Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ting-Yu Shen

dblp:202/9578 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 89% Integrated circuit design · 11%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.722019
DR-Scan: Dual-Rail Asynchronous Scan DfT and ATPG · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2019
Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
asynchronous circuit testing
0.412019
DR-Scan: Dual-Rail Asynchronous Scan DfT and ATPG · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2019
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
design for testability
0.312017
Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.312017
Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits · DAC 2017
Integrated circuit design
asynchronous circuit design
0.222019
DR-Scan: Dual-Rail Asynchronous Scan DfT and ATPG · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2019
Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits · DAC 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vertex coloring · 0.4full-scan dft · 0.4ATPG · 0.4stuck-at test · 0.3scan design · 0.3delay test · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 DR-Scan: Dual-Rail Asynchronous Scan DfT and ATPG
abstract
Due to many state-holding elements in asynchronous circuits, many faults need two-pattern tests. This paper presents a test methodology (DR-scan) for dual-rail asynchronous circuits. Our design for testability is a full-scan, clock-less technique that supports both one-pattern and two-pattern tests for single stuck-at faults. DR-scan is able to test memory elements in dual-rail logic without breaking local feedback loops. To reduce test time, we choose a minimum set of selected test configurations (TCs). If there are more than one selected TCs, we need to split scan latches into multiple scan chains. To apply two-pattern tests, we partition the circuit using vertex coloring. With our test methodology, we can apply traditional full-scan automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) to generate two-pattern tests with high test coverage. Experimental results show our methodology can achieve test coverage up to nearly 94% for various asynchronous circuits.
Shih-An Hsieh, Ying-Hsu Wang, Ting-Yu Shen, Kuan-Yen Huang, Chia-Cheng Pai, Tsai-Chieh Chen, Chien-Mo James Li
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.3
2018 Test methodology for PCHB/PCFB Asynchronous Circuits
abstract
Among many asynchronous design styles, precharge half/full buffers (PCHB/PCFB) are popular due to small area and high performance. This paper proposes new test methodology for PCHB/PCFB asynchronous circuits. Our proposed design for testability (DfT) does not break any internal feedback loop so it is small in area. There are two major theoretical contributions in this paper. First, this paper analyzes the fault effects of transition delay faults, which were not studied in depth by previous research. Second, we also analyze faults on fanout branches that break the isochronic fork assumption. One important conclusion is that these faults can not only degrade the circuit performance but also modify data so they must be tested. We propose three-pattern tests for stuck-at faults and four-pattern tests for transition delay faults. In addition, we propose a new model for ATPG so that existing tools can be used. On the average, our work achieves 93% and 92% stuck-at and transition delay fault coverage, respectively, which is much higher than previous techniques.
Ting-Yu Shen, Chia-Cheng Pai, Tsai-Chieh Chen, Chien-Mo James Li, Samuel Pan
ITC1
2017 Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits
abstract
With low power and variation-tolerant features, asynchronous have been widely used in advanced VLSI designs. Testing asynchronous circuits has become a very important practical issue. This research presents new test methodology, including design for testability (DFT) and automatic test pattern generation (ATPG), for asynchronous dual-rail circuits. The proposed DAC-scan cell is a hazard-free scan design, which can be applied to various implementations of dual-rail asynchronous circuits. Two-pattern stuck-at test and three-pattern delay test techniques are presented to detect local feedback faults in the circuits without inserting extra DFT into feedback loops. With our test methodology, we can use traditional full-scan ATPG to generate high fault coverage test patterns. Moreover, designers can tradeoff between fault coverage and area overhead by using different versions of DAC-scan cells.
Kuan-Yen Huang, Ting-Yu Shen, Chien-Mo James Li
DAC2