Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eysa Lee
dblp:202/3137
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-2860-2417ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 10 · 5 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
8 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 45% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 42% Authentication and access control · 9% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
3.2 | 6 | 2024 | Threshold ECDSA in Three Rounds · SP 2024 Threshold BBS+ Signatures for Distributed Anonymous Credential Issuance · SP 2023 Multiparty Generation of an RSA Modulus · J. Cryptol. 2022 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
threshold cryptography |
2.7 | 5 | 2024 | Threshold ECDSA in Three Rounds · SP 2024 Threshold BBS+ Signatures for Distributed Anonymous Credential Issuance · SP 2023 Multiparty Generation of an RSA Modulus · J. Cryptol. 2022 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
threshold signature |
2.1 | 4 | 2024 | Threshold ECDSA in Three Rounds · SP 2024 Threshold BBS+ Signatures for Distributed Anonymous Credential Issuance · SP 2023 Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions: The Multiparty Case · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019 |
Authentication and access control
anonymous credentials |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Multi-Holder Anonymous Credentials from BBS Signatures · CRYPTO (6) 2025 Threshold BBS+ Signatures for Distributed Anonymous Credential Issuance · SP 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › threshold signature
threshold ECDSA |
1.5 | 3 | 2024 | Threshold ECDSA in Three Rounds · SP 2024 Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions: The Multiparty Case · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019 Secure Two-party Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
1.2 | 2 | 2025 | Multi-Holder Anonymous Credentials from BBS Signatures · CRYPTO (6) 2025 Secure Two-party Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management › distributed key generation
distributed RSA key generation |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Multiparty Generation of an RSA Modulus · J. Cryptol. 2022 Multiparty Generation of an RSA Modulus · CRYPTO (3) 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
oblivious transfer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Threshold ECDSA in Three Rounds · SP 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › pairing-based signatures
BBS+ signature |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Threshold BBS+ Signatures for Distributed Anonymous Credential Issuance · SP 2023 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › blockchain cryptography
cryptocurrency signing |
0.4 | 3 | 2024 | Threshold ECDSA in Three Rounds · SP 2024 Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions: The Multiparty Case · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019 Secure Two-party Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
public-key cryptography |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multiparty Generation of an RSA Modulus · CRYPTO (3) 2020 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
RSA |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multiparty Generation of an RSA Modulus · CRYPTO (3) 2020 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
distributed signatures |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions: The Multiparty Case · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › discrete logarithm signature
ECDSA |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Secure Two-party Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Privacy and data protection
anonymization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Holder Anonymous Credentials from BBS Signatures · CRYPTO (6) 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › pseudorandom functions
verifiable random functions |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Threshold BBS+ Signatures for Distributed Anonymous Credential Issuance · SP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
universal composability · 0.8two-party multiplication · 0.8commitment scheme · 0.8random oracle model · 0.7computational diffie-hellman assumption · 0.7composable security proof · 0.7distributed primality testing · 0.6multi-party computation · 0.4two-party multiplication protocol · 0.4malicious adversary security proof · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-Holder Anonymous Credentials from BBS Signatures
Andrea Flamini, Eysa Lee, Anna Lysyanskaya |
CRYPTO (6) | 2 |
| 2025 | An Unstoppable Ideal Functionality for Signatures and a Modular Analysis of the Dolev-Strong Broadcast
Ran Cohen, Jack Doerner, Eysa Lee, Anna Lysyanskaya, Lawrence Roy |
TCC (4) | 3 |
| 2024 | Threshold ECDSA in Three RoundsabstractWe present a three-round protocol for threshold ECDSA signing with malicious security against a dishonest majority, which information-theoretically UC-realizes a standard threshold signing functionality, assuming only ideal commitment and two-party multiplication primitives. Our protocol combines an intermediate representation of ECDSA signatures that was recently introduced by Abram et al. [2] with an efficient statistical consistency check reminiscent of the ones used by the protocols of Doerner et al. [3], [4]. We show that shared keys for our signing protocol can be generated using a simple commit-release-and-complain procedure, without any proofs of knowledge, and to compute the intermediate representation of each signature, we propose a two-round vectorized multiplication protocol based on oblivious transfer that outperforms all similar constructions. We demonstrate empirically that our protocol outperforms those of Doerner et al. by factors of as much as six in high-latency environments, and that it is multiple orders of magnitude faster than Paillier-based approaches. Jack Doerner, Yashvanth Kondi, Eysa Lee, Abhi Shelat |
