Predictive coding, currently a highly influential theory in neuroscience, has not been widely adopted in machine learning yet. In this work, we transform the seminal model of Rao and Ballard (1999) into a modern deep learning framework while remaining maximally faithful to the original schema. The resulting network we propose (PreCNet) is tested on a widely used next-frame video prediction benchmark, which consists of images from an urban environment recorded from a car-mounted camera, and achieves state-of-the-art performance. Performance on all measures (MSE, PSNR, and SSIM) was further improved when a larger training set (2M images from BDD100k) pointed to the limitations of the KITTI training set. This work demonstrates that an architecture carefully based on a neuroscience model, without being explicitly tailored to the task at hand, can exhibit exceptional performance.

In haptic object discrimination, the effect of gripper embodiment, action parameters, and sensory channels has not been systematically studied. We used two anthropomorphic hands and two two-finger grippers to grasp two sets of deformable objects. On the object classification task, we found: 1) among classifiers, SVM on sensory features and LSTM on raw time series performed best across all grippers; 2) faster compression speeds degraded performance; 3) generalization to different grasping configurations was limited; transfer to different compression speeds worked well for the Barrett Hand only. Visualization of the feature spaces using PCA showed that gripper morphology and action parameters were the main source of variance, making generalization across embodiment or grip configurations very difficult. On the highly challenging dataset consisting of polyurethane foams alone, only the Barrett Hand achieved excellent performance. Tactile sensors can thus provide a key advantage even if recognition is based on stiffness rather than shape. The dataset with 24 000 measurements is publicly available.

Accurately predicting contact between our bodies and environmental objects is paramount to our evolutionary survival. It has been hypothesized that multisensory neurons responding both to touch on the body, and to auditory or visual stimuli occurring near them-thus delineating our peripersonal space (PPS)-may be a critical player in this computation. However, we lack a normative account (i.e., a model specifying how we ought to compute) linking impact prediction and PPS encoding. Here, we leverage Bayesian Decision Theory to develop such a model and show that it recapitulates many of the characteristics of PPS. Namely, a normative model of impact prediction (i) delineates a graded boundary between near and far space, (ii) demonstrates an enlargement of PPS as the speed of incoming stimuli increases, (iii) shows stronger contact prediction for looming than receding stimuli-but critically is still present for receding stimuli when observation uncertainty is non-zero-, (iv) scales with the value we attribute to environmental objects, and finally (v) can account for the differing sizes of PPS for different body parts. Together, these modeling results support the conjecture that PPS reflects the computation of impact prediction, and make a number of testable predictions for future empirical studies.