Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jon Millican

dblp:203/4404 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key exchange
0.312018
On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security Guarantees · CCS 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure messaging
post-compromise security
0.312018
On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security Guarantees · CCS 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure messaging
secure group messaging
0.312018
On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security Guarantees · CCS 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure messaging
0.312018
On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security Guarantees · CCS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree-based diffie-hellman · 0.3asynchronous ratcheting trees · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security Guarantees
abstract
In the past few years secure messaging has become mainstream, with over a billion active users of end-to-end encryption protocols such as Signal. The Signal Protocol provides a strong property called post-compromise security to its users. However, it turns out that many of its implementations provide, without notification, a weaker property for group messaging: an adversary who compromises a single group member can read and inject messages indefinitely. We show for the first time that post-compromise security can be achieved in realistic, asynchronous group messaging systems. We present a design called Asynchronous Ratcheting Trees (ART), which uses tree-based Diffie-Hellman key exchange to allow a group of users to derive a shared symmetric key even if no two are ever online at the same time. ART scales to groups containing thousands of members, while still providing provable security guarantees. It has seen significant interest from industry, and forms the basis for two draft IETF RFCs and a chartered working group. Our results show that strong security guarantees for group messaging are practically achievable in a modern setting.
Katriel Cohn-Gordon, Cas Cremers, Luke Garratt, Jon Millican, Kevin Milner 0002
CCS4