SP | 3 |
| 2023 | Threshold BBS+ Signatures for Distributed Anonymous Credential IssuanceabstractWe propose a secure multiparty signing protocol for the BBS+ signature scheme; in other words, an anonymous credential scheme with threshold issuance. We prove that due to the structure of the BBS+ signature, simply verifying the signature produced by an otherwise semi-honest protocol is sufficient to achieve composable security against a malicious adversary. Consequently, our protocol is extremely simple and efficient: it involves a single request from the client (who requires a signature) to the signing parties, two exchanges of messages among the signing parties, and finally a response to the client; in some deployment scenarios the concrete cost bottleneck may be the client’s local verification of the signature that it receives. Furthermore, our protocol can be extended to support the strongest form of blind signing and to serve as a distributed evaluation protocol for the Dodis-Yampolskiy Oblivious VRF. We validate our efficiency claims by implementing and benchmarking our protocol. Jack Doerner, Yashvanth Kondi, Eysa Lee, Abhi Shelat, LaKyah Tyner |
SP | 3 |
| 2022 | Multiparty Generation of an RSA Modulus
Megan Chen, Jack Doerner, Yashvanth Kondi, Eysa Lee, Schuyler Rosefield, Abhi Shelat, Ran Cohen |
J. Cryptol. | 4 |
| 2020 | Circuit Amortization Friendly Encodingsand Their Application to Statistically Secure Multiparty Computation
Anders P. K. Dalskov, Eysa Lee, Eduardo Soria-Vazquez |
ASIACRYPT (3) | 2 |
| 2020 | Multiparty Generation of an RSA Modulus
Megan Chen, Ran Cohen, Jack Doerner, Yashvanth Kondi, Eysa Lee, Schuyler Rosefield, Abhi Shelat |
CRYPTO (3) | 5 |
| 2019 | Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions: The Multiparty CaseabstractCryptocurrency applications have spurred a resurgence of interest in the computation of ECDSA signatures using threshold protocols---that is, protocols in which the signing key is secret-shared among n parties, of which any subset of size t must interact in order to compute a signature. Among the resulting works to date, that of Doerner et al. requires the most natural assumptions while also achieving the best practical signing speed. It is, however, limited to the setting in which the threshold is two. We propose an extension of their scheme to arbitrary thresholds, and prove it secure against a malicious adversary corrupting up to one party less than the threshold under only the Computational Diffie-Hellman assumption in the Random Oracle model, an assumption strictly weaker than those under which ECDSA is proven. Whereas the best current schemes for threshold-two ECDSA signing use a Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange to calculate each signature's nonce, a direct adaptation of this technique to a larger threshold t would incur a round count linear in t; thus we abandon it in favor of a new mechanism that yields a protocol requiring log(t)+6 rounds in total. We design a new consistency check, similar in spirit to that of Doerner et al., but suitable for an arbitrary number of participants, and we optimize the underlying two-party multiplication protocol on which our scheme is based, reducing its concrete communication and computation costs. We implement our scheme and evaluate it among groups of up to 256 of co-located and 128 geographically-distributed parties, and among small groups of embedded devices. We find that in the LAN setting, our scheme outperforms all prior works by orders of magnitude, and that it is efficient enough for use even on smartphones or hardware tokens. In the WAN setting we find that, despite its logarithmic round count, our protocol outperforms the best constant-round protocols in realistic scenarios. Jack Doerner, Yashvanth Kondi, Eysa Lee, Abhi Shelat |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 3 |
| 2018 | Secure Two-party Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA AssumptionsabstractThe Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) is one of the most widely used schemes in deployed cryptography. Through its applications in code and binary authentication, web security, and cryptocurrency, it is likely one of the few cryptographic algorithms encountered on a daily basis by the average person. However, its design is such that executing multi-party or threshold signatures in a secure manner is challenging: unlike other, less widespread signature schemes, secure multi-party ECDSA requires custom protocols, which has heretofore implied reliance upon additional cryptographic assumptions such as the Paillier encryption scheme. We propose new protocols for multi-party ECDSA key-generation and signing with a threshold of two, which we prove secure against malicious adversaries in the random oracle model using only the Computational Diffie-Hellman Assumption and the assumptions already implied by ECDSA itself. Our scheme requires only two messages, and via implementation we find that it outperforms the best prior results in practice by a factor of 55 for key generation and 16 for signing, coming to within a factor of 12 of local signatures. Concretely, two parties can jointly sign a message in just over two milliseconds. Jack Doerner, Yashvanth Kondi, Eysa Lee, Abhi Shelat |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 3 |
| 2017 | Signature Schemes with Randomized Verification
Cody Freitag, Rishab Goyal, Susan Hohenberger, Venkata Koppula, Eysa Lee, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Jordan Tran, Brent Waters |
ACNS | 5 |