Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sreya Banerjee

dblp:200/8593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-2658-9020ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 62% Image and video coding · 19% Visualization and visual analytics · 19%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition › robust object recognition
degraded image recognition
0.512021
Bridging the Gap Between Computational Photography and Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual recognition
0.512021
Bridging the Gap Between Computational Photography and Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Image and video processing
image restoration and enhancement
0.512021
Bridging the Gap Between Computational Photography and Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
0.112021
Bridging the Gap Between Computational Photography and Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics
0.112021
Bridging the Gap Between Computational Photography and Visual Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

psychophysics-based evaluation · 1.0deep learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Report on UG2+ challenge Track 1: Assessing algorithms to improve video object detection and classification from unconstrained mobility platforms
Sreya Banerjee, Rosaura G. VidalMata, Zhangyang Wang, Walter J. Scheirer
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.1
2021 Bridging the Gap Between Computational Photography and Visual Recognition
abstract
What is the current state-of-the-art for image restoration and enhancement applied to degraded images acquired under less than ideal circumstances? Can the application of such algorithms as a pre-processing step improve image interpretability for manual analysis or automatic visual recognition to classify scene content? While there have been important advances in the area of computational photography to restore or enhance the visual quality of an image, the capabilities of such techniques have not always translated in a useful way to visual recognition tasks. Consequently, there is a pressing need for the development of algorithms that are designed for the joint problem of improving visual appearance and recognition, which will be an enabling factor for the deployment of visual recognition tools in many real-world scenarios. To address this, we introduce the UG$^2$dataset as a large-scale benchmark composed of video imagery captured under challenging conditions, and two enhancement tasks designed to test algorithmic impact on visual quality and automatic object recognition. Furthermore, we propose a set of metrics to evaluate the joint improvement of such tasks as well as individual algorithmic advances, including a novel psychophysics-based evaluation regime for human assessment and a realistic set of quantitative measures for object recognition performance. We introduce six new algorithms for image restoration or enhancement, which were created as part of the IARPA sponsored UG$^2$Challenge workshop held at CVPR 2018. Under the proposed evaluation regime, we present an in-depth analysis of these algorithms and a host of deep learning-based and classic baseline approaches. From the observed results, it is evident that we are in the early days of building a bridge between computational photography and visual recognition, leaving many opportunities for innovation in this area.
Rosaura G. VidalMata, Sreya Banerjee, Brandon RichardWebster, Michael Albright, Pedro Davalos, Scott McCloskey, Ben Miller, Asong Tambo, Sushobhan Ghosh, Sudarshan Nagesh, Ye Yuan 0012, Yueyu Hu, Wenhan Yang, Xiaoshuai Zhang, Jiaying Liu 0001, Zhangyang Wang, Hwann-Tzong Chen, Tzu-Wei Huang, Wen-Chi Chin, Yi-Chun Li, Mahmoud Lababidi, Charles Otto, Walter J. Scheirer
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2018 UG^2: A Video Benchmark for Assessing the Impact of Image Restoration and Enhancement on Automatic Visual Recognition
abstract
Advances in image restoration and enhancement techniques have led to discussion about how such algorithms can be applied as a pre-processing step to improve automatic visual recognition. In principle, techniques like deblurring and super-resolution should yield improvements by de-emphasizing noise and increasing signal in an input image. But the historically divergent goals of computational photography and visual recognition communities have created a significant need for more work in this direction. To facilitate new research, we introduce a new benchmark dataset called UG2, which contains three difficult real-world scenarios: uncontrolled videos taken by UAVs and manned gliders, as well as controlled videos taken on the ground. Over 150,000 annotated frames for hundreds of ImageNet classes are available, which are used for baseline experiments that assess the impact of known and unknown image artifacts and other conditions on common deep learning-based object classification approaches. Further, current image restoration and enhancement techniques are evaluated by determining whether or not they improve baseline classification performance. Results show that there is plenty of room for algorithmic innovation, making this dataset a useful tool going forward.
Rosaura G. VidalMata, Sreya Banerjee, Klemen Grm, Vitomir Struc, Walter J. Scheirer
WACV2
2017 Neuron Segmentation Using Deep Complete Bipartite Networks
Jianxu Chen 0001, Sreya Banerjee, Abhinav Grama, Walter J. Scheirer, Danny Ziyi Chen
MICCAI (2)2