Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elad Romanov
dblp:200/8809
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
7as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3520-3054ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
5 papers |
Information theory · 31% Mathematical optimization · 31% Algorithms and data structures · 26% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 28 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Newton Meets Marchenko-Pastur: Massively Parallel Second-Order Optimization with Hessian Sketching and Debiasing · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
distributed newton method |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Newton Meets Marchenko-Pastur: Massively Parallel Second-Order Optimization with Hessian Sketching and Debiasing · ICLR 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVD · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Computational complexity
phase transition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVD · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization › singular value decomposition
randomized SVD |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVD · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization
second-order methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Newton Meets Marchenko-Pastur: Massively Parallel Second-Order Optimization with Hessian Sketching and Debiasing · ICLR 2025 |
Information theory › hypothesis testing
signal detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVD · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization
singular value decomposition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVD · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Information theory › probability theory › random matrix theory
spiked random matrix models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVD · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis |
0.8 | 2 | 2025 | Optimal Spectral Shrinkage and PCA With Heteroscedastic Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVD · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
gaussian mixture model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On the Role of Channel Capacity in Learning Gaussian Mixture Models · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On the Role of Channel Capacity in Learning Gaussian Mixture Models · COLT 2022 |
Information theory
channel capacity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On the Role of Channel Capacity in Learning Gaussian Mixture Models · COLT 2022 |
Information theory › channel capacity
gaussian channel |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On the Role of Channel Capacity in Learning Gaussian Mixture Models · COLT 2022 |
Physical-layer communications › digital signal processing
analog-to-digital conversion |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Blind Unwrapping of Modulo Reduced Gaussian Vectors: Recovering MSBs From LSBs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Coding theory › source coding
quantization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Blind Unwrapping of Modulo Reduced Gaussian Vectors: Recovering MSBs From LSBs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Information theory › signal processing
signal recovery |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Blind Unwrapping of Modulo Reduced Gaussian Vectors: Recovering MSBs From LSBs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › high-dimensional statistics
spiked covariance model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimal Spectral Shrinkage and PCA With Heteroscedastic Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Information theory › signal processing
statistical signal processing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimal Spectral Shrinkage and PCA With Heteroscedastic Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
covariance estimation |
0.3 | 2 | 2021 | Blind Unwrapping of Modulo Reduced Gaussian Vectors: Recovering MSBs From LSBs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 Optimal Spectral Shrinkage and PCA With Heteroscedastic Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › serverless computing
function-as-a-service |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Newton Meets Marchenko-Pastur: Massively Parallel Second-Order Optimization with Hessian Sketching and Debiasing · ICLR 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
serverless computing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Newton Meets Marchenko-Pastur: Massively Parallel Second-Order Optimization with Hessian Sketching and Debiasing · ICLR 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVD · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › arithmetic codes
AN codes |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | On the Role of Channel Capacity in Learning Gaussian Mixture Models · COLT 2022 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › error probability analysis
decoding error probability |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | On the Role of Channel Capacity in Learning Gaussian Mixture Models · COLT 2022 |
Information theory
estimation theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Optimal Spectral Shrinkage and PCA With Heteroscedastic Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Information theory › signal processing › signal prediction
linear prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Optimal Spectral Shrinkage and PCA With Heteroscedastic Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Information theory › channel capacity › gaussian channel
vector gaussian |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Blind Unwrapping of Modulo Reduced Gaussian Vectors: Recovering MSBs From LSBs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random matrix theory · 3.1sketching · 2.6newton method · 1.7marchenko-pastur law · 1.7large system limit · 1.1bayesian formulation · 1.1iterative decoding · 1.0asymptotic analysis · 0.9spectral shrinkage · 0.5noise whitening · 0.5maximum likelihood estimation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Newton Meets Marchenko-Pastur: Massively Parallel Second-Order Optimization with Hessian Sketching and DebiasingabstractMotivated by recent advances in serverless cloud computing, in particular the ``function as a service'' (FaaS) model,
we consider the problem of minimizing a convex function in a massively parallel fashion, where communication between workers is limited.
Focusing on the case of a twice-differentiable objective subject to an L2 penalty, we propose a scheme where the central node (server) effectively runs a Newton method,
offloading its high per-iteration cost---stemming from the need to invert the Hessian---to the workers.
