Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard B. North

dblp:202/4222 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
neurostimulation
0.112008
Neural Interface Devices: Spinal Cord Stimulation Technology · Proc. IEEE 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.1computer modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Neural Interface Devices: Spinal Cord Stimulation Technology
abstract
This review of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and its technology begins with an overview of the history and background of electroanalgesia, from the use of electric fish in ancient times through the development of the first SCS devices. Discussion of the clinical goals of SCS as a treatment for neuropathic and ischemic pain includes accepted and emerging indications and focuses on various aspects of the technical goal of appropriate paresthesia coverage. While acknowledging that much remains to be discovered about the mechanisms of action of SCS, the review describes what is known about its neurochemical effects and summarizes the results of experimental and clinical studies that seek to illuminate why SCS is effective. After noting the importance and development of computer modeling studies that indicate ways to improve delivery of the electrical pulses, the review covers the advantages of various types of SCS electrodes and power generators and the use of computerized methods to optimize SCS therapy in individual patients and to provide information about the clinical performance of various types of equipment. Finally, this paper identifies important design issues and options as well as the challenges posed by various failure modes, by environmental and medical precautions, and by cost effectiveness and patient access issues.
Richard B. North
Proc. IEEE1