | 3 |
| 2018 | MegDet: A Large Mini-Batch Object DetectorabstractThe development of object detection in the era of deep learning, from R-CNN [11], Fast/Faster R-CNN [10, 31] to recent Mask R-CNN [14] and RetinaNet [24], mainly come from novel network, new framework, or loss design. However, mini-batch size, a key factor for the training of deep neural networks, has not been well studied for object detection. In this paper, we propose a Large Mini-Batch Object Detector (MegDet) to enable the training with a large mini-batch size up to 256, so that we can effectively utilize at most 128 GPUs to significantly shorten the training time. Technically, we suggest a warmup learning rate policy and Cross-GPU Batch Normalization, which together allow us to successfully train a large mini-batch detector in much less time (e.g., from 33 hours to 4 hours), and achieve even better accuracy. The MegDet is the backbone of our submission (mmAP 52.5%) to COCO 2017 Challenge, where we won the 1st place of Detection task. Chao Peng 0001, Tete Xiao, Yuning Jiang 0001, Xiangyu Zhang 0005, Gang Yu 0002, Jian Sun 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2018 | Repulsion Loss: Detecting Pedestrians in a CrowdabstractDetecting individual pedestrians in a crowd remains a challenging problem since the pedestrians often gather together and occlude each other in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we first explore how a state-of-the-art pedestrian detector is harmed by crowd occlusion via experimentation, providing insights into the crowd occlusion problem. Then, we propose a novel bounding box regression loss specifically designed for crowd scenes, termed repulsion loss. This loss is driven by two motivations: the attraction by target, and the repulsion by other surrounding objects. The repulsion term prevents the proposal from shifting to surrounding objects thus leading to more crowd-robust localization. Our detector trained by repulsion loss outperforms the state-of-the-art methods with a significant improvement in occlusion cases. Tete Xiao, Yuning Jiang 0001, Shuai Shao 0005, Jian Sun 0001, Chunhua Shen |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2018 | Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detection
Borui Jiang, Ruixuan Luo, Jiayuan Mao, Tete Xiao, Yuning Jiang 0001 |
ECCV (14) | 4 |
| 2018 | Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understanding
Tete Xiao, Yingcheng Liu, Bolei Zhou, Yuning Jiang 0001, Jian Sun 0001 |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2017 | What Can Help Pedestrian Detection?abstractAggregating extra features has been considered as an effective approach to boost traditional pedestrian detection methods. However, there is still a lack of studies on whether and how CNN-based pedestrian detectors can benefit from these extra features. The first contribution of this paper is exploring this issue by aggregating extra features into CNN-based pedestrian detection framework. Through extensive experiments, we evaluate the effects of different kinds of extra features quantitatively. Moreover, we propose a novel network architecture, namely HyperLearner, to jointly learn pedestrian detection as well as the given extra feature. By multi-task training, HyperLearner is able to utilize the information of given features and improve detection performance without extra inputs in inference. The experimental results on multiple pedestrian benchmarks validate the effectiveness of the proposed HyperLearner. Jiayuan Mao, Tete Xiao, Yuning Jiang 0001, Zhimin Cao |
CVPR | 2 |