Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Judson Wilson

dblp:201/5376 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 46% Video understanding and tracking · 46% Robot navigation and mapping · 7%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 53% Network security · 32% Privacy and data protection · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › visual localization
multi-camera localization
0.312017
Unsupervised camera localization in crowded spaces · ICRA 2017
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-camera tracking
0.312017
Unsupervised camera localization in crowded spaces · ICRA 2017
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
person tracking
0.312017
Unsupervised camera localization in crowded spaces · ICRA 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision
visual localization
0.312017
Unsupervised camera localization in crowded spaces · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.112017
Unsupervised camera localization in crowded spaces · ICRA 2017
Network security › traffic analysis
encrypted traffic analysis
0.112017
Trust but Verify: Auditing the Secure Internet of Things · MobiSys 2017
Network security
traffic analysis
0.112017
Trust but Verify: Auditing the Secure Internet of Things · MobiSys 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised learning · 0.3social awareness · 0.3nonlinear least-squares optimization · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Unsupervised camera localization in crowded spaces
abstract
Existing camera networks in public spaces such as train terminals or malls can help social robots to navigate crowded scenes. However, the localization of the cameras is required, i.e., the positions and poses of all cameras in a unique reference. In this work, we estimate the relative location of any pair of cameras by solely using noisy trajectories observed from each camera. We propose a fully unsupervised learning technique using unlabelled pedestrians motion patterns captured in crowded scenes. We first estimate the pairwise camera parameters by optimally matching single-view pedestrian tracks using social awareness. Then, we show the impact of jointly estimating the network parameters. This is done by formulating a nonlinear least square optimization problem, leveraging a continuous approximation of the matching function. We evaluate our approach in real-world environments such as train terminals, where several hundreds of individuals need to be tracked across dozens of cameras every second.
Alexandre Alahi, Judson Wilson, Li Fei-Fei 0001, Silvio Savarese
ICRA2
2017 Trust but Verify: Auditing the Secure Internet of Things
abstract
Internet-of-Things devices often collect and transmit sensitive information like camera footage, health monitoring data, or whether someone is home. These devices protect data in transit with end-to-end encryption, typically using TLS connections between devices and associated cloud services. But these TLS connections also prevent device owners from observing what their own devices are saying about them. Unlike in traditional Internet applications, where the end user controls one end of a connection (e.g., their web browser) and can observe its communication, Internet-of-Things vendors typically control the software in both the device and the cloud. As a result, owners have no way to audit the behavior of their own devices, leaving them little choice but to hope that these devices are transmitting only what they should.
Judson Wilson, Riad S. Wahby, Henry Corrigan-Gibbs, Dan Boneh, Philip Alexander Levis, Keith Winstein
MobiSys1