In our solution, workers produce independently coarse but low-bias estimates of the inverse Hessian, using an adaptive sketching scheme. The server then averages the descent directions produced by the workers, yielding a good approximation for the exact Newton step. The main component of our adaptive sketching scheme is a low-complexity procedure for selecting the sketching dimension, an issue that was left largely unaddressed in the existing literature on Hessian sketching for distributed optimization. Our solution is based on ideas from asymptotic random matrix theory, specifically the Marchenko-Pastur law. For Gaussian sketching matrices, we derive non asymptotic guarantees for our algorithm which do not depend on the condition number of the Hessian nor a priori require the sketching dimension to be proportional to the dimension, as is often the case in asymptotic random matrix theory. Lastly, when the objective is self-concordant, we provide convergence guarantees for the approximate Newton's method with noisy Hessians, which may be of independent interest beyond the setting considered in this paper. Elad Romanov, Fangzhao Zhang, Mert Pilanci |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | On the Noise Sensitivity of the Randomized SVDabstractThe randomized singular value decomposition (R-SVD) is a popular sketching-based algorithm for efficiently computing the partial SVD of a large matrix. When the matrix is low-rank, the R-SVD produces its partial SVD exactly; but when the rank is large, it only yields an approximation. Motivated by applications in data science and principal component analysis (PCA), we analyze the R-SVD under a low-rank signal plus noise measurement model; specifically, when its input is a spiked random matrix. The singular values produced by the R-SVD are shown to exhibit a BBP-like phase transition: when the SNR exceeds a certain detectability threshold, that depends on the dimension reduction factor, the largest singular value is an outlier; below the threshold, no outlier emerges from the bulk of singular values. We further compute asymptotic formulas for the overlap between the ground truth signal singular vectors and the approximations produced by the R-SVD. Dimensionality reduction has the adverse affect of amplifying the noise in a highly nonlinear manner. Our results demonstrate the statistical advantage of the R-SVD—in both signal detection and estimation—over more naive sketched PCA variants; the advantage is especially dramatic when the sketching dimension is small. Our analysis is asymptotically exact, and substantially more fine-grained than existing operator-norm error bounds for the R-SVD, which largely fail to give meaningful error estimates in the moderate SNR regime. It applies for a broad family of sketching matrices previously considered in the literature, including Gaussian i.i.d. sketches, random projections, and the sub-sampled Hadamard transform, among others. Lastly, we derive optimal singular value shrinkers for singular values and vectors obtained through the R-SVD, designed optimally for both matrix denoising and covariance estimation. For the second task, the performance gains offered by the new shrinker may be particularly significant, especially so when the sketching dimension is small. Elad Romanov |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2022 | Spiked Covariance Estimation from Modulo-Reduced MeasurementsabstractConsider the rank-1 spiked model: $\bf{X}=\sqrt{\nu}\xi \bf{u}+ \bf{Z}$, where $\nu$ is the spike intensity, $\bf{u}\in\mathbb{S}^{k-1}$ is an unknown direction and $\xi\sim \mathcal{N}(0,1),\bf{Z}\sim \mathcal{N}(\bf{0},\bf{I})$. Motivated by recent advances in analog-to-digital conversion, we study the problem of recovering $\bf{u}\in \mathbb{S}^{k-1}$ from $n$ i.i.d. modulo-reduced measurements $\bf{Y}=[\bf{X}]\mod \Delta$, focusing on the high-dimensional regime ($k\gg 1$). We develop and analyze an algorithm that, for most directions $\bf{u}$ and $\nu=\mathrm{poly}(k)$, estimates $\bf{u}$ to high accuracy using $n=\mathrm{poly}(k)$ measurements, provided that $\Delta\gtrsim \sqrt{\log k}$. Up to constants, our algorithm accurately estimates $\bf{u}$ at the smallest possible $\Delta$ that allows (in an information-theoretic sense) to recover $\bf{X}$ from $\bf{Y}$. A key step in our analysis involves estimating the probability that a line segment of length $\approx\sqrt{\nu}$ in a random direction $\bf{u}$ passes near a point in the lattice $\Delta \mathbb{Z}^k$. Numerical experiments show that the developed algorithm performs well even in a non-asymptotic setting. Elad Romanov, Or Ordentlich |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2022 | On the Role of Channel Capacity in Learning Gaussian Mixture ModelsabstractThis paper studies the sample complexity of learning the $k$ unknown centers of a balanced Gaussian mixture model (GMM) in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with spherical covariance matrix $\sigma^2\bm{I}$. In particular, we are interested in the following question: what is the maximal noise level $\sigma^2$, for which the sample complexity is essentially the same as when estimating the centers from labeled measurements? To that end, we restrict attention to a Bayesian formulation of the problem, where the centers are uniformly distributed on the sphere $\sqrt{d}\mathcal{S}^{d-1}$. Our main results characterize the \emph{exact noise threshold} $\sigma^2$ below which the GMM learning problem, in the large system limit $d,k\to\infty$, is as easy as learning from