Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Thulke

dblp:201/3206 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9808-7073ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 70% Machine translation · 26% Speech recognition and synthesis · 4%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue generation
dialogue response generation
0.812024
Task-Oriented Document-Grounded Dialog Systems by HLTPR@RWTH for DSTC9 and DSTC10 · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge-grounded dialogue
document-grounded dialogue
0.812024
Task-Oriented Document-Grounded Dialog Systems by HLTPR@RWTH for DSTC9 and DSTC10 · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue generation › dialogue response generation
knowledge-grounded response generation
0.812024
Task-Oriented Document-Grounded Dialog Systems by HLTPR@RWTH for DSTC9 and DSTC10 · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.812024
Task-Oriented Document-Grounded Dialog Systems by HLTPR@RWTH for DSTC9 and DSTC10 · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › speech translation
cascaded speech translation
0.612022
Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
speech translation
0.612022
Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022
Information retrieval
search engines
0.212024
Task-Oriented Document-Grounded Dialog Systems by HLTPR@RWTH for DSTC9 and DSTC10 · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
0.212022
Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

noisy channel model · 1.5hierarchical selection · 1.5data augmentation · 1.5marginalizing transcription posteriors · 0.6joint training · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Task-Oriented Document-Grounded Dialog Systems by HLTPR@RWTH for DSTC9 and DSTC10
abstract
This paper summarizes our contributions to the document-grounded dialog tasks at the 9th and 10th Dialog System Technology Challenges (DSTC9 and DSTC10). In both iterations the task consists of three subtasks: first detect whether the current turn is knowledge seeking, second select a relevant knowledge document, and third generate a response grounded on the selected document. For DSTC9 we proposed different approaches to make the selection task more efficient. The best method, Hierarchical Selection, actually improves the results compared to the original baseline and gives a speedup of 24x. In the DSTC10 iteration of the task, the challenge was to adapt systems trained on written dialogs to perform well on noisy automatic speech recognition transcripts. Therefore, we proposed data augmentation techniques to increase the robustness of the models as well as methods to adapt the style of generated responses to fit well into the proceeding dialog. Additionally, we proposed a noisy channel model that allows for increasing the factuality of the generated responses. In addition to summarizing our previous contributions, in this work, we also report on a few small improvements and reconsider the automatic evaluation metrics for the generation task which have shown a low correlation to human judgments.
David Thulke, Nico Daheim, Christian Dugast, Hermann Ney
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.1
2022 Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation?
abstract
Currently, in speech translation, the straightforward approach -cascading a recognition system with a translation system -delivers state-of-theart results.However, fundamental challenges such as error propagation from the automatic speech recognition system still remain.To mitigate these problems, recently, people turn their attention to direct data and propose various joint training methods.In this work, we seek to answer the question of whether joint training really helps cascaded speech translation.We review recent papers on the topic and also investigate a joint training criterion by marginalizing the transcription posterior probabilities.Our findings show that a strong cascaded baseline can diminish any improvements obtained using joint training, and we suggest alternatives to joint training.We hope this work can serve as a refresher of the current speech translation landscape, and motivate research in finding more efficient and creative ways to utilize the direct data for speech translation.
Viet Anh Khoa Tran, David Thulke, Yingbo Gao, Christian Herold, Hermann Ney
EMNLP2
2021 On Sampling-Based Training Criteria for Neural Language Modeling
abstract
As the vocabulary size of modern word-based language models becomes ever larger, many sampling-based training criteria are proposed and investigated.The essence of these sampling methods is that the softmax-related traversal over the entire vocabulary can be simplified, giving speedups compared to the baseline.A problem we notice about the current landscape of such sampling methods is the lack of a systematic comparison and some myths about preferring one over another.In this work, we consider Monte Carlo sampling, importance sampling, a novel method we call compensated partial summation, and noise contrastive estimation.Linking back to the three traditional criteria, namely mean squared error, binary cross-entropy, and crossentropy, we derive the theoretical solutions to the training problems.Contrary to some common belief, we show that all these sampling methods can perform equally well, as long as we correct for the intended class posterior probabilities.Experimental results in language modeling and automatic speech recognition on Switchboard and LibriSpeech support our claim, with all sampling-based methods showing similar perplexities and word error rates while giving the expected speedups.
Yingbo Gao, David Thulke, Alexander Gerstenberger, Khoa Viet Tran, Ralf Schlüter, Hermann Ney
Interspeech2
2021 Towards a Natural Language Dialog System for Mobility Service Platforms
abstract
706
David Thulke, Felix Schwinger, Karl-Heinz Krempels
VEHITS1
2017 Integration of Private and Carsharing Vehicles into Intermodal Travel Information Systems
abstract
In the last years, intermodal mobility platforms offering combinations of various modal types, like trains, buses, carsharing and ride sharing, have emerged. These platforms often also offer a smartphone-based door-to-door navigation and a sophisticated travel assistance. Unfortunately, these smartphone-based services cannot be used by the travelers as soon as they are driving a car themselves, e.g., a carsharing vehicle or their private car, due to road safety regulations. The driver is essentially disconnected from the service. In addition, modern cars have a lot of configuration options a driver might want to set up. This discourages using shared vehicles in an intermodal itinerary. In this work we identify use cases of how an integration of carsharing vehicles into intermodal travel information systems can enhance travel experience, introduce a system architecture to allow the necessary information exchange and present a preliminary prototype to demonstrate its technical feasibility.
Christian Samsel, Markus C. Beutel, David Thulke, Detlef Kuck, Karl-Heinz Krempels
VEHITS3