labeled observations, and above which it is substantially harder. The threshold occurs at $\frac{\log k}{d} = \frac12\log\left( 1+\frac{1}{\sigma^2} \right)$, which is the capacity of the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. Thinking of the set of $k$ centers as a code, this noise threshold can be interpreted as the largest noise level for which the error probability of the code over the AWGN channel is small. Previous works on the GMM learning problem have identified the \emph{minimum distance} between the centers as a key parameter in determining the statistical difficulty of learning the corresponding GMM. While our results are only proved for GMMs whose centers are uniformly distributed over the sphere, they hint that perhaps it is the decoding error probability associated with the center constellation as a channel code that determines the statistical difficulty of learning the corresponding GMM, rather than just the minimum distance. Elad Romanov, Tamir Bendory, Or Ordentlich |
COLT | 1 |
| 2021 | Optimal Spectral Shrinkage and PCA With Heteroscedastic NoiseabstractThis paper studies the related problems of prediction, covariance estimation, and principal component analysis for the spiked covariance model with heteroscedastic noise. We consider an estimator of the principal components based on whitening the noise, and we derive optimal singular value and eigenvalue shrinkers for use with these estimated principal components. Underlying these methods are new asymptotic results for the high-dimensional spiked model with heteroscedastic noise, and consistent estimators for the relevant population parameters. We extend previous analysis on out-of-sample prediction to the setting of predictors with whitening. We demonstrate certain advantages of noise whitening. Specifically, we show that in a certain asymptotic regime, optimal singular value shrinkage with whitening converges to the best linear predictor, whereas without whitening it converges to a suboptimal linear predictor. We prove that for generic signals, whitening improves estimation of the principal components, and increases a natural signal-to-noise ratio of the observations. We also show that for rank one signals, our estimated principal components achieve the asymptotic minimax rate. William E. Leeb, Elad Romanov |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2021 | Blind Unwrapping of Modulo Reduced Gaussian Vectors: Recovering MSBs From LSBsabstractWe consider the problem of recovering n i.i.d. samples from a zero mean multivariate Gaussian distribution with an unknown covariance matrix, from their modulo wrapped measurements, i.e., measurements where each coordinate is reduced modulo Δ, for some Δ > 0. For this setup, which is motivated by quantization and analog-to-digital conversion, we develop a low-complexity iterative decoding algorithm. We show that if a benchmark informed decoder that knows the covariance matrix can recover each sample with small error probability, and n is large enough, the performance of the proposed blind recovery algorithm closely follows that of the informed one. We complement the analysis with numerical results that show that the algorithm performs well even in non-asymptotic conditions. Elad Romanov, Or Ordentlich |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2019 | Blind Unwrapping of Modulo Reduced Gaussian Vectors: Recovering MSBs from LSBsabstractWe consider the problem of recovering n i.i.d samples from a zero mean multivariate Gaussian distribution with an unknown covariance matrix, from their modulo wrapped measurements, i.e., measurement where each coordinate is reduced modulo Δ, for some Δ > 0. For this setup, which is motivated by quantization and analog-to-digital conversion, we develop a low-complexity iterative decoding algorithm. We show that if an informed decoder that knows the covariance matrix can recover each sample with small error probability, and n is large enough, the performance of the proposed blind recovery algorithm closely follows that of the informed one. We complement the analysis with numeric results that show that the algorithm performs well even in non-asymptotic conditions. Elad Romanov, Or Ordentlich |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2019 | Above the Nyquist Rate, Modulo Folding Does Not HurtabstractWe consider the problem of recovering a continuoustime bandlimited signal from the discrete-time signal, obtained from sampling it every Tsseconds and reducing the result modulo Δ, for some Δ > 0. For Δ = ∞, the celebrated Shannon-Nyquist sampling theorem guarantees that perfect recovery is possible, provided that the sampling rate 1/Tsexceeds the so-called Nyquist rate. Recent work by Bhandari et al. has shown that for any Δ > 0 perfect reconstruction is still possible, if the sampling rate exceeds the Nyquist rate by a factor of ire. In this letter, we improve upon this result and show that for finite energy signals, perfect recovery is possible for any Δ > 0 and any sampling rate above the Nyquist rate. Thus, modulo folding does not degrade the signal, provided that the sampling rate exceeds the Nyquist rate. This claim is proved by establishing a connection between the recovery problem of a discrete-time signal from its modulo reduced version and the problem of predicting the next sample of a discrete-time signal from its past, and leveraging the fact that for a bandlimited signal the prediction error can be made arbitrarily small. Elad Romanov, Or Ordentlich |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 